- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:05 pm to PsychTiger
When you have to read a pre-written response written by a staffer, you’re losing.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:05 pm to TigerProwl24
Haha, its over... That was a left hook that landed and sent them in the ropes
Throw in the damn towel... blah blah blah
Throw in the damn towel... blah blah blah
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:06 pm to redandright
quote:
When you have to read a pre-written response written by a staffer, you’re losing.
And one that doesn't even address the question.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:06 pm to Lsut81
From Murkowski of all people wow
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:06 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
Why didn't the House reissue the subpoenas after authorizing subpoena power on October 31st.
Her argument is they don't need to.
This Dem fricks actually think they have ultimate power over the WH.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:06 pm to Lsut81
She didn't even touch the question
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:06 pm to Lsut81
What does she keep saying president instead of precedent? Idiot.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:06 pm to MFn GIMP
She's not answering the question.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:07 pm to TigerBait1971
The House didn’t try a lawful, bipartisan impeachment because that wouldn’t have worked.
What a joke.
What a joke.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:07 pm to Lsut81
Who would have thought that the waffling Murkowski would land the knockout blow? 
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:07 pm to geauxtigers87
quote:
From Murkowski of all people wow
Ya. That's the shocking part. I would expect something like that from Cruz or Cornyn, but not her.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:07 pm to TigerBait1971
The blatant misinterpretation of house rules is scary.
Yield?
Yield?
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 8:08 pm
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:07 pm to loogaroo
Fat white woman in texas likes brown peen
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:07 pm to TigerBait1971
Holy frick... Shut up you Barney looking bitch
I can read pre-written shite that doens’t answer a question too. But I could at least do it more succinctly than you.
I can read pre-written shite that doens’t answer a question too. But I could at least do it more succinctly than you.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:07 pm to Lsut81
So, the House Managers just got “Murked”.


Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:07 pm to TigerCoon
She may want to go check the quorum clause for what constitutes an "act of congress..." She is lying through her fricking teeth.
If they want C. Justice Roberts to be their side, they may not want to misconstrue jurisprudence like that.
If they want C. Justice Roberts to be their side, they may not want to misconstrue jurisprudence like that.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:08 pm to Centinel
WTH was that a filibuster?
Popular
Back to top


1











