- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/2/25 at 11:42 am to TigerB8
I knew this sounded familiar. Trump filed this awhile ago, correct?
Posted on 4/2/25 at 11:47 am to cajunangelle
quote:
knew this sounded familiar. Trump filed this awhile ago, correct?
Yes, and it didn't go well. Case dismissed by a Clinton-appointed judge...with the ease of judge shopping how did that happen???
SERIOUS financial sanctions imposed by the judge against Trump's attorneys. Trump should have sued them for malpractice for choosing a Clinton judge in a case against Hillary Clinton.
This post was edited on 4/2/25 at 11:53 am
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:29 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
I knew this sounded familiar. Trump filed this awhile ago, correct?
2022
Posted on 4/2/25 at 1:49 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
He uses it as a potential source of personal revenue.
Trump spent millions in legal fees fighting bogus cases. Why shouldn't he be compensated? Do you expect everyone who gets wrongfully sued or charged to just eat the legal cost or only Trump?
Posted on 4/2/25 at 1:58 pm to Clyde Tipton
quote:
I wonder which judge will be assigned the case?
Randomly a democrat
Posted on 4/2/25 at 1:59 pm to IvoryBillMatt
The JUDGE should be cited for even hearing the case.a clear conflict.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:08 pm to TigerB8
quote:
The lawsuit seeks more than $72 million in damages, an amount that is triple the $24 million in legal fees and other damages that Trump allegedly has accrued as a result of the defendants’ purported conduct.
I think DJT has experience in this stuff. When he had the USFL that he won.
1 dollar in damages (trebled was 3 dollars) split evenly between all USFL team owners.
Lather, Rinse, Repeat.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:49 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
What a colossal waste of time. He won, he beat it back and the perps were largely destroyed in terms of credibility. A lawsuit would just be a distraction and a way to make them spend money. In the end it's a loser of a case
People need to know about the corruption of the left
Posted on 4/2/25 at 3:27 pm to TigerB8
Give me some time. I'll get lawsuit and link it
Posted on 4/2/25 at 3:28 pm to ole man
Oh, so Sec. 8 in Batesville, sorry.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 3:39 pm to Flats
Until a conservative leaning judge from the Fifth Circuit issues an injunction that you happen to agree with that negatively effects a Democratic President's policy.....then he/ she is a rock star.
Where am I wrong here
Where am I wrong here
Posted on 4/2/25 at 5:01 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
He incurred that as a former President. Note to Ten Wheels... don't grab women by the pussy in high end department stores and you won't get accused of things like grabbing pussy.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 5:23 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
What a colossal waste of time.
They've wasted 9+ years of everybody's lives making up bullshite to destroy the man.
But let's ignore that fact, according to.... *checks notes*
quote:
KiwiHead
Ok bro
Posted on 4/2/25 at 6:17 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
He incurred that as a former President. Note to Ten Wheels... don't grab women by the pussy in high end department stores and you won't get accused of things like grabbing pussy
Lmao! Seriously? Trump owned the hotel across the street! Why would he frick some random nutty chick in a dressing room? Remember, New York changed their SoL on that particular crime for one year, the same year cat nip crazy bitch filed her lawsuit. It was all set up and planned.
If you cant acknowledge this...... your are grossly dishonest.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:52 am to KiwiHead
quote:
Until a conservative leaning judge from the Fifth Circuit issues an injunction that you happen to agree with that negatively effects a Democratic President's policy.....then he/ she is a rock star.
Where am I wrong here
You're wrong because you've resorted to hypothetical hypocrisy.
Popular
Back to top

0












