- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump co-defendant Jenna Ellis enters plea deal in Georgia case
Posted on 10/24/23 at 12:46 pm to Damone
Posted on 10/24/23 at 12:46 pm to Damone
quote:
I’m sure she totally doesn’t regret working for Trump, right? I mean why wouldn’t she, she’s gained so much and her life is definitely better than before she met Trump, right?
I’m positive she does regret it. She is being punished and prosecuted solely for the reason she worked for Trump. The Dems aren’t playing around. It is full press fascism.
0
Posted on 10/24/23 at 12:47 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
The chilling effect is exactly what they want. Imagine if you couldn’t treat your patients how. You felt would be best for them because some partisan DA somewhere might object and prosecute you.
There is no real chilling effect here.
She is not being prosecuted for "advocating for her client"; she is being prosecuted for knowingly making false statements during that advocacy.
The reason there is no real chilling effect is because lawyers are already prohibited from doing that by the rules of ethics. That is why she was censured by the Colorado bar back in March.
An attorney can spin facts any way they want in advocating for their client. But they cannot knowingly present false facts. And doing so in order to coerce legislatures to reverse an election results should be criminal.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 12:49 pm to Dday63
quote:
There is no real chilling effect here.
There absolutely is. Had she not been representing Trump and made those same exact statements in 2016 she would not have been prosecuted.
In her plea she said she was trusting more experienced attorneys, which means at the time she didn’t knowingly lie. This entire case is politically based. And you know it.
This post was edited on 10/24/23 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 10/24/23 at 12:53 pm to BBONDS25
She was a lawyer knowingly presenting false information for the purpose of overturning an election.
That should be illegal, right?
That should be illegal, right?
Posted on 10/24/23 at 12:59 pm to Dday63
quote:
There is no real chilling effect here. She is not being prosecuted for "advocating for her client"; she is being prosecuted for knowingly making false statements during that advocacy. The reason there is no real chilling effect is because lawyers are already prohibited from doing that by the rules of ethics. That is why she was censured by the Colorado bar back in March. An attorney can spin facts any way they want in advocating for their client. But they cannot knowingly present false facts. And doing so in order to coerce legislatures to reverse an election results should be criminal.
I didn’t realize that the whole water pipe break story was a lie. The claim of illegal vote counting seemed far fetched but I really thought there was some shred of truth to at least some part of these conspiracy theories.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:03 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Rons plan may end up working out for him only to lose to any dem
You have some serious DDS. Seek help.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:04 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
She was a lawyer knowingly presenting false information for the purpose of overturning an election.
That should be illegal, right?
As soon as Hillary Clinton is arrested first for doing the same.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:09 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
She was a lawyer knowingly presenting false information for the purpose of overturning an election.
That should be illegal, right?
The problem isn't the law, any more than the problem with the Jan 6 prosecutions are due to laws on the books.
The problem is using the law as a political cudgel and using politics to determine who gets charged and drug through the legal system. I suspect you're intelligent enough to understand this.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:10 pm to rmnldr
We live in the USSR.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:12 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
I’m sure she totally doesn’t regret working for Trump, right? I mean why wouldn’t she, she’s gained so much and her life is definitely better than before she met Trump, right?
Didn’t you post a quote of her stating she was relying upon information from more experienced lawyers? You even made a remark of Rudy being under the bus.
If she made this statement that means she didn’t knowingly make false statements, but relied upon info given to her by other attorneys.
This prosecution is politically based. You know that, you just don’t care. You know how many instances we can bring up of democrats knowingly providing false information. Equal application of the law is a thing. Not to you, but it should be.
This post was edited on 10/24/23 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:13 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I havent seen one person say he will win the General.
Lol what?
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:16 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
That Fulton County election workers at State Farm Arena ordered poll watchers and members of the media to leave the tabulation area on the night of November 3, 2020, and continued to operate after ordering everyone to leave;
I mean… this is pretty much true. If this is a felony false statement, I think 99% of DC would be in prison.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:16 pm to Flats
quote:
The problem is using the law as a political cudgel and using politics to determine who gets charged and drug through the legal system.
Election crimes are politically motivated and their prosecutions are going to have political ramifications. If you don't prosecute election crimes, election criminals will not be deterred.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:16 pm to TigerDoc
frick you, dumb bitch arse fig.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:19 pm to the808bass
The amount you swear is a reflection of the weakness of your sorry arguments.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:19 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Election crimes are politically motivated and their prosecutions are going to have political ramifications. If you don't prosecute election crimes, election criminals will not be deterred.
What a beautiful 180 this is. Commit election crimes to win an election. Then Use the government to jail your political
Opponents by saying they committed election crimes in trying to call out the real election crimes. Then say exactly what tiger doc just said.
Corrupt to its core. Fascism on full display.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:19 pm to the808bass
quote:
the808bass
quote:
frick you, dumb bitch arse fig.
Reduced to this.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:20 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Election crimes are politically motivated and their prosecutions are going to have political ramifications. If you don't prosecute election crimes, election criminals will not be deterred.
So you're either not intelligent enough to grasp what I'm saying or you're too dishonest to admit what's happening. Whatever; enjoy the Banana Republic bullshite our legal system has become.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:20 pm to Flats
Page 12 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News