Started By
Message

re: Trump ally Lindell wins appeal in lawsuit over $5 million 2020 election contest

Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:20 pm to
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89841 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Huge win for you guys!



Ehh, just more proof you are a retard.


Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28544 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Egg all over the faces of the law offices of Racist Boosie, SFP and Cwill




I don't think that's egg.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89841 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

this has nothing to do with the actual 2020 election

this is about a private contest about the 2020 election that Lindell ran that ended with nobody winning. the contestants were civilians and one of them sued for the prize money ( the $5 million)


It was a contest to prove him wrong about the 2020 election.

No one could.


This was about the 2020 election and data from the actual 2020 election.
Posted by psk_Vol
Nashville
Member since Jan 2012
4697 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

So you think he should just stay quiet and hand over $5M?

uhhh, what? lol

I'm saying genuine Crackheads with resources like Lindell don't just "give up" on a fight.

Really not that deep. I'm glad he won
This post was edited on 7/23/25 at 4:30 pm
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
38072 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

Trump ally Lindell wins appeal in lawsuit over $5 million 2020 election contest

Sending another MyPillow to my liberal cousins now.

Hilarity will once again ensue.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182577 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

I’m not sure I ever commented on the Lindell suit.


You have made comments about "the pillow guy" and the Dominion lawsuit.
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
26253 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:32 pm to
Good. We will still get good deals on his pillows. lol
Posted by Gifman
Clearwater Beach, FL
Member since Jan 2021
18917 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:35 pm to
All the fake lawyers on this board were wrong

Posted by tigerfan 64
in the LP
Member since Sep 2016
6490 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

Huge win for you guys!

Yep. The leftist losses are stacking up.
Enjoy em..
Posted by Wildcat1996
Lexington, KY
Member since Jul 2020
10413 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:06 pm to
Stacking e-lawyers like cord wood.

LOL
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
40237 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:18 pm to
Lol Mikey lies about the data but is gonna escape on some vague contract terminology. Nice
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:20 pm to
Melt
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
40237 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:23 pm to
We really need to work on what people claim as melts on here .
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
17431 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

Huge win for you guys!



Not really a win for me but obviously it's a crushing loss for you.

For whatever weird reason
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98294 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

Huge win for you guys!


Another big L for you. This, everything else and Sandman
Posted by DavidThibeaux
Member since Sep 2023
33 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:43 pm to
He’s been clean for years.
Posted by tigerfan 64
in the LP
Member since Sep 2016
6490 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

Lol Mikey lies about the data but is gonna escape on some vague contract terminology. Nice

You blatent fricking liar. There was no "vague contract terminology".

Per the article, the appeals judges ruled that arbitration panel CHANGED the terms of the signed contract while in arbitration.
quote:

Circuit Judges James Loken, Lavenski Smith and L. Steven Grasz concluded on Wednesday that the arbitration panel improperly amended the contest's contract terms, putting new obligations on Lindell concerning the data at issue.
“Fair or not, agreed-to contract terms may not be modified by the panel or by this court,” the appeals court said.[b]


Shove this loss up your azz.
This post was edited on 7/23/25 at 8:14 pm
Posted by bamadontcare
Member since Jun 2013
4000 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

We really need to work on what people claim as melts on here


Kinda tough to do. You melt on most of your posts.

Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
40237 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

You blatent fricking liar. There was no "vague contract terminology".

Per the article, the appeals judges ruled that arbitration panel CHANGED the terms of the signed contract while in arbitration.

Well you've read the article but seemingly don't understand how Mikes credibility is still trash even if he keeps his money(simply requires candidates name in one of 11 files as an example thanks to wording of his contest). It didn't validate that any files were actually from the election, or were the packets he claimed to have showing vote count changes ....

Posted by Gifman
Clearwater Beach, FL
Member since Jan 2021
18917 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:13 am to
quote:

oklahogjr


How bad are you crying right now?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram