Started By
Message

re: “Trump 45 was better than Trump 47”

Posted on 10/8/26 at 8:01 pm to
Posted by 4quartaBamaball
Milky Way Galaxy
Member since Nov 2015
2169 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 8:01 pm to
How much do they pay you a week?

It's gotta be decent for you to cuck this hard
Posted by GeorgePaton
God's Country
Member since May 2017
6145 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

Trump 45 was better than Trump 47


The mafia democrats had plenty time to prepare for Trump 47. As in they were able to organize their army of activist federal judges to stall - stop - injunction - Trump 47. When he won in 2024 they were ready for him and immediately set about stopping his effort to "drain the swamp"

Then there was the two soul sistas (NY - Letitia James) and (Fulton Country Georgia DA - Fani Willis) and their soul brotha Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg who pounced on President Trump at once. Wow! What a Chinese Fire Drill that turned out to be. I believe there were even allegations they were coordinating their efforts through our AG pal Derrick Garland. They tried everything to "Get Trump". When all that failed, "the Club" sent an assassin to kill him (followed by three more attempts)

I even recall in early Trump 47 Chuck You Schumer bragging that they had their judges ready to pounce on him.

I mean look at the Lawfare debacle during Trump 45 and Trump 47.

He (Trump) be the EVERREADY RABBIT he just keep on keeping on. Dude got iron testicles.


This post was edited on 10/8/26 at 8:10 pm
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
58282 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 8:11 pm to
47 has been far better than 45. Trump just didn’t know what he didn’t know during 45. He learned fast, though.
Posted by AC1221
Member since May 2025
277 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:02 pm to
So, months long military action against terrorists during his 1st term is different from a months long military action against terrorists in his 2nd term?

Interesting.

Your position is that we should have just let Itan kill Americans and attack our ships and bases with no repercussion?

Also interesting.

Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
44985 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:04 pm to
They both sucked.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
176351 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

Notice how beefense, bunk and Boosie all commented yet we know they’ve never voted for Trump.

Now you're complaining that people are responding to your threads?
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
41719 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

So, months long military action against terrorists during his 1st term is different from a months long military action against terrorists in his 2nd term?

Interesting.

Your position is that we should have just let Itan kill Americans and attack our ships and bases with no repercussion?

Also interesting.


We shouldn't have bases over there to begin with.

Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
71129 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

Your position is that we should have just let Itan kill Americans and attack our ships and bases with no repercussion?

We started this conflict, what did you expect to happen? Maybe we shouldn't play world police.
Posted by AC1221
Member since May 2025
277 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:13 pm to
I agree, but that's neither here nor there.

If it weren't for the mullahs and the IRGC maybe it would stabilize over there and we could exit that region.

Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
41719 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

I agree, but that's neither here nor there.

If it weren't for the mullahs and the IRGC maybe it would stabilize over there and we could exit that region.



The best way to get rid of them is to stop attacking the country and leave the area.

We give them power by being there and playing the "Great Satan". If we were no longer the enemy that unifies them, then the government wouldn't have someone to blame.

If Russia attacked us constantly, we'd just rally around the guys screaming death to Russia. Russia isn't a worry, so we don't support the guys screaming death to Russia.

Aside from keeping naval passages clear, no reason to be in the area at all.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
38105 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:19 pm to
What’s the issue with the mullahs and IRGC? As I understand it, we’ve been lied to and they’re not actually problematic towards us or anyone else, outside of tens of thousands of their own citizens, who may receive a little slap on the wrist every now and then. Depending on their moods, maybe even a beheading or two. If you’re really lucky you’ll catch an authentic stoning of a woman for screwing up supper.
Posted by AC1221
Member since May 2025
277 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:24 pm to
We started this conflict???
Youre shitting me, right?

Did the 36 Americans killed on Oct 7th "start it?"
All the Iranian assasination plots alone should have been enough to justify military action.
They were killing Americans, attacking ships and bases well before we started bombing them.

Why can't one of you just come out and say you're cool with Iran killing Americans and having nukes?

Don't keep dancing around in the shadows, be a man and say it.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
71129 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:27 pm to
Let me guess, it's a 47 year war, right? Why not just go back to 1953 when we ran a coup? You neocon interventionists will find any reason to start conflict. 10/07 is not our issue. Go look at the Bari Weiss thread, most people rolled their eyes at what she said.
This post was edited on 10/8/26 at 9:28 pm
Posted by AC1221
Member since May 2025
277 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:31 pm to
You think if we packed up l, China wouldn't immediately enter the Strait and do the same thing they've been doing with the Houthis in the Red Sea?
Where Chinese ships, carrying Chinese goods are the only ships allowed through unmolested?
I mean, you think not was a coincidence that we attacked just days after Iran made a deal with China for anti-ship supersonic missiles (destroyer destroyers?)
You don't think that was the plan for Hormuz?

So, we keep ships for naval passage, Iran or its proxies attack our ships (just like they did in the Red Sea) with those supersonic missiles, then what? What's our next move? Pay them off like Obama and Biden did?
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
41719 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

You think if we packed up l, China wouldn't immediately enter the Strait and do the same thing they've been doing with the Houthis in the Red Sea?
Where Chinese ships, carrying Chinese goods are the only ships allowed through unmolested?
I mean, you think not was a coincidence that we attacked just days after Iran made a deal with China for anti-ship supersonic missiles (destroyer destroyers?)
You don't think that was the plan for Hormuz?


I don't care about China, and generally no.

quote:


So, we keep ships for naval passage, Iran or its proxies attack our ships (just like they did in the Red Sea) with those supersonic missiles, then what? What's our next move? Pay them off like Obama and Biden did?


They wouldn't have a reason to attack us.
Posted by AC1221
Member since May 2025
277 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:48 pm to
46 dead Americans isn't our issue?

3 assasination plots aren't our issue?

3 dead US soldiers stationed in Jordan in 2024 isn't our issue?

Attacks on the USN isn't our issue?


Posted by AC1221
Member since May 2025
277 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:54 pm to
It's not so much caring about China as it is caring about the petrol dollar.
You know that's the only thing keeping our whole house of cards up, right?

They wouldn't have reson to attack us?
With our Navy patrolling the Strait? They've been attacking our bases, unprovoked, in neighboring countries for years.

Solomeini and the Quds Force also had no reason to hunt US troops in Iraq, killing and maiming thousands with IEDs either, but they did.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
38105 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

Solomeini and the Quds Force also had no reason to hunt US troops in Iraq, killing and maiming thousands with IEDs either, but they did.

They had their “reasons.” Same bullshite that still rains deeply seeded among many today. Many of those “many” being of the most dangerous and capable sort.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
41719 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

It's not so much caring about China as it is caring about the petrol dollar.
You know that's the only thing keeping our whole house of cards up, right?



No, the petro dollar and the federal reserve system is a system of economic slavery and does not favors for any citizens of the US.

I hope it falls. The idea it's propping up anything more than the American Empire is absurd.

quote:


They wouldn't have reson to attack us?
With our Navy patrolling the Strait? They've been attacking our bases, unprovoked, in neighboring countries for years.

Solomeini and the Quds Force also had no reason to hunt US troops in Iraq, killing and maiming thousands with IEDs either, but they did.


Our navy has no reason to patrol the strait.

And we have no business being in the area with bases. We would and do act in the exact same way if Russia started building bases around us.
Posted by AC1221
Member since May 2025
277 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 10:15 pm to
They will always have "a reason."
But I guess we should just go your route and let them do what they want with zero consequences.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram