- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:06 pm to lsuguy84
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:06 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
Those are consenting adults in those circumstances. We’re in uncharted territory here, with impressionable children, and “adults” making irreversible, life-altering decisions for them.
I'm not addressing the specifics on this particular case, just why cases like Loving will need to be part of the analysis.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:07 pm to Paddyshack
quote:
No, these are not the same "operative nucleus" as allowing children to be mutilated under the guise of morality and affirmation.

Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:08 pm to OWLFAN86
And like a moth to a flame.
Go roll your eyes somewhere else.
Go roll your eyes somewhere else.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:08 pm to OMLandshark
Sex change for kids is the modern day “gay conversion therapy”. Prove me wrong
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:08 pm to Paddyshack
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/11/26 at 9:21 pm
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:12 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I wish there were cameras in the courtroom so I could have looked at Clarence Thomas’ face when she said that.

Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
And you wonder why people accuse you of being pro groomer.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:13 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:13 pm to OMLandshark
She’s wrong.
F her.
F her.
This post was edited on 12/4/24 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:14 pm to Rebel
quote:
And you wonder why people accuse you of being pro groomer.
I made no comment on the underlying case, sex changes for kids, or anything associated with "grooming".
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:14 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Also isn’t this also the same retard can’t define woman because she’s not a biologist?
She wasn’t smart enough to avoid accidentally admitting it’s based on biology.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:16 pm to OMLandshark
Then I assume she also agrees that minors can buy and consume alcohol or any other of the list of things people under the age of 18 typically can’t do,
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:23 pm to OMLandshark
Then the stupid bitch should be immediately removed from the SCOTUS.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:27 pm to OMLandshark
We have a some basic curves that emperical evidence has proven true:
- FAFO
- Hot vs. Crazy
We have a new one to add to the list:
- Leftist vs. Retard: the further left you are, the dumber you are.
- FAFO
- Hot vs. Crazy
We have a new one to add to the list:
- Leftist vs. Retard: the further left you are, the dumber you are.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:29 pm to I20goon
Anyone that thinks someone under the age 18 should be able to do this needs to be institutionalized.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 1:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:no of course not. Very shocking
I'm not addressing the specifics on this particular case, j
Posted on 12/4/24 at 1:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I made no comment on the underlying case, sex changes for kids, or anything associated with "grooming".
Posted on 12/4/24 at 1:23 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
no of course not. Very shocking
Wasn't necessary to explain the references.
I even gave referential support via Clarence Thomas
Popular
Back to top



1





