- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:26 pm to Geauxgurt
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:26 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
So just as was the case with Roe V. Wade, he is making the distinction that you cannot create rights out of thin air by claiming privacy, and that judicial legislation should is wrong.
And I specifically covered that with this:
quote:
Not specifically, but a lot of these discussions will devolve back to Loving and Griswold because they all rely on the same operative nucleus of legal rhetoric.
quote:
Again, its not whether you believe that people should or should not have those rights, but just because bad precedent exists going against logic, does not mean that we should stick to them.
And that is exactly why she brought them up, but making the point that we should stick to them. As I said, they're all from the same operative nuclear of legal rhetoric.
0
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:26 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
I'd imagine there could be action taken by 47 DOJ to SCOTUS.
You continue to live in an absolutely sad fantasy world.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:27 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
slowmo taking Ls in another thread
You thinking that was me taking an "L" speaks a lot more about you than me.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:45 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Ketanji Brown Jackson thinks
I can see no evidence of such.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:no no of course not you never do because every thread you take up is a loser and even you know that so you dance away from the actual topic and larp your way through some bullshite irrelevant argument without every having to address the actual facts in thread.
I never spoke directly on that issue, so this comment is irrelevant.
KBJ sounds like an actual moron and you can't defend that so you "well akctully" your way to 20 pages and declare victory. You're an absolute coward and a clown and everyone can see it but you.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I never spoke directly on that issue
We know. What’s new
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:55 pm to DawgCountry
quote:This is when you know he's losing. He abandons the field and redigs his trenches somewhere else and declares victory
We know. What’s new
Posted on 12/4/24 at 5:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You thinking that was me taking an "L" speaks a lot more about you than me.
quote:
I'm not addressing the specifics on this particular case,
quote:
I made no comment on the underlying case, sex changes for kids, or anything associated with "grooming".
quote:3 punts on the actual thread topic 4 pages in. Bloviating on irrelevant shite is your singular talent.
I never spoke directly on that issue, so this comment is irrelevant.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 5:22 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
no no of course not you never do because every thread you take up is a loser and even you know that so you dance away from the actual topic and larp your way through some bullshite irrelevant argument without every having to address the actual facts in thread.
What a melt.
I explained legal concepts to people who clearly needed the help.
That does not require a personal opinion.
The world is not this binary black/white scenario where a person who doesn't repeat your NPC silliness is on the opposing team.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 5:22 pm to UncleFestersLegs
the context that the op started with is that the KBJackson Justice impersonator is to stupid . Well even more stupid than Harris.
SFP is argueing about every thing other than KBJ being stupid, which is standard fare for lawyers. If neither the facts or the law are on your side, just argue. Billable hours thing
SFP is argueing about every thing other than KBJ being stupid, which is standard fare for lawyers. If neither the facts or the law are on your side, just argue. Billable hours thing
Posted on 12/4/24 at 5:23 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
. Bloviating on irrelevant shite
I specifically addressed the topics discussed in the original post by a confused OML.
How is that irrelevant?
Posted on 12/4/24 at 5:25 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
the context that the op started with is that the KBJackson Justice impersonator is to stupid .
Your right
quote:
SFP is argueing about every thing other than KBJ being stupid
I'm pointing out that this football spiking is probably premature. People seem very confused at the legal issues in play and the larger point she's making, so I'm explaining it to them.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 5:26 pm to OMLandshark
Since she can't define the word woman, she should recuse herself
Posted on 12/4/24 at 5:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
Yeah no
I often defend you on here Slow but her expansion of a 14th Amendment changing genders is not the same as the right to marry an adult of your choosing
There are no rights that a man has that a woman doesn't
so changing your sex doesn't avail you of or deny you specific rights that aren't already available to you
She's a stupid count
Don't try to use your law knowledge on me
[
I often defend you on here Slow but her expansion of a 14th Amendment changing genders is not the same as the right to marry an adult of your choosing
There are no rights that a man has that a woman doesn't
so changing your sex doesn't avail you of or deny you specific rights that aren't already available to you
She's a stupid count
Don't try to use your law knowledge on me
[
Posted on 12/4/24 at 5:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
If "being stupid" is a legal issue, try constraining your response to stupid issues
Posted on 12/4/24 at 7:30 pm to Trevaylin
Posted on 12/4/24 at 7:35 pm to OMLandshark
Bless her heart
Posted on 12/4/24 at 7:39 pm to CAD703X
quote:
Isn't she the math genius who figured out how to land on the moon too?
No
Posted on 12/4/24 at 7:40 pm to VoxDawg
Which is kind of the point I was making that a man or a woman doesn't have different rights under the Constitution dependent upon sex/gender
Sure will miss Clarence when he retires
Sure will miss Clarence when he retires
Posted on 12/4/24 at 7:41 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Ketanji Brown Jackson thinks
Stop right there
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News