Started By
Message
locked post

.

Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:52 am
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:52 am
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/11/26 at 9:23 pm
Posted by Gifman
Clearwater Beach, FL
Member since Jan 2021
18881 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:53 am to
DEI hires gonna DEI
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
19864 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:54 am to
She should recuse herself on any case regarding sex/gender. She doesn't even know what sex she is.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
143804 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:54 am to
SFP will be along shortly to white knight for her / him.
Posted by Heirofslytherin88
Member since Dec 2024
107 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:55 am to
Good thing for me then I don’t believe in either one
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:48 am to
Black woman with three names = trouble
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
93289 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:53 am to
Isn't she the math genius who figured out how to land on the moon too?
Posted by tommy2tone1999
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2008
7795 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:55 am to
So now she's a biologist?
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
196560 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:56 am to
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
157776 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:56 am to
I hope the Decatur and Tiger Doc Klan are proud of this idiot.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476637 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:59 am to
quote:

SFP will be along shortly to white knight for her / him.


Not specifically, but a lot of these discussions will devolve back to Loving and Griswold because they all rely on the same operative nucleus of legal rhetoric.

And don't take my word for it, listen to Clarence Thomas on the issue

LINK

quote:

Justice Clarence Thomas argued in a concurring opinion released on Friday that the Supreme Court “should reconsider” its past rulings codifying rights to contraception access, same-sex relationships and same-sex marriage.

The sweeping suggestion from the current court’s longest-serving justice came in the concurring opinion he authored in response to the court’s ruling revoking the constitutional right to abortion, also released on Friday.

In his concurring opinion, Thomas — an appointee of President George H.W. Bush — wrote that the justices “should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell” — referring to three cases having to do with Americans’ fundamental privacy, due process and equal protection rights.
Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
11063 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:59 am to
So Clarence Thomas is most certainly a proponent of banning sex changes for children.

Clarence Thomas is also in an interracial marriage.

She has to be the dumbest SCJ in history.
Posted by themunch
bottom of the list
Member since Jan 2007
71936 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:00 pm to
Is this the one who could not say what a woman IS?
Posted by Audustxx
Member since Jul 2022
2373 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:00 pm to
If she wasn’t black she wouldn’t be very smart
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
68544 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Ketanji Brown Jackson

is a legit retard like Harris
Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
11063 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:01 pm to
quote:


Is this the one who could not say what a woman IS?

Correct. She was either too cowardly or too stupid to say what a woman is.

But somehow she believes it's okay to chop off a confused little boy's penis. And it's the same thing as allowing interracial marriage.
This post was edited on 12/4/24 at 12:02 pm
Posted by lsuguy84
Madisonville
Member since Feb 2009
27388 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Justice Clarence Thomas argued in a concurring opinion released on Friday that the Supreme Court “should reconsider” its past rulings codifying rights to contraception access, same-sex relationships and same-sex marriage


Those are consenting adults in those circumstances. We’re in uncharted territory here, with impressionable children, and “adults” making irreversible, life-altering decisions for them.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
23781 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:03 pm to
Any Senator that voted for her to be confirmed as a damn Supreme Court judge should be relieved of their Senate seat.

Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
11063 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Not specifically, but a lot of these discussions will devolve back to Loving and Griswold because they all rely on the same operative nucleus of legal rhetoric.

No, these are not the same "operative nucleus" as allowing children to be mutilated under the guise of morality and affirmation.

Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
16709 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:06 pm to
Not surprising coming from the DEI hire.

This clown is exactly why Trump should implement the democrats threat to pack the SCOTUS with about 10-12 more ultra conservative justices.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram