Started By
Message

re: There is no Constitutional Right in the United States to protest!

Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:00 pm to
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
20897 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Hence the difference, that most sane people understand, between peaceful protest and committing violent acts.


At what point is volume considered violent?

I’m thinking of the Asian lady who ruins Toomer’s Corner in Auburn every day with her ridiculous screaming at anyone walking by.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55557 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Stupid fricking law. As are all of them, no matter the state/locality.

Okay, so your disagreement is that the laws are ill advised, not that they are unconstitutional? That’ would be a matter of opinion. That it is unconstitutional would be wrong as a matter of fact. That’s what I thought you meant.

As to your opinion, do you really believe that the public should not be able to control someone standing in a public place and yelling obscenities?
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21748 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

That’s weird… Trump just pardoned a whole bunch of people who did the exact opposite


That's weird... those people were actually protesting government at the government's place of business. Weirder still was how they were let in and so many were just waltzing through within the roped barriers.

I guess they oughta have been in the streets blocking traffic and impeding, well, everyone and everything.

Or at a Hilton harassing their own neighbors and visitors.

Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
16714 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

1A interpretation has gotten out of hand.


Like everything else it's been perverted by the left.

Worse yet, no one on the right seems to have the "nads' to right the ship. Or make the omelet, even if it means cracking some eggs.
Posted by Swamp Angel
West Georgia Chicken Farm Territory
Member since Jul 2004
10185 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:04 pm to
quote:


“No screaming obscenities”

But that pesky 1A, though.


Screaming obscenities would amount to disturbing the peace which, as far as I know, is a misdemeanor in most jurisdictions, and therefore essentially against the law. Enforcing it is not tantamount to infringing upon anyone's 1A rights.
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
5488 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:04 pm to
The fact that half the country became convinced overnight that a person could use their car to block police activity without experiencing repercussions should make us all stop and think.

Are there any limits to how stupid TDS makes people?
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
5488 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

“No screaming obscenities” But that pesky 1A, though. Some of this crap is just counterproductive. You can argue the problems with what’s going on in MN without venturing into idiotic takes to undermine the Bill of Rights


This is obviously based on the context.
If you scream obscenities in a cops face in a chaotic environment as part of a group that is actively inhibiting enforcement of the law, that’s not necessarily a valid use of the 1st Amendment.
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
6092 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

those people were actually protesting government at the government's place of business.


A riot a riot … wherever it takes place it becomes the government’s business
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21748 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

A riot a riot … wherever it takes place it becomes the government’s business


Fair.

Difference is when conservatives want to exercise their 1st amendment... they don't do it by harassing their neighbors.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35926 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:16 pm to
Nothing about blowing rape whistles, dog cussing with shameful obscenities and aggressively interfering with law enforcement is congruent with “peaceful”.

It might possibly be “nonviolent” but it is hardly “peaceful”.
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
20073 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

The First Amendment does not give one the right to shout obscenities.

Where do you people come from?

Canada or the UK
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91524 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

This is something that definitely needs to be clearly outlined
Only helps if the bad actors are arrested.

Are we arresting bad actors?
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
73081 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:18 pm to
quote:


“No screaming obscenities”

But that pesky 1A, though.


There absolutely are laws and ordinances in this country regarding obscenities. That is not a protected speech.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49529 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

undermine the Bill of Rights.

The asshats in MN are the ones undermining the Bill of Rights

There IS no constitutional right to aggressively affront OTHER PEOPLE because YOU are not happy. Those other people have rights too. THEY have the right to go about their business without having to be inconvenienced by idiots.

What they are doing should not be allowed - by any common understanding of how to maintain a peaceful society.

Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21748 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

Are we arresting bad actors?


I wish.

Clarifying the clause of the 1A that speaks to peaceable assembly would help.

Having an action that if done by ONE is illegal, but becomes legal once done by a dozen on the basis of "assembly", is problematic and needs clear definition.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35926 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Those other people have rights too


Isn’t it funny that the party of “tolerance and empathy” actually gives exactly zero fricks about anyone but themselves. They are toddlers having a temper tantrum.
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
6092 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Difference is when conservatives want to exercise their 1st amendment... they don't do it by harassing their neighbors.


This sentiment makes no sense…so no one is harassed(whatever that means) by a conservative protest??… what would be the point of said protest???
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91524 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:23 pm to
The definitions and laws exist.

Enforce them.

Or don’t I guess.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
23111 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:24 pm to
Biden had one, thought it was a vibrator and has suffered since. It was a gift from Corn Pop.

g]
This post was edited on 1/26/26 at 12:37 pm
Posted by Dirk Dawgler
Georgia
Member since Nov 2011
4303 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:24 pm to
Yes. Like misdemeanor disorderly conduct and misdemeanor public nuisance.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram