- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: There is a big fight on X about Josh Hammer calling for Tucker to be “neutralized”.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:04 am to GumboPot
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:04 am to GumboPot
Neutralizing a person, threat, asset, etc… has often been accepted to mean kill them. And anyone claiming otherwise isn’t being honest.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:11 am to Riverside
quote:
we've created a Gollum. It is a problem."
For a kid who probably never has never read Tolkien & thinks George Martin’s Game of Thrones is superior to Lord of the Rings, of course he’s going to misuse a Tolkien character.
And he so fundamentally doesn’t understand memes, which puts him squarely on the side of the left.
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 6:13 am
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:21 am to Riverside
quote:
Josh Hammer is a legal scholar and former federal law clerk. If he wanted to euphemistically call for the death of Tucker Carlson, he would have used a different word. Neutralize does not mean or connote killing or death.
How he meant it is less critical than how some unhinged left winger takes it to mean
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:34 am to FredBear
quote:
How he meant it is less critical than how some unhinged left winger takes it to mean
He worded it the way he worded it for a reason. He knew what he was doing. frick that guy.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:39 am to GumboPot
Yeah "neutralized" is a soft way of saying "kill". Anyone with a brain and sense of culture knows this.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:45 am to 3down10
quote:
You get labeled things like antisemitic when you know it's not true
quote:
He goes too far with "Jews" and that's why I don't listen to him.
?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:53 am to Riverside
quote:
Trust me when I tell you, Josh Hammer has done more to advance the cause of liberty and freedom than most
Dude…just go away
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:55 am to GumboPot
The essence of Tucker’s power is in his use of Words. And open debate, which goes on via millions of counter argumentative ‘neutralization’ every single day. The contextual jist of this very sophisticated ’debater’s use of the statement “needs to be neutralized “ is obviously intended to be by some means OTHER than the common debate neutralization that takes place every single day. He should own the spirit of his words, and may. “He that leadeth into captivity, goeth into captivity “. Meaning that whatever one proposes and promotes, one will receive. “As ye judge, so shall ye be judged “. Or ‘what goes around comes around’.
Best way to learn is to get some of it. Hammer had better watch his mouth.
Best way to learn is to get some of it. Hammer had better watch his mouth.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:07 am to RCDfan1950
n/m
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 7:17 am
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:10 am to GumboPot
Honest question..Who is Josh Hammer?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:19 am to GumboPot
quote:
Normally this kind of word usage would not ring alarm bells. However the day before Charlie”s assassination Josh retweeted this:
One of the YouTube podcasts addressed this “conspiracy” and hammer was referring to the psycho that killed the Ukrainian girl on the bus.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:33 am to GumboPot
Public executions are but public viewing of sanctioned killings of major crimes by a government that goes on in prisons. That is what Trump referred to a Hammer qualified as “based”. Neutralizing when talking about another is generally considered reducing the effectiveness of. Now if you’re underworld or 3 letter agencies that would raise the level of meaning a bit more as they play the ending of the effectiveness
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:37 am to Neutral Underground
quote:
I like Nick Fuentes. You probably believe he is "toxic" because the propaganda worked on you. Nick's interview with Tucker was very informative. What are not supposed to watch Nick Fuentes because a certain tribe gets their panties in a twist?
Fuentes is a shitbird.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:37 am to GumboPot
quote:
Normally this kind of word usage would not ring alarm bells. However the day before Charlie”s assassination Josh retweeted this:
Was that the signal for Robinson to act or was Hammer the shooter?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:39 am to GumboPot
Tucker is an entertainer. Nothing more.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:40 am to Riverside
quote:
clerk. If he wanted to euphemistically call for the death of Tucker Carlson, he would have used a different word. Neutralize does not mean or connote killing or death.
So what does neutralize mean in 2025 America?
Silenced?
Jailed?
In a free speech nation how else would someone be “neutralized” that doesn’t involve prison or death?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:42 am to jlnoles79
quote:
Was that the signal for Robinson to act or was Hammer the shooter?
The "conspiracy theorists" say it was foreknowledge.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:44 am to GumboPot
quote:
The "conspiracy theorists" say it was foreknowledge.
Groyper twitter
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:45 am to GumboPot
Hammer called Tucker Carlson the most dangerous man in America. This guy's entire political ideology is wrapped up in only one issue. And it has absolutely nothing to do with Americans.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:46 am to GumboPot
Seems like Hammer should just say he used a poor choice of words and move on.
Popular
Back to top



0







