- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The WEF’s march towards Agenda 2030 continues in the Netherlands…
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:18 am to BrianKellysbuyout
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:18 am to BrianKellysbuyout
quote:
Who pays for maintenance on the car? Who insures the car? What if there is a conflict with the use of the car or an emergency?
LINK
quote:
Residents in the Dutch city of Utrecht have long understood that vibrant cities and lots of cars don’t really mix; Utrecht first experimented with temporarily closing streets in its city center to vehicles in 1965.
Prior to the formation of the WEF
quote:
Today, a pedestrianized city center is the norm, and Utrecht, along with most of the Netherlands, is known for being bicycle-friendly. Still, vehicles tend to dictate the design of most public space there, as with most cities in the world. The architects of a newly proposed neighborhood called Merwede want to change that, though, by giving residents everything they need within walking distance.
Merwede will be home to 12,000 people on a nearly 60-acre site in southwest Utrecht, with a focus on pedestrians and cyclists, and with public transportation that connects to all parts of the Netherlands. A fleet of shared cars and bicycles will be available to everyone living there. Instead of one (or multiple) cars per household, filling the streets with congestion and parking spaces, Merwede will have one car for every three households.
quote:
More than a third of Utrecht’s 1.3 million people already bike to the city center daily,
It appears that the "one in three" language is because there is a parking garage away from the city center that only has enough space for 1 car per resident. I don't see anything about this "shared" car program other than the video in OP.
0
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:20 am to tide06
quote:
But it’s true because the same people have been ripping out roads, limiting vehicle use in city “centres” due to carbon footprints, eliminating parking and not allowing the use or sale of ICE engines in some areas.
Or because these cities were created prior to cars and were created for a population who didn't use them, creating a different culture than in America where we have infinite space in most places.
quote:
In effect they’re banning private vehicles without formally banning private vehicles,
Update: this is not true.
It's also voluntary. I doubt people moving to this district are the types to be pro-car.
quote:
But they want to depopulate the surrounding areas over time a
Utrecht is a major city in Ned already
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:45 am to SlowFlowPro
These threads.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:50 am to Placekicker
Sounds like the capital city for big time major cucks.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:58 am to Placekicker
I assumed this kind of thing was already going on here, there, and yonder in Western Europe on their on accord 
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:58 am to Smeg
When the Muzzies take over you will have to share your woman.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 9:18 am to tide06
quote:
It’s just a stepping stone towards what they’ve already told us they want: the elimination of private transportation.
They don’t even want us buying new clothes at will.
That’s not my opinion: it’s in their books.
You don’t have to convince me. There is a big difference between forcing people to live that way and folks just choosing to.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 9:22 am to Placekicker
Will the other residents be forced to help clock boy with his modifications in the name of diversity?
Posted on 6/1/26 at 9:47 am to Placekicker
It likely will not work... but it is far more likely to work in a completely homogenous society
Posted on 6/1/26 at 9:50 am to Placekicker
It's one neighborhood. If they find people that want to live there it works. If they don't then it doesn't work.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 9:51 am to Placekicker
How does that work when co-owners Knut & Ingrid take the car on a week-long drive around Europe? frick the other two households?
Who fills it up, who does maintenance?
Who fills it up, who does maintenance?
Posted on 6/1/26 at 9:55 am to Bard
I've told you guys before. Quit responding to the NED bot.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 9:56 am to Bunk Moreland
Oh wow, 5 of the first 8 posts in this threads by some of the dumbest, immoral, disgusting tards to ever exist on this board. And the biggest immoral, disgusting tard posted twice. One after another.
Spunk likes to give Morehead you will like this one…..
bunch of damn RETARDS all of you.
Spunk likes to give Morehead you will like this one…..
bunch of damn RETARDS all of you.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 9:58 am to whereishobson
quote:
Oh wow, 5 of the first 8 posts in this threads by some of the dumbest, immoral, disgusting tards to ever exist on this board. And the biggest immoral, disgusting tard posted twice. One after another.
You’re so mad. I find it funny too how the “dumbest” posters were the ones who actually did two minutes of research on this neighborhood instead of trusting a random X rage bait post. I’m still laughing at “immoral” and “disgusting”.
This post was edited on 6/1/26 at 10:01 am
Posted on 6/1/26 at 10:00 am to Bard
quote:
How does that work when co-owners Knut & Ingrid take the car on a week-long drive around Europe? frick the other two households?
Who fills it up, who does maintenance?
How would those same things work if Bard co-owned a car with someone else?
Posted on 6/1/26 at 10:03 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
How would those same things work if Bard co-owned a car with someone else?
Bard has enough sense not to attempt to share ownership of vehicles with other families.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 10:03 am to Placekicker
Globalist's utopian dream. It could work there though, they are using trains, feet and bikes to get around.
It just be touted as a successful model like when all the socialist all love to cite the Nordic countries for their dreams.
Of course, much like their homogenous socialism, this would never work here.
It just be touted as a successful model like when all the socialist all love to cite the Nordic countries for their dreams.
Of course, much like their homogenous socialism, this would never work here.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 10:05 am to Bard
quote:
Bard has enough sense not to attempt to share ownership of vehicles with other families.
Ok. I would not imagine that it’s very common in the Netherlands either.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 10:08 am to Placekicker
Isnt this old?
I mean they dont really drive in Amsterdam. Its all bikes and tram
I mean they dont really drive in Amsterdam. Its all bikes and tram
Posted on 6/1/26 at 10:10 am to Mo Jeaux
Are you happy to be immoral and disgusting. You probably go to sleep at night with your queer boyfriends poop on your penis. Reason why you are immoral and disgusting.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News