- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The thing that frustrates me about immigration policy. One party has unfair advantage
Posted on 2/1/26 at 4:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/1/26 at 4:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Good grief for an attorney you are ignorant. The constitution empowers the executive. The judicial and legislative branches are similarly defined by the constitution and serve as a counter-balance
Wrong
1
Posted on 2/1/26 at 4:40 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
The constitution empowers the executive.
I'll just go through the entire discussion right now.
I'll ask you to quote the section from the Constitution that specifically authorizes the executive to do anything relating to immigration.
You won't be able to.
Then I will quote the sections in the Constitution authorizing Congress domain in this area.
Then I will quote you immigration statutes that do grant authority to the executive.
Then I will ask you who passed those statutes and the answer will be.... Congress.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 4:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
Then you will continue masturbating over your killer win.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 4:49 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
You’ve come a long way since the 2016 election.
Most of us all know why nothing was done to stop the flood of illegals into the country.
It had to be this way. NCSWIS.
Most of us all know why nothing was done to stop the flood of illegals into the country.
It had to be this way. NCSWIS.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 4:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As with most problems, the problem is too much government,. specifically here, permitting so much discretion to the executive. We need more strict interpretation of executive power given by Congress
You could make this argument for any branch. Seems the judicial branch has gone off the rails more then anything else lately
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:04 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
The Dems are amassing a huge get out the vote effort from their western front and already stating that if they win GOP, religious, conservative and MAGA heads will roll. They will stack the voting rolls with immigrants, gerrymander districts, reinstate DEI and reverse everything Trump has done. Ours to lose. Double our efforts now.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:13 pm to Jbird
quote:
Then you will continue masturbating over your killer win.
As he conveniently forgets all his losses......SloMoFo.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
people like me will get the say
quote:
only permits the best of the best to participate in decision making
Excuse me?
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:17 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Biden was allowed to let in 7 million illegals between 2021 and 2024
That’s a huge underrepresentation.
I think it is deliberate.
frick your for your dishonest gaslighting bullshite.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
All you did was reinforce my argument. The Constitution delineates powers among the branches of government. Not the Congress. They pass the laws. Executive enforces them. Judicial interprets them when necessary.
Good grief you are an insufferable moron.
Good grief you are an insufferable moron.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:17 pm to Jbird
He would have to get a killer win to actually pleasure himself over it.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:18 pm to Wolfhound45
It's his world Wolf we are just visiting.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:21 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Excuse me?
He brought up IQ and other qualities, not me
For the sake of argument, benefit of the doubt, etc. , a 100 IQ cutoff will mean 50% of MAGA don't get to vote.
The higher the IQ, the more who get excluded.
Tell that half/group that I get to decide for them and see the reacts.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
the problem is too much government,. specifically here, permitting so much discretion to the executive. We need more strict interpretation of executive power given by Congress.
The issue he is talking about is the judicial with no checks and balances. A rogue judge has absolutely nothing to keep it in check. The executive has checks and balances, if there were an even judicial branch, 7M illegals would have never made it in the country in the first place.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:22 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
The Constitution delineates powers among the branches of government.
I'm still waiting for you to cite the language in it giving immigration authority to the Executive
quote:
They pass the laws. Executive enforces them.
So they get to enforce what Congress permits.
Thanks.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:24 pm to BrianKellysbuyout
quote:
The issue he is talking about is the judicial with no checks and balances
Is he? Where?
quote:
if there were an even judicial branch, 7M illegals would have never made it in the country in the first place.
...how?
I think you're citing hypothetical judicial overreach you were just complaining about.
This post was edited on 2/1/26 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:26 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Do you think Trump would've been better off to back the Lankford bill during Biden than opposing it?
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
Not judicial over rich in that case. C'mon, you're smarter than that.
An uneven judiciary, and honestly a reckless republican legislative branch.
An uneven judiciary, and honestly a reckless republican legislative branch.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:28 pm to TigerDoc
Leftist deflection.
Is the country better off with state sanctioned unfettered illegal immigration.
Please don’t dispute the phrase illegal immigrationn
Is the country better off with state sanctioned unfettered illegal immigration.
Please don’t dispute the phrase illegal immigrationn
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:31 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Do you think Trump would've been better off to back the Lankford bill during Biden than opposing it?
No. That bill would have allowed way more border crossings than the current situation.
I’m not worried about the border. Border crossings are basically 0 right now.
It’s the 7 million folks within the country who, in my view, are being given unfair protections not grounded in current law or constitution
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News