- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The SPLC paid $70,000 to the leader of the American Nazi Party, then listed him as
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:19 pm to Nurbis
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:19 pm to Nurbis
quote:
Everything you listed is public information. How did they expose it? And why did they have to pay him $70,000 to do so?
And who's to say he gave them real info? He probably saw them as idiots giving him free money.
0
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:24 pm to Jbird
quote:
Dude has 117 posts since 7:30 last night. SlowSPLCPro putting in the effort!
All those posts and he can't even tell us why he doesn't like the SPLC.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. I specifically said multiple times it was used for content by the SPLC and there is a question what information made it to LEO.
Your first post, chief.
quote:
So they paid him to snitch, then used the information he gave them to expose both him and his organization.
I don't think the SPLC donors will consider this to be fraud.
quote:
I said expose, which is nothing close to "bring the organization down."
quote:
Specific reference to content only
Another post I link the content.
Another post I respond to an unsupported, likely dishonest allegation asking for their support/basis.
Your first post tells the tale, punk rock lawyer. Everything else is you defending, then trying to find a way to change your story so you don't have to apologize for being wrong. Quite the narcissist you are, and based on what? Your "lawyer" job?
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So they paid him to snitch, then used the information he gave them to expose both him and his organization.
Don’t make up the details to fit the narrative
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:29 pm to AlterEd
quote:
It seems obvious that he is. For two days straight now this guy has hounded this topic relentlessly. I made a thread that he pretty much single handedly drove to over 25 pages in length carrying water for these people who are paying white supremacists large sums of money to plan hate rallies. No rational person would be this invested in such a topic.
It's because of the volume of the dishonesty and unsupported stuff coming out. We'll try with one example.
Do we all agree this statement is unsupported by the indictment and/or dishonest?
quote:
the SPLC—the group that planned, organized, & paid for the Charlottesville white supremacist rally.
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:30 pm to BugAC
quote:
Your first post tells the tale, punk rock lawyer.
Yes I said they exposed the group. That's factually correct and not the same was "bringing it down"
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:30 pm to loogaroo
quote:And hard working tax paying citizens paid for all these losers to protest and tear the country apart. Sad. Very.
It was all fake...This, Antifa and the summer of love. I bet they are tied to the Palestine college campus protests.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yes I said they exposed the group. That's factually correct and not the same was "bringing it down"
I don't think the SPLC donors will consider this to be fraud. - SFP
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:33 pm to BugAC
quote:
don't think the SPLC donors will consider this to be fraud.
I don't think they will and that has nothing to do with the statement to which you replied
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
More fun with SFP:
quote:
No, but he gave them inside information for their reporting.
That's what snitches do.
Snitches require a quid pro quo. Looks like SPLC stopped at "something".
quote:
Snitches aren’t heads of organizations.
laughs in mob boss snitches
quote:
Isn't that the point of the SPLC? To expose racist groups?
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
Look at the ethnicity/religion of most SPLC leaders/attorneys. It's very telling and confirms a lot of "conspiracy" theories.
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So they paid him to snitch, then used the information he gave them to expose both him and his organization.
They are so good at identifying actual extremist groups that they have to pay the leader of the American National Socialist Party to snitch to the Southern Poverty Law Center to establish what? That he was a neo Nazi?
They needed to reward him $70,000 to hear it from him?
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No, but he gave them inside information for their reporting.
Dude, what reporting?
The entire "informant" narrative is dumb to begin with - what meaningful work product is SPLC producing that would either require or benefit from granular, inside information? They're not an intelligence agency or law enforcement group. They produce vague "reports" that are ripped to shreds by any sort of due diligence or oversight and rarely have any operational/creedal details.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
Post the list you lying sack of shite
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:44 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
They are so good at identifying actual extremist groups that they have to pay the leader of the American National Socialist Party to snitch to the Southern Poverty Law Center to establish what? That he was a neo Nazi?
Well, SFP's argument in the first 3 pages was that this was some grand orchestrated undercover scheme.
After many back and forths with people pointing out how stupid that sounds, his position is "we'll never know why they paid the KKK". He will NEVER question if SPLC was paying the klan because the existence of the klan justifies the existence of the southern poverty law center.
He won't question why from 2020 - 2024 the BIden admin listed "white nationalism" as the #1 threat to democracy, supported by documents written by SPLC, and the revelation today. Those 2 synapsis WILL NOT FIRE for SFP.
But he's going to try and gaslight the hell out of this board, that's for sure.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:46 pm to BugAC
quote:
Well, SFP's argument in the first 3 pages was that this was some grand orchestrated undercover scheme.
After many back and forths with people pointing out how stupid that sounds, his position is "we'll never know why they paid the KKK".
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:48 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Dude, what reporting?
He won’t answer this
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
If only your past posts did not exist....
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:50 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
They are so good at identifying actual extremist groups that they have to pay the leader of the American National Socialist Party to snitch to the Southern Poverty Law Center to establish what? That he was a neo Nazi?
Any group that is planning on going to a large public rally to preach their hate does not give a frick if the SPLC writes a frickin blog post about their group. They are already public with their hate in the first place.
SFPLC's "logic" completely falls apart. All the SPLC has done is paid large sums of money to already public racists. This money was then used to bring more and more people on board so the SPLC could make the problem appear worse than it already was. They used it as a marketing tool to solicit more donations to their organization. This is fraud. I suspect SFPLC already knows this, and has been said, he is literally paid to carry water for these people.
Yesterday he was on record predicting they will only be found guilty of one misdemeanor charge.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:51 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Dude, what reporting?
The entire "informant" narrative is dumb to begin with - what meaningful work product is SPLC producing that would either require or benefit from granular, inside information? They're not an intelligence agency or law enforcement group. They produce vague "reports" that are ripped to shreds by any sort of due diligence or oversight and rarely have any operational/creedal details.
I've tried to limit speculation to avoid digressions, but I'll engage shortly here. I'd imagine the identification of the networks and people involved was one of the primary goals and not all of this was publicly reported.
But, let me pose this in response. If this wasn't about information-gathering, what was the point of stealing the 25 boxes of paperwork? What other purpose would that serve? And that incident is specifically alleged in the indictment.
Page 7 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News