- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The SPLC paid $70,000 to the leader of the American Nazi Party, then listed him as
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
You've posted absolutely nothing that proves any of these "informants" provided any information that lead to any type of action by the SPLC or law enforcement whatsoever. At least 10 years and 3MM dollars. What have they yielded in their fight to bring down Nazis for this investment? Nothing.
So what were they paying for? Why pay the leaders to tell on themselves? The FBI team investigating already told you what they were paying for, but unlike your dalliances with Jack Smith and Fanni Willis, you refuse to believe it. Its as simple as this.
So what were they paying for? Why pay the leaders to tell on themselves? The FBI team investigating already told you what they were paying for, but unlike your dalliances with Jack Smith and Fanni Willis, you refuse to believe it. Its as simple as this.
0
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:03 pm to BugAC
quote:
Have their been that many mob bosses that snitches? I'm talking heads of families. THE BOSS. Most of the snitching comes from underlings. I only recall hearing of 1 actual boss that turned and it wasn't an NY family. I think it was somewhere in the midwest.
Well this guy wasn't even the boss of that Aryan Nations faction when he was snitching for the SPLC, just FWIW
quote:
In August 2010, Aryan Nations veteran and Christian Identity pastor Morris Gulett joined Mullet’s group after serving a five-year prison sentence for plotting an armed bank robbery. Gulett had authenticity as an Aryan Nations leader: He had worked with Richard Butler and claimed that Butler had ordained him as a Christian Identity pastor. That summer, Mullet moved his Aryan Nations headquarters to Chillicothe, Ohio.
In October 2010, Gulett forced Mullet out of the group, taking control of the Aryan Nations faction.
That's from the SPLC article. It says he took a few "stragglers" and formed a splinter of the splinter, but it doesn't seem to have materialized into anything thereafter.
The indictment alleges they paid him 2014-2016. So he wasn't a leader of any group by that point, per the article at least.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:04 pm to Dee_oh_Dee
quote:
Posting nonstop all while claiming to be in court.
I was in court earlier today
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:04 pm to Dee_oh_Dee
quote:
He had over 300 posts on this topic 50 more elsewhere yesterday between 6am and 8pm. Looks like a work day to me. Posting nonstop all while claiming to be in court.
This one hit close to home for him.
My thoughts too.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
The list, my good sir. What has the SPLC done that you didn't like?
Or are you just full of shite?
Or are you just full of shite?
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:06 pm to Azkiger
quote:
My thoughts too.
The dishonesty/spin from this story is off the charts, which provided a lot to respond to. That's the explanation for the volume.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Well this guy wasn't even the boss of that Aryan Nations faction when he was snitching for the SPLC, just FWIW
How do you know he was "snitching"? I haven't found any of this information. SPLC was paying him, but you make it sound like Gullett was trying to bring the organization down. There is no proof of any of that from what i've seen, admtitedly i haven't looked at this in depth.
If you want to make that assumption, fine. My assumption is that Gullett was being paid by SPLC, but not to destroy the organization. SPLC seems more likely to be a partner with this KKK group.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:07 pm to BugAC
quote:
How do you know he was "snitching"?
I'm going off the indictment
quote:
but you make it sound like Gullett was trying to bring the organization down.
I never said that.
The only way you can spin that they weren't providing information is to create an entirely new definition of "informant"
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I was in court earlier today
Doing what?
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:09 pm to BugAC
quote:
Doing what?
Representing a client.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm going off the indictment
So exactly what i was saying. Awesome.
quote:
I never said that.
You were implying it, dear. You were trying to provide cover for SPLC. Otherwise, your entire posts on the first page make no sense.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Representing a client.
I thought you were a constitutional lawyer?
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Are paid informants a legitimate function of ANY non-LEO bodies?
So they paid him to snitch
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
Post why you don't like the SPLC please. This shouldn't be hard.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:12 pm to BugAC
quote:
You were implying it, dear. Y
No. I specifically said multiple times it was used for content by the SPLC and there is a question what information made it to LEO.
quote:
. Otherwise, your entire posts on the first page make no sense.
My posts on page 1:
First post:
quote:
So they paid him to snitch, then used the information he gave them to expose both him and his organization.
I said expose, which is nothing close to "bring the organization down."
quote:
No, but he gave them inside information for their reporting.
That's what snitches do.
Specific reference to content only
Another post I link the content.
Another post I respond to an unsupported, likely dishonest allegation asking for their support/basis.
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Assumption after assumption after assumption.
If the donors are fine with this behavior
You assume the money being transferred is for "snitching."
You assume the money involved never supported nefarious behavior.
You assume supervised/directed bigoted activity was actually neither supervised or directed
You assume a circumstance could exist where all SPLC donors would be fine with laundering their donations, then channelling those laundered funds to nasty bigots.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:16 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Assumption after assumption after assumption.
You assume the money being transferred is for "snitching."
You assume the money involved never supported nefarious behavior.
You assume supervised/directed bigoted activity was actually neither supervised or directed
You assume a circumstance could exist where all SPLC donors would be fine with laundering their donations, then channelling those laundered funds to nasty bigots.
If the government had this evidence, you have to wonder why it wasn't included in the indictment.
Again, I'm going off their work.
The question about the donors is specifically tied to the allegation of fraud. The government is alleging fraud that may blow up if the donors can be shown to approve of this. How can they be defrauded with behavior they approve of?
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:18 pm to NC_Tigah
Dude has 117 posts since 7:30 last night. SlowSPLCPro putting in the effort! 
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
new definition of "informant"
Why does a non-governmental agency need informants? Were the splc financiers aware the organization was running law enforcement type operations like this?
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:19 pm to texag7
quote:
He’s working overtime on this topic. You have to wonder if he’s being paid
It seems obvious that he is. For two days straight now this guy has hounded this topic relentlessly. I made a thread that he pretty much single handedly drove to over 25 pages in length carrying water for these people who are paying white supremacists large sums of money to plan hate rallies. No rational person would be this invested in such a topic.
Page 6 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News