- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The SPLC paid $70,000 to the leader of the American Nazi Party, then listed him as
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:50 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Isn't that the point of the SPLC? To expose racist groups?
This would be like me paying 70k to expose that Michael Jordan plays basketball.
2
Posted on 4/24/26 at 7:52 am to geauxturbo
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 4/24/26 at 7:53 am
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:34 am to Hondo Blacksheep
quote:
I read the original blog comment that everyone is now citing saying snitches aren't heads of organizations, but is that really true? Depending on my parachute I might do that rather than face major time or life in prison.
Snitches can be the heads of the organization. But that is in the case that the organization is large and has a large reach.
It wouldn’t be rational to pay a two-man street gang leader for information on his street gang. You’d just be enabling that small street gang.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:39 am to the808bass
I been saying for years, the kkk is no where to be found in the south, yet the SPLC always seems to locate a nest. Turns out, SPLC was feathering the nest.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:43 am to geauxturbo
The SPLC is one of the most racist groups in America. That entire organization is chock full of people who loathe whites
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:45 am to L.A.
And absolutely NONE of this would have ever come to light under a Democrat administration
Guaranteed.
Guaranteed.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 7:13 am to SlowFlowPro
So now that we know that the female at the SPLC was being banged by the head Nazi and that the money was being partially used to fund the growth of the Nazis and partially used to create their love nest where he would meet up and bang her
Do you want to revise your previous unwavering position?
That it was strictly used to pay snitches for information? To further the fight against Nazis?
Do you want to revise your previous unwavering position?
That it was strictly used to pay snitches for information? To further the fight against Nazis?
Posted on 6/17/26 at 8:10 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
And absolutely NONE of this would have ever come to light under a Democrat administration
Guaranteed.
Because they think like SFP. It's okay to pay people to do racist things to uncover racism.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 8:16 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Isn't that the point of the SPLC? To expose racist groups?
Only after funding them.
Step 1 - create a problem
Step 2 - get money to solve the problem
Step 3 - make the problem bigger
Step 4 - ask for more money
Repeat steps 3 and 4 forever.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 8:18 am to SlowFlowPro
They paid him to snitch on himself!
-SFPLC
-SFPLC
Posted on 6/17/26 at 8:21 am to jimmy the leg
Yeah, the evidence is overwhelming. Not only does the indictment claim that the SPLC encouraged these groups to protest and rabble rouse, they funded these actions. They also outlined the explosion in fundraising that spun off from these protests.
Its a money racket.... and probably the most shameful one I've ever seen.
Its a money racket.... and probably the most shameful one I've ever seen.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 8:28 am to L.A.
I haven't read the entire thread but do we know the names of any of these people yet? It would be interesting to find out which of the "alt right" podcasts that popped up in 2016-2017 were actually funded by the splc.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 8:47 am to L.A.
SPLC couldn't find enough Nazis and Klan, so they hired their own for public display.
The SPLC commies are to the Nazis as two horns are on the same goat.
The SPLC commies are to the Nazis as two horns are on the same goat.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 8:49 am to Old Sarge
quote:
Do you want to revise your previous unwavering position?
No I'll still rely on the words of the indictment itself.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 9:05 am to SlowFlowPro
Well, the indictment is for lying about where the money is going, right, and spending it on things other than what they said they were
I’m not sure they can prosecute her for having a love affair with the head Nazi is a prosecutable crime, but it doesn’t make it not true
But her banging the guy and a portion of the money, a pretty good chunk going towards their love affair really discredits your statements about the money was strictly used to pay for insider information
Clearly, you were wrong and clearly you can’t not admit that I guess
I’m not sure they can prosecute her for having a love affair with the head Nazi is a prosecutable crime, but it doesn’t make it not true
But her banging the guy and a portion of the money, a pretty good chunk going towards their love affair really discredits your statements about the money was strictly used to pay for insider information
Clearly, you were wrong and clearly you can’t not admit that I guess
Posted on 6/17/26 at 9:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:honest question:
No I'll still rely on the words of the indictment itself.
do you think these organizations in which key individuals were provided funding by the SPLC were ultimately harmed by those contributions? or do you think that they were able to extend their operations as a result of the influx of cash?
i honestly don’t know - but it seems to me that the SPLC had a significant ROI from their “snitches”, just wondering if the inside info they provided actually helped shut them down, or keep them going
Posted on 6/17/26 at 9:10 am to FearlessFreep
quote:
do you think these organizations in which key individuals were provided funding by the SPLC were ultimately harmed by those contributions? or do you think that they were able to extend their operations as a result of the influx of cash?
That is a valid question and the indictment does not really get into it.
There is a lot of conflation going on about who received the money and where that money went, in outlets favorable to the admin, as well as what the money was specifically used for.
I would imagine, and this is speculation admitted fully, if the government had more nefarious details, they would have included them in the actual allegations of the indictment, instead of relying on the dishonest content creators to spin the actual language. We'll likely have to wait for pretrial motions and maybe even the trial to get answers.
For an example, look at the indictment language for the bank fraud crimes, which is much more specific and detailed (and, as I have said, are much stronger claims).
The other issue is going to be the "Fraud" part. If the SPLC presents donors who are fine with this behavior and testify this behavior was expected, it's going to be hard to say those investors were defrauded. This will likely require a trial to determine.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 9:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's what snitches do.
Well guess what?The leaders of a nazi party do with an extra seventy thousand dollars
Idiot
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:04 am to ChatGPT of LA
they paid them to stoke racial problems not just for info
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:10 am to the808bass
quote:Then wtf is Slow talking about?
It’s more like paying the owner of a small, failing sandwich shop to keep the shop open while reporting that the shop is a health hazard and then soliciting donations to fight unsafe restaurants.
What did they expose with the $70k?
Page 11 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News