- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The SPLC paid $70,000 to the leader of the American Nazi Party, then listed him as
Posted on 4/23/26 at 2:06 pm to the808bass
Posted on 4/23/26 at 2:06 pm to the808bass
It's all about money. Pay certain members of groups to stoke the fires. Use those fires to help bring donations into your organization. Profit. SFP just likes to argue about nonsense. Anybody with a brain can see what this is.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 2:09 pm to L.A.
This was probably not a snitch or undercover informant operation. Most likely a moth trap. You find someone with connections to KKK or aryan brotherhood, who can set up a community. You anonymously back him with enough money to purchase the tech and infrastructure to start a group, usually on a TOR network. This way you can discover new bad actors or ones that you have been looking for. This has FBI or NSA fingerprints all over it. These operations can be dubious at best. These new "groups" of interest can provide some legit info but can also be a great way to shakedown and generate federal funds. It's basically the "chicken or the egg" problem. Did you discover new bad actors (SPLC argument) or did you produce the bad actors and give them the means to carry out an operation (which happens all the time).
Posted on 4/23/26 at 2:11 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Rush Limbaugh said this all the time. The Race grievance industry must justify its existence or else the money dries up.
He said the same thing about Human Rights Campaign. Once gay marriage was passed, the organization needed something else to hitch their wagon too to justify their existence. They immediately pivoted to the trans movement. That’s why the trans movement ramped up once gay marriage was passed. It’s all about the money
Posted on 4/23/26 at 2:12 pm to Tiger Prawn
quote:
What info did SPLC supposedly expose about the guy that they had to pay him $70K for the info? All SPLC did was take a bunch of things the guy said in various public forums or settings and compile it into one place. Still not seeing a reasonable justification for them paying him when they seemingly could have gotten the info for free.
Still no inkling of what sort of stuff was in the 25 (edited to correct from 40 - my bad) boxes that one guy was supposedly paid $1 million to “steal,” copy, and return.
Who the hell ever thought Aryan hate groups were generating and archivally retaining reams of inter-office correspondence?
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 4/23/26 at 2:34 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Always defending the left
He's a LWNJ lemming that calls everyone else a NPC....
Posted on 4/23/26 at 2:36 pm to Azkiger
quote:
You gotta wonder if he's really paid by the post.
I'll fully admit I do go into leftist spaces to do a bit of trolling/fact checking, but maybe a dozen posts a month.
This guy hangs around a board that actively hates him, often to the tune of hundreds of posts a day, all while claiming he's some super busy lawyer.
If I billed lawyer rates for my time, I wouldn't be posting hundreds of posts a day. My time would be too valuable to waste on the unwashed idiotic masses.
Now, if I were a 90 IQ idiot who constantly gets owned, I might supplement my closer to minimum wage level income with being a punching bag on a popular political forum.
I know more about this than I should, but his persona is like a movie that asks me to suspend belief in reality too many times.
It's stupid, but I have the receipts. Yesterday he took a 15 minute break once an hour. He is rapid fire otherwise. Twenty four times he posted twice in the same minute. There is no way he left his house. It's all there if you are bored.
He would be more believable if he just switched his screen name to one of his alts?
Sfplc should have spread these posts out with the one he pretends to be a woman. Man that one disappeared. 4cubbies rip.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 2:37 pm to redfishfan
quote:
Use those fires to help bring donations into your organization.
SPLC's income and asset value more than doubled in the year after Charlottesville.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 2:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So they paid him to snitch
Incorrect.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 2:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
They made MILLIONS on their "snitch" investment. This line of bs isn't going to work. Even your DU posse will have to admit this is damning.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 2:43 pm to L.A.
Jesse Waters had a great analogy last night. That dumb bitch Jessica Tarloff was defending the SPLC saying, “This is no different than the FBI paying informants for information.”
Jesse says, “No Jessica! The FBI is a law enforcement agency. The SPLC situation is like Save The Whales paying whaling ships to go out and kill whales so they can point to it and say “They’re killing the whales!” so they can fundraise off of it.”
Jesse says, “No Jessica! The FBI is a law enforcement agency. The SPLC situation is like Save The Whales paying whaling ships to go out and kill whales so they can point to it and say “They’re killing the whales!” so they can fundraise off of it.”
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 4/23/26 at 2:46 pm to Fuzzy Dunlop
Why do you think its a joke of a case?
Absent a superseding indictment that gets into the nature of what the recipients of the payments used them for, the allegations in the indictment are very cut and dry wire fraud/false statements to banks type of allegations.
Absent a superseding indictment that gets into the nature of what the recipients of the payments used them for, the allegations in the indictment are very cut and dry wire fraud/false statements to banks type of allegations.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 3:00 pm to L.A.
What's really intriguing to me is if you look at the history of the KKK. Whom was it founded by?
Find your answer and think backwards and then forward.
Find your answer and think backwards and then forward.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 3:00 pm to Dee_oh_Dee
quote:
He would be more believable if he just switched his screen name to one of his alts?
Sfplc should have spread these posts out with the one he pretends to be a woman
What in the...frick
Posted on 4/23/26 at 3:01 pm to SHPMustang
quote:
the allegations in the indictment are very cut and dry wire fraud
That's the weak part (based on what has been filed so far)
quote:
false statements to banks
That's the strong part
Posted on 4/23/26 at 3:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
They won't consider it to be fraud because they are as retarded as you are.
Jesus H Christ
Jesus H Christ
Posted on 4/23/26 at 10:14 pm to the808bass
I'm not so sure. I read the original blog comment that everyone is now citing saying snitches aren't heads of organizations, but is that really true? Depending on my parachute I might do that rather than face major time or life in prison.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 10:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Isn't that the point of the SPLC? To expose racist groups?
Do you actually believe the point of this leftist organization is to “expose racist groups”?
Posted on 4/24/26 at 4:33 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Do you actually believe the point of this leftist organization is to “expose racist groups”?
What he is was just explained a few posts up.
What he posts has nothing to do with what he believes.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:05 am to thebigmuffaletta
He knows they are guilty AF. He supports them so he argues fringe points to derail and deflect. He's done it almost HALF A MILLION times on here 
This post was edited on 4/24/26 at 6:06 am
Popular
Back to top


1








