- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/8/26 at 1:38 pm to mwade91383
quote:
You’re projecting a lot of my opinions about Ashley Babbitt (that you’ve never heard and don’t even know if they exist) onto me. Seems kinda lazy.
Like using pure emotion and a goldfish memory to argue points? That lazy?
Posted on 1/8/26 at 1:47 pm to Floyd Dawg
He received 37 stitches as a result of the aforementioned incident
well yeah but, I mean do we really know what direction the legal observers tires were pointed on their 3000 lb vehicle when they "made contact" with that agent resulting in 37 stitches?
I mean there's not actually video of that incident showing contact being made resulting in 37 stitches that I can look at and try to parse words to make it seem like contact wasn't made.
Cmon man this is malarkey. What's a few stitches when I've been waiting MONTHS while having to dangle the Epstein files over and over in preparation for this agent attacking and murdering an innocent Minnesota mom on her way to get groceries who was just directing traffic while being parallel to the road.
Now i got a juicy dead victim (that I don't care about) to parade around to make my political hay with and you're trying to bring 37 stitches into it. Bogus man!!
We got em now tho so all good.
well yeah but, I mean do we really know what direction the legal observers tires were pointed on their 3000 lb vehicle when they "made contact" with that agent resulting in 37 stitches?
I mean there's not actually video of that incident showing contact being made resulting in 37 stitches that I can look at and try to parse words to make it seem like contact wasn't made.
Cmon man this is malarkey. What's a few stitches when I've been waiting MONTHS while having to dangle the Epstein files over and over in preparation for this agent attacking and murdering an innocent Minnesota mom on her way to get groceries who was just directing traffic while being parallel to the road.
Now i got a juicy dead victim (that I don't care about) to parade around to make my political hay with and you're trying to bring 37 stitches into it. Bogus man!!
We got em now tho so all good.
This post was edited on 1/8/26 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 1/8/26 at 1:51 pm to mwade91383
quote:
Which shot? Just the 1st, right? Certainly not the 2nd or 3rd.
You must only be talking about the 1st shot when he put down his camera. Can we see that footage at some point BTW?
If there is case law that says differently I am happy to read it, but to my knowledge, once deadly force is justified the officer can use that force until the threat is neutralized. If he fired 1 shot or mag dumped, it doesn't change as long as the initial was justified and the threat was still present.
To argue that the less than 2 seconds between first and third shots that the threat was fully neutralized at a discernable level is totally asinine.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 1:51 pm to FAT SEXY
quote:
The right dying on this ICE agent hill is reminiscent of the Chauvin incident
Sounds like a leftist theory.
Leftists would love for the right to not be willing to die on any hill. Makes their soft coup of America much easier.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 1:53 pm to FAT SEXY
A showdown was inevitable on the deportation issue. Either ‘Sanctuary Cities’ have the Right to reject and nullify Federal enforcement of deportation via violent confrontation or they don’t. Trump/MAGA knows that if the tens of millions of subsidized immigrants stay then their votes will “fundamentally change “ America. It’s either/or and both sides know it. There is no way that a handful of politically biased people wearing Black Robes will determine such a monumental issue. It’s delusional to think such. It always comes down to brute force.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 1:55 pm to lionward2014
quote:
If there is case law that says differently I am happy to read it, but to my knowledge, once deadly force is justified the officer can use that force until the threat is neutralized.
That is correct. We can leave it to the emotional group to attempt prove otherwise.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 1:56 pm to lionward2014
If there is case law
Case law?? we don't need no stinking case law!!!! We got an agenda to push here. the 2nd and 3rd shots are part of the agenda man!!!!! or at least they are now that I've thrown them on my unending pile of BS in an attempt to enflame the situation.
Case law?? we don't need no stinking case law!!!! We got an agenda to push here. the 2nd and 3rd shots are part of the agenda man!!!!! or at least they are now that I've thrown them on my unending pile of BS in an attempt to enflame the situation.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 1:59 pm to FAT SEXY
Your June 2020 joking date seems quite coincidental.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 2:07 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
That is correct. We can leave it to the emotional group to attempt prove otherwise.
We should require gun safety classes in all public schools. I truly believe the Left has such a hard time with details in these situations (the arguing shooting 3 rounds is "excessive," not whether the initial shot was justified or not) because they have no knowledge of firearms.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 2:16 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:Yeah, that or pledge their allegiance to the cult.
Man, you've come to the wrong place.
Amen. It's stupid of me to be concerned about that. People are here mostly to blow off steam.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 2:30 pm to mwade91383
quote:
Which shot? Just the 1st, right? Certainly not the 2nd or 3rd.
If the first was justified, they all were.
The tard expecting a human brain to differentiate between the shots while defending themselves needs to just be laughed at.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 2:39 pm to jammajin
quote:
Case law?? we don't need no stinking case law!!!! We got an agenda to push here. the 2nd and 3rd shots are part of the agenda man!!!!! or at least they are now that I've thrown them on my unending pile of BS in an attempt to enflame the situation.
I can see that you're being sarcastic here, but let's be real. Is it really too much to ask that the officers pause for a few hundred milliseconds between each shot and perform a damage assessment to determine whether further shots are necessary?
Posted on 1/8/26 at 2:41 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
The tard expecting a human brain to differentiate between the shots while defending themselves needs to just be laughed at.
Come on man, what would it take to determine if additional shots were necessary? A quarter second? Is that really too much to ask?
Posted on 1/8/26 at 2:50 pm to Floyd Dawg
Certainly explains his itchy trigger finger if that’s what you mean. Doesn’t explain him being a dumbass and putting himself in front of the car (which he’s trained not to do).
You’d think of all ppl he’d know that by now….
You’d think of all ppl he’d know that by now….
Posted on 1/8/26 at 2:54 pm to FluffyBunnyFeet
quote:
I can see that you're being sarcastic here, but let's be real. Is it really too much to ask that the officers pause for a few hundred milliseconds between each shot and perform a damage assessment to determine whether further shots are necessary?
Or.. even easier. Don't put yourself in a position for a federal agent to have complete legal cover to shoot you while retaining qualified immunity.
I think that would be the easier one.
The huge elephant in the room is that people have escaped consequences for their actions for so long that they now believe actual physical confrontations with law enforcement is "their right". Uhh. No its not.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 2:56 pm to lionward2014
I’m sorry do cars drive sideways where you live?
The 2nd & 3rd shots went through the driver side door/window. There was no threat at that point to him or any officer (not that he even looked, he was staring at his phone)
The 2nd & 3rd shots went through the driver side door/window. There was no threat at that point to him or any officer (not that he even looked, he was staring at his phone)
Posted on 1/8/26 at 3:12 pm to mwade91383
quote:
I’m sorry do cars drive sideways where you live?
When it freezes the tires spin when you mash the accelerator.
quote:
The 2nd & 3rd shots went through the driver side door/window. There was no threat at that point to him or any officer (not that he even looked, he was staring at his phone)
Did you notice that the car sped off and crashed?
Posted on 1/8/26 at 3:14 pm to FluffyBunnyFeet
quote:
Is it really too much to ask that the officers pause for a few hundred milliseconds between each shot and perform a damage assessment to determine whether further shots are necessary?
Mainly because it’s impossible to pause a hundred milliseconds and assess anything.
Try pressing a button twice.
Now try to press a button twice while assessing anything between the presses of the button.
Retard.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 3:16 pm to OceanMan
If you’re pointing a gun at the driver door of a car, how does frozen temps and spinning tires make the car come at you?
Page 18 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News