- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The only proof anyone needs re: election fraud is that nobody can prove there wasn’t any.
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:04 pm
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:04 pm
And “we the people” are denied standing to ask even a single question about it. Others are indicted on trumped up charges.
Actions speak louder than words. Particularly words like:
“81 million”
“Most secure election in history!”
“Not widespread”
and
“It’s time to move on”
fricking no it’s not.
Actions speak louder than words. Particularly words like:
“81 million”
“Most secure election in history!”
“Not widespread”
and
“It’s time to move on”
fricking no it’s not.
31
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:08 pm to ezride25
The MSM was all about 2016 being illegitimate, though. Couldn't go a day without hearing them cry about it for over half a presidential term.
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:09 pm to ezride25
You forgot "debunked" and "no standing" in the gaslight spectrum.
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:14 pm to ezride25
quote:
nobody can prove there wasn’t any
Not like we need to prove a negative when you can't even begin to prove the positive.
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:14 pm to ezride25
Elections without transparency deserve the full presumption of fraud.
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:17 pm to ezride25
Imagine believing Joe Biden got 81M legitimate votes
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:19 pm to ezride25
quote:
The only proof anyone needs re: election fraud is that nobody can prove there wasn’t any.
We've got some world-class philosophers on this forum!
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:21 pm to ItNeverRains
you would have to be a complete moron to think that Biden got 81 million votes. that's saying that he got more votes than the great Obama!
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:27 pm to Stealth Matrix
quote:
The MSM was all about 2016 being illegitimate, though. Couldn't go a day without hearing them cry about it for over half a presidential term.
Bush/Gore in 2000 was just as bad. The Dems and MSM were looking for votes and scrutinizing hanging chads in Florida for months after the election.
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:28 pm to ezride25
So you’re expecting somebody to come in and prove the negative. The problem is it wouldn’t matter if the negative could be proven. Every time one of the election fraud narratives has been shown to be incorrect those that believe the election was stolen just move to a new narrative. It happened with “the ballots are coming in from Asia “, “the Italian military was involved in fraud “, “the Dominion machines were changing votes”, “election workers were changing votes”, “sharpie markers canceled Trump votes”, “mules, mules, mules”, “suitcases and trash bags full of ballots”, “dead people voting multiple times”, etc., etc., etc.
Nobody can prove to you that something didn’t happen, especially when you refuse to consider their illustrations of your conspiracy theory’s inaccuracies, and constantly jump from one claim to another.
Nobody can prove to you that something didn’t happen, especially when you refuse to consider their illustrations of your conspiracy theory’s inaccuracies, and constantly jump from one claim to another.
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:32 pm to countrytiger60
quote:
you would have to be a complete moron to think that Biden got 81 million votes. that's saying that he got more votes than the great Obama!
I believe he got 81M votes. I do not believe he got 81M legitimate votes.
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:32 pm to lowhound
quote:
Bush/Gore in 2000 was just as bad. The Dems and MSM were looking for votes and scrutinizing hanging chads in Florida for months after the election.
Scrutinizing the results of an election is not the same thing as conspiring to place false electors, pressuring election officials to “find” votes, leaning on the Vice President to go against his constitutional duty, and fomenting public uprisings because one man can’t accept that he lost an election.
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:39 pm to ezride25
In addition, and using your own flawed logic, you should prove that Biden didn’t get 81 million votes. You should prove that it wasn’t a secure election. I’m sure there are a plethora of negatives that you could be asked to “prove”. Nobody is asking that, because that type of logic is not sound.
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:41 pm to HVAU
I imagine there will be plenty more exposing the rampant fraud.
It is mounting approaching 2024.
Georgia and Michigan are getting this scrutiny.
Plenty was uncovered in 2021 - more to follow, thankfully
It is mounting approaching 2024.
Georgia and Michigan are getting this scrutiny.
Plenty was uncovered in 2021 - more to follow, thankfully
This post was edited on 8/18/23 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:43 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
I imagine there will be plenty more exposing the rampant fraud. It is mounting approaching 2024.
Sure, sure. You go ahead and get started with that.
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:44 pm to ezride25
quote:
The only proof anyone needs re: election fraud is that nobody can prove there wasn’t any
I am assuming that this was intended as satire?
Posted on 8/18/23 at 4:00 pm to ezride25
OH I see, chicken or egg question.
Posted on 8/18/23 at 4:10 pm to ezride25
I like where you're at but it is impossible to prove the absence of something.
Posted on 8/18/23 at 4:12 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Not like we need to prove a negative when you can't even begin to prove the positive.
1- Should we have put McVey on trial?? == Nobody had proved he had anything to do with the bombing until they actually had a trial? WHY would they have held a trial when the allegations had not be PROVEN???? =
2 - the rap on "fraud" is not that there was NO fraud - it was that "nothing has been proved that would change outcome!! == SO - there can be NO investigation into any allegations until it has been PROVEN to not only have 'happened' - but that it would have 'overturned the outcome"
3 - so along comes Trump and says something like "Georgia has Biden 11.870 votes more than Trump - and there is evidence that over 30,000 votes were counted incorrectly - so all you have to do is look at those ballots to see if the result would be changed. And all you need is to find an additional 11,871 votes for me.' =====> and that caused Trump to be charged with 30 felonies and going on trial --- for 'conspiracy to commit fraud'
btw - when is the trial for HRC due? - or for Stacy Adams? - or for Al Gore??
Posted on 8/18/23 at 4:14 pm to ezride25
When the various groups and people who challenged the election in 2020 in several key swing states were denied access to ballots, machines and video surveillance you knew the people overseeing the election didn’t want any prying eyes.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News