- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 8/3/22 at 11:14 am to GeorgeWest
quote:
Kansas has CLOSED party primaries. Unaffiliated voters cannot vote in party primaries but can vote for ballot initiatives. This explains the vote totals.
The examples of people claiming fraud instead of just saying i don't understand how voting actually works continue i see......
Posted on 8/3/22 at 11:15 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I skimmed, but did not really "analyze," the document. My VERY quick review seems to indicate that Dr. Neuhaus was referring patients to Dr. Tiller for abortions under the "post 22-week exceptions," but that she was not adequately confirming and/or documenting the applicability of those exceptions.
Correct. And when you get into the weeds a little bit, some of her evals were dated after the abortion procedures.
Posted on 8/3/22 at 11:17 am to GeorgeWest
quote:
Unaffiliated voters cannot vote in party primaries
Any unaffiliated voter can declare their party affiliation on the day of the election and receive a party ballot. Otherwise you are correct.
Posted on 8/3/22 at 11:19 am to CamdenTiger
quote:
Something is up in Kansas, but the wording of that issue was terrible. They used wording to confuse the issue. It’s what the Dems do, like spending s bunch of you money and call it an inflation reduction bill, or planned parenthood, when it’s killing your family off…
The wording of the ballot measure was hyper confusing. If you read the measure, the wording seems to mean the exact opposite of the actual effect. Only people who were actively involved and educated on the pro-life side understood the measure. The ballot measure was an intentionally confusing circuitous legal-word salad
This post was edited on 8/3/22 at 11:25 am
Posted on 8/3/22 at 11:27 am to Jake88
quote:
Someone posted the wording last night. It was a mess.
These amendment questions are always written confusing as fk. This is not a sim it's tested in think tanks. They know half the folks don't research and just read the confusing shite and pick the wrong response.
Posted on 8/3/22 at 11:27 am to ShinerHorns
“We either win or someone cheated!”
Congrats, you’ve all turned into teenage Bama fans. Turn in your man cards appropriately.
Congrats, you’ve all turned into teenage Bama fans. Turn in your man cards appropriately.
Posted on 8/3/22 at 12:06 pm to ShinerHorns
Muh Dominion!!!!!!
Posted on 8/3/22 at 12:09 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Congrats, you’ve all turned into teenage Bama fans. Turn in your man cards appropriately.
RA'd to request we change the name to the Political Rant to align with the other boards where people win or cry about cheating.
Posted on 8/3/22 at 12:18 pm to ShinerHorns
I figured something was up.
Posted on 8/3/22 at 12:26 pm to bizeagle
quote:If one starts with an understanding that the Kansas Supreme Court has already ruled that the state constitution guarantees a (limited) right to abortion, the ballot language was not even remotely confusing.
Something is up in Kansas, but the wording of that issue was terrible. They used wording to confuse the issue. It’s what the Dems do, like spending s bunch of you money and call it an inflation reduction bill, or planned parenthood, when it’s killing your family off…quote:
The wording of the ballot measure was hyper confusing. If you read the measure, the wording seems to mean the exact opposite of the actual effect. Only people who were actively involved and educated on the pro-life side understood the measure. The ballot measure was an intentionally confusing circuitous legal-word salad
Lacking that knowledge, the language would probably have seemed baffling.
That is probably part of the problem with the ballot language in this case (and many, many others). The people who write it ARE familiar with the issues, and it never occurs to them that they should test the language upon others.
This post was edited on 8/3/22 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 8/3/22 at 12:38 pm to notsince98
quote:
They did not ask me what ballot I wanted when i went to vote. They just handed me an R ballot.
It's your hair cut and lack of nose ring.
Posted on 8/3/22 at 12:52 pm to LakeCharles
quote:
It's your hair cut and lack of nose ring.
You probably nailed it.
Posted on 8/3/22 at 11:44 pm to TGFN57
quote:Shhhh don't tell the 0bama voters, the Bernie bros, or the Beta voters.
Sometimes people just think voting for a principle is more important than voting for politicians.
Posted on 8/4/22 at 2:38 am to ShinerHorns
The undeclared voters only had the question. Yes, lots more undeclared now days.
Posted on 8/4/22 at 10:24 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Your inability to admit that the measure was worded poorly
that explains it only if you believe that non stop advertising did not explain how to vote for the result desired.
rewrite and please please
try again in 2024.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News