- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The dems (Dick Durban) are now on the record defending light sentences for pedophiles.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 3:00 pm to Kinetic_Response
Posted on 3/22/22 at 3:00 pm to Kinetic_Response
quote:
Kinetic_Response
Welcome back, Hank.
2
Posted on 3/22/22 at 3:02 pm to Rebel
Posted on 3/22/22 at 3:02 pm to NineLineBind
quote:
Welcome back, Hank.
Just can’t help himself.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 3:03 pm to Spawn
quote:I do not know exactly what images he is accused of sharing or whether he actually did so. But my analysis applies to him in exactly the same way that it would apply to anyone else. If he was sharing images of near-adults, I see it as less-serious than the abuse of small children.
So how much time should Hunter Biden get for sharing videos of under age women on Pronhub ?
Absolutists seem to see the matter differently. "Sin is sin." I'm not hurling perjoratives at them from seeing the matter that way. I just disagree.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 3:05 pm to Kinetic_Response
quote:
Isn't it?
no
quote:
That exchange before the Sentencing Commission related to possession offenders who are not "pedophiles," which is defined as persons sexually-attracted to pre-pubescent children. And she is being criticized for suggesting that lighter sentences for those offenders (versus abusers of pre-pubescent children) might be appropriate.
She isn't arguing that. She is arguing it was someone more interested in the "technology" vs the images themselves.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 3:07 pm to NineLineBind
quote:
Welcome back, Hank.
that explains it.
good ol Pedo Hank.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 3:08 pm to Rebel
quote:My vote is pedo HHTM
good ol Pedo Hank.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 3:09 pm to Rebel
quote:
the scenarios you are describing are not the scenarios KJB is being asked about.
This
This post was edited on 3/22/22 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 3/22/22 at 3:10 pm to Rebel
I think you are conflating two distinct issues.
The Commission exchange related to "possession offenders who not pedophiles." That category would include the (odd) "technology" collector that is discussed in the excerpts that I have seen, who is not motivated "at all" by sexual gratification. It would also include possession offenders who collect images of older minors, even if collected for sexual gratification (the 17yo example).
The broader sentencing discussion (and her tendency to impose sentences on the low end of the spectrum in many cases) is distinct in many ways from the narrow topic discussed at that 2003 hearing.
The Commission exchange related to "possession offenders who not pedophiles." That category would include the (odd) "technology" collector that is discussed in the excerpts that I have seen, who is not motivated "at all" by sexual gratification. It would also include possession offenders who collect images of older minors, even if collected for sexual gratification (the 17yo example).
The broader sentencing discussion (and her tendency to impose sentences on the low end of the spectrum in many cases) is distinct in many ways from the narrow topic discussed at that 2003 hearing.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 4:05 pm to Kinetic_Response
quote:
Kinetic_Response
Has child pron on his computer.
Or got 5 years for it.
His entire existence here on PT has been arguing against child pron sentencing guidelines.
This post was edited on 3/22/22 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 3/22/22 at 4:11 pm to Rebel
quote:
The dems (Dick Durban) are now on the record defending light sentences for pedophiles.
Where do you even start with this? Durbin is a huge piece of sh!t. He's an old skool democrat that still thinks he can talk down to blacks, women, and union workers and that they will shower him with love and votes. He is probably not sleeping at night because he's borderline irrelevant. He's only safe in his job because Illinois is a machine state and he's paying off the right person. Even that is tenuous as Madigan was the man behind the curtain and he's fooked.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 4:18 pm to tadman
It’s funny how libs want to be nuanced on this issue, but then claim Florida passed a “don’t say gay” law
Posted on 3/22/22 at 5:54 pm to Kinetic_Response
quote:So in your mind... what is the number of kiddie porn images acceptable to mail to your friends?
If you email even one porn image of a minor to a friend
Posted on 3/22/22 at 6:03 pm to Kinetic_Response
quote:
If you email even one porn image of a minor to a friend, you are facing a minimum 5-year sentence.
Unless you are a Democrat or a close family member of one.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News