- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: That ICE Agent is fricked if State of MN puts him on trial
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:06 pm to Covingtontiger77
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:06 pm to Covingtontiger77
Why was this woman there in the first place?? Clearly seems like she was there to protest, impede law enforcement, and cause chaos which is what the commie mayor accused ICE of doing.
0
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:08 pm to Covingtontiger77
Justified kill.
Nothing will happen.
Nothing will happen.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:10 pm to Jimmy Russel
quote:
In re Neagle (1890)
Idaho v. Horiuchi (2001)
I am not sure about Neagle, but the Idaho v. Horiuchi case is simply stating that the supremacy clause means federal immunity applies to the actions of federal officials. It does not mean that the State cannot file state charges against the federal official.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:10 pm to Laugh More
quote:
Well that seems pretty clear it’s a good shoot, no?
We're talking about Democrats and politics here. The validity of the shoot is irrelevant to them as long as the political outcome is in their favor.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:20 pm to Covingtontiger77
Federal agent. He's good.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:22 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Please root for the good guys for once
Never. At least not until Trump is out of office.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:22 pm to justjoe906
quote:
The only angle I seen
You are obviously low iq and lack the mental capacity to properly analyze what happened
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:24 pm to jorconalx
This slow motion clearly shows ice officer was in the right. Slow motion is 2nd clip.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:25 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
The lack of reading comprehension on this board is astounding.
I said IF the ICE agent is put on trial by the State of MN then he is fricked- ala Derick Chauvin.
A jury in state court in MN is going to frick this ICE agent and a state judge will send away for a long time.
A federal officer performing his job would not be subject to state court.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:26 pm to Rebel
quote:Seriously? The poor baby almost got his footsie run over and then fired 3 shots when she's already past him.
This slow motion clearly shows ice officer was in the right. Slow motion is 2nd clip.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:27 pm to Covingtontiger77
This is completely justified. Other angle clearly shows the woman was driving into the officer and he only drew his gun once she started to roll forward
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:28 pm to tween the hedges
quote:
The poor baby almost got his foot pulled over and then fired 3 shots when she's already past him.
Well shite. We have another magic bullet theory. Ice shot her from behind, bullet did a 180 and entered the windshield.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:29 pm to tween the hedges
quote:
Seriously? The poor baby almost got his foot pulled over and then fired 3 shots when she's already past him.
She wasn't already past him, you fricking moron.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:31 pm to BigTigerJoe
Yeah, that dumb bitch was stop and go, just being annoying. She was clearly aggressive and accelerated into the officer.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:32 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:Its truly amazing how supposedly rational human beings can watch the same video and see it so different. It's like the blue/gray dress.
She wasn't already past him, you fricking moron.
The biggest risk he had was having his foot run over. His body was not in front of the car and he wasn't at risk of being killed.
That said I don't know why anyone would agree to be a cop. One bad day or miscue and your life is ruined. He has no chance if it's Minneapolis court.
But totally avoidable by a competent LEO.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:47 pm to Rebel
The slowed down version makes it clear as day that the shooting was completely justified. I don't even think this one is that close, and I am no where near an always "back the blue" sort of guy.
Haven't checked what the libs are saying, but I am guessing they are going to latch on to the slight curve at the end acting like that split second difference somehow makes it not objectively reasonable that the officer used force there.
Haven't checked what the libs are saying, but I am guessing they are going to latch on to the slight curve at the end acting like that split second difference somehow makes it not objectively reasonable that the officer used force there.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:47 pm to JimEverett
quote:
I am not sure about Neagle, but the Idaho v. Horiuchi case is simply stating that the supremacy clause means federal immunity applies to the actions of federal officials. It does not mean that the State cannot file state charges against the federal official.
A) Woman driving was not retreating
B) Agent in front of the vehicle was in imminent danger
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:49 pm to Tantal
Totally agreed on your point, but I was asking from a logical/unbiased point of view and whether or not the facts (as they stand now) are on the side of the officer(s).
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:49 pm to tween the hedges
quote:
But totally avoidable by a competent LEO.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:55 pm to Jugbow
quote:
It’s a white woman, Minnesota isn’t going to burn over this one.
You don't remember the riots when the Somali police officer shot and killed the white Australian lady? Man, they were turrible! Just turrible!
LINK
The 68 IQ goat-fricker got off with a slap on the wrist.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News