- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Teen who was arrested for reading the Bible in Wisconsin speaks at council meeting.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 11:58 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 8/4/23 at 11:58 am to AggieHank86
quote:
In the interim, I ask you (again) whether they had a permit.
Youve denied there were amplification devices, now youre waffling.
Damn, who would have thought.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:06 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Regardless of how hard the uniparty and MSM attempt to advertise and push them as normal, they'll always be deemed as an anomaly and freakish.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:08 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
they'll always be deemed as an anomaly and freakish.
I like freaks, drag queens and trannies aren't freaks. they're socially awkward kids who were perverted by adults and will never have a normal view of sexuality.
I don't blame the trannies, its the ridiculous social engineers pushing this on kids that is the issue.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:18 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:No, Roger, I said that I've not seen evidence that they promoters used amplification devices in violation of the ordinance.
Youve denied there were amplification devices, now youre waffling.
Please stop lying. It gets tiresome constantly correcting you.
Here is the relevant exchange:
quote:
they (presumably the drag performers) also had amplification devices. Just like the young man who was arrested.quote:
None of the clips I have seen corroborates this claim. Can you provide a clip, so we can confirm (a) use and (b) volume?
This post was edited on 8/4/23 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:19 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
No, Roger, I said that I've not seen evidence that they promoters used amplification devices in violation of the ordinance.
Well Hank, they had singers and dancers with microphones.
You know like most drag queen shows do.
I don't know why that perturbs you so much.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:19 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
AggieHank86
Do you have a job? If so, is it to get paid to post here? Are you retired? You post on literally every topic on this board. I’m not kidding. I read a post from you on every single topic on the Poli Board.
I read a lot on here and post some, but I go days without posting at times. Yet, here you are posting all of the time. All. Day. Long.
Does posting in here make you happy or does it rile you up?
You’re not the only one; that’s true.
But I can’t imagine spending my entire day posting online just to pick fights and be contrarian.
Lunch is over. I have to go back to work.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:20 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Again:
Well Hank, they had singers and dancers with microphones. You know like most drag queen shows do.
quote:again, did they have a permit?
Can you provide a clip, so we can confirm (a) use and (b) volume? In the interim, arguendo, let's assume it is true. Did they have a permit? Because the kid clearly did not
This post was edited on 8/4/23 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:21 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
again, did they have a permit?
I don't know. Do you have access to Google so I don't have to do work for you?
I dont mind, but you sure seem like you want everyone else to do your job.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:23 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:I am not the one claiming that a permitted group, holding a permitted event, violated the noise ordinance. The burden lies with you, Roger.
you sure seem like you want everyone else to do your job.
This post was edited on 8/4/23 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:30 pm to RogerTheShrubber
They're freaks. Aka... queer
Whether they call it a choice or being born that way, they'll never be accepted as the norm.
Whether they call it a choice or being born that way, they'll never be accepted as the norm.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:34 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
They're freaks. Aka... queer
Freaks are independent, walk to their own beat. Trannies and drag queens are as cookie cutter as they come. See one, see them all.
Its a copycat club for kids who never learned to think for themselves.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 2:43 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Define “obnoxious” as it relates to an ordinance designed to be weaponized.
It’s not my place to define it; the town defined it…in the ordinance.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 2:57 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:Let's say that he is blaring his sermon at 250 decibels. Ears are bleeding for three blocks in every direction.quote:True, but unless it is directly tied to an actual (MEASURABLE) decibel level, then I would defend his right to do so.
How would you like it if you were in the town square trying to chill and some buffoon was reading the Koran loudly? It would be irritating as hell.
And you see no violation, because the ordinance does not define "such volume or nature as to annoy or disturb any other reasonable person" using decibels?
Let's say your neighbor has decided that it would be fun to stand on his property, adjacent to your bedroom window, and blare reveille on his trumpet at max trumpet volume, six times per night. No violation?
OK
This post was edited on 8/4/23 at 3:04 pm
Posted on 8/4/23 at 3:09 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Not remotely what I said, Timmy. I said that he had no right to read in such a way as would violate the city ordinance:
Bullhorn yelling gospel, arrested. Bullhorn yelling to murder babies, we good.
And yes it depends on the city's ordinance but it also depends what side politically you are on.
This post was edited on 8/4/23 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 8/4/23 at 4:10 pm to dgnx6
quote:
And yes it depends on the city's ordinance but it also depends what side politically you are on.
We’ve had noise ordinances on the books for many years now, and I seriously cannot recall one human being even being stopped for the Boom Boom, rattling houses and businesses in all directions, much less actually arrested for actual real obnoxiousness, and with rap vulgarity as well.
I think all of this amplified noise business is a bunch of nonsense, a convenient excuse to rid themselves of a message they didn’t want to hear, and at a time and place where it was really stinging the most. To actually arrest someone for a noise infraction, without a warning even, is just a wee bit over the top, and that’s why I don’t buy that for a minute. This was intentionally silencing free speech. That’s all that was going on, and anyone with an ounce of integrity and honesty can clearly see that.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 4:44 pm to Meauxjeaux
No it shouldn't that cop looked like was enjoying it these cops are dirtbags
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:17 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Let's say that he is blaring his sermon at 250 decibels. Ears are bleeding for three blocks in every direction.
Didn’t happen.
quote:
Let's say your neighbor has decided that it would be fun to stand on his property, adjacent to your bedroom window, and blare reveille on his trumpet at max trumpet volume, six times per night
Also didn’t happen
quote:
And you see no violation, because the ordinance does not define "such volume or nature as to annoy or disturb any other reasonable person" using decibels?
Define “reasonable person.”
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:34 pm to AggieHank86
"The most valuable of all talents is that of never using two words when one will do." Guess who said this?
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:38 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Let's say that he is blaring his sermon at 250 decibels. Ears are bleeding for three blocks in every direction.quote:Let's say your neighbor has decided that it would be fun to stand on his property, adjacent to your bedroom window, and blare reveille on his trumpet at max trumpet volume, six times per night
Didn’t happen.quote:
Also didn’t happen

Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:03 pm to Bridget O
quote:
It’s to the point where I see your name and scroll right on by. You just love to argue.
The best thing that could ever happen to Hank would be for everyone to completely ignore him. He would have an aneurysm. And then none of us would have to read any more of his drivel.
Popular
Back to top


1




