- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:13 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Big words, long sentences, confuse rhar. Hank sorry.
Brevity IS the soul of wit.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:58 am to Mike da Tigah
Great job. Much respect for that fella. Truth is simple. Today the left over intellectualize and convolute truth until is has no base, from which we are told men can be women.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:06 am to AggieHank86
quote:
reasonable person
WTF
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:12 am to Mike da Tigah
What an amazing young man! His parents should be very proud of him. This young baw has more maturity and wisdom than many members of Congress.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:21 am to Mike da Tigah
Young men like him give me a tad bit of hope for our country
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:27 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Fake libertarian comes against free speech. Color me shocked!
Hank is correct in this case, and those of you arguing with him, WTF are y’all talking about? That’s not a free speech issue. It has nothing to do with the bible. Thte town has an ordinance, like most towns, preventing obnoxious disturbances. How would you like it if you were in the town square trying to chill and some buffoon was reading the Koran loudly? It would be irritating as hell.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:31 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I said that he had no right to read in such a way as would violate the city ordinance:
I didn't see any of the 'law' enforcement officers with a decibel meter measuring the exact level. So, it was a judgement call made by the 'law' and there was no warning given. This is outside of normal protocol and I hope the 'law' officers get reprimanded, but we all know that won't happen.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:37 am to Mike da Tigah
Good for him.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:41 am to Penrod
quote:
Hank is correct in this case, and those of you arguing with him, WTF are y’all talking about? That’s not a free speech issue. It has nothing to do with the bible. Thte town has an ordinance, like most towns, preventing obnoxious disturbances. How would you like it if you were in the town square trying to chill and some buffoon was reading the Koran loudly? It would be irritating as hell.
I wonder if a gathering of Christians in this same WI town had a gathering for a pro life event and they were being harassed by a buncha rabid Planned Parenthood rabble rousers with bullhorns and signs, I wonder if those PP protesters would have been arrested? I wonder?
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:46 am to Penrod
quote:
Hank is correct in this case
quote:
by Penrod
Surest sign the fake lawyer is wrong yet again
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:46 am to udtiger
quote:
Kid nailed it
Yep. Rare eloquence and obvious that he understands the entire Human psychological/spiritual dynamic. Future leader; and the future is now.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:47 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:Good grief. Do you even listen to yourself?quote:Fake libertarian comes against free speech.
Hank: he can read aloud to his heart’s content …
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:50 am to Penrod
quote:
How would you like it if you were in the town square trying to chill
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:55 am to Penrod
quote:it helps to set aside the notion that these people are actually proponents of the constitution. Once you accept that they are simply SoCon ideologues, everything they say makes perfect sense.
Hank is correct in this case, and those of you arguing with him, WTF are y’all talking about? That’s not a free speech issue. It has nothing to do with the bible.
Blaring the Bible on a loudspeaker? Perfectly acceptable. Blaring the Quran on the loudspeaker? Absolutely not.
Blaring Thomas Paine on the loudspeaker? Hurray! Blaring Karl Marx? String them up!
Blaring Rush Limbaugh reruns on the loudspeaker? Patriots! Blaring Rachel Maddow on the loudspeaker? Where are the cops? Why aren’t they enforcing the law?
nothing that these people say or do is based upon the constitution. Absolutely every bit of it is result-driven.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:57 am to mtb010
quote:one of the kid’s zealot friends is yelling about a decibel meter, so you just accept that as being the law? Fairly typical, actually.
I didn't see any of the 'law' enforcement officers with a decibel meter measuring the exact level.
The actual ordinance has been posted and discussed in detail. It says nothing about decibel level.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 8:14 am to AggieHank86
quote:
The actual ordinance has been posted and discussed in detail. It says nothing about decibel level.
If there is no set decibel level then how are people to know if they are exceeding it? So, it's just a judgement call by the 'law' officers and again, they did not use normal protocol and give a warning.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 8:27 am to AggieHank86
quote:
he can read aloud to his heart’s content, just not at a volume which would annoy or disturb a reasonable person
I don’t find pedos and groomers to be reasonable (by my definition).
What is your definition of reasonable?
In my mind, this young man, seems perfectly reasonable.
He points out the danger for authoritarian regimes, like Nazis.
The irony is that, this ordinance (written in a manner in which it can be weaponized) is something akin to what the Nazis would have probably abused as well in order to arrest Jews early on.
I can’t imagine myself ever defending such garbage.
You do you though.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 8:29 am to mtb010
quote:
So, it's just a judgement call by the 'law' officers
In determining what is a reasonable “noise” no less.
FWIW, Hank didn’t truly define “noise” when pressed earlier.
Just another example of Leftist Hank supporting the goose-steppers.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 8:30 am to jimmy the leg
quote:You are focused upon content. The ordinance is content-neutral and focuses on VOLUME.
What is your definition of reasonable? In my mind, this young man, seems perfectly reasonable. He points out the danger for authoritarian regimes, like Nazis.
quote:of course not. You are a bomb-throwing ideologue. The very notion of being conciliatory towards your neighbor is entirely foreign to you, even for something as simple as lowering the volume of your ranting.
I can’t imagine myself ever defending such garbage.
Page 2 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News