Started By
Message

re: Switzerland facing 39% US tariff as president leaves Washington empty-handed

Posted on 8/6/25 at 5:41 pm to
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5295 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

But why reject zero vs zero, it's equal which is what President Trump said was his goal.


I'm assuming, because I'm not privy to private conversations, that Trump's tariff policy is aimed at trade deficits, not equal tariffs. We run a very large trade deficit with Europe and it's partially structural by now. At the time the EU was formed, we ran basically balanced trade with that bloc of countries, now our deficit with the EU is north of $200 billion a year and going up. If Trump's tariffs bring that back into balance, he'll probably be willing to revisit the negotiations.
This post was edited on 8/6/25 at 5:47 pm
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17241 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 5:45 pm to
I would buy that if he were not also raising tariffs on countries like the UK and Brazil and other with who we have a trade SURPLUS for years.

Posted by FMtTXtiger
Member since Oct 2018
5318 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 5:49 pm to
i didn't like swiss cheese anyway.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14682 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

Yet Trump rejected it out of hand and gave no explanation. Why? Due to donors or something? What is the reason, I don't get it.


The EU has a bunch of other protectionist shite that they don’t call tariffs. So even at 0-0 it really isn’t.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5295 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 6:05 pm to
quote:


I would buy that if he were not also raising tariffs on countries like the UK and Brazil and other with who we have a trade SURPLUS for years.


We run small surpluses with a few countries, which is dwarfed by our deficits with others. Your question was why he wouldn't settle for zero tariffs between the US and Europe, and I gave you the answer. The goal is not to balance our tariffs. The goal is to balance the totality of our foreign trade and stem the bleeding of jobs and dollars.

As for the UK and others, maybe they want to avoid attempts to bypass tariffs by manipulating the country of origin. Whatever the reason for the UK tariff, the reason for the EU is obvious; they run a massive surplus with the US and it has to be fixed. If the UK tariff results in a significant imbalance to their detriment, I suspect that level will be revisited.
This post was edited on 8/6/25 at 6:14 pm
Posted by Swampcat
Member since Dec 2003
12705 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 6:08 pm to
Why though would he reject 0 for 0? Did Helvetica reject Trumps Swiss bank account?
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
27183 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

I just don't understand why anybody would want tariffs on anybody either to import or export.

There should be no such thing as tariffs, import duties, import controls or anything like that. We buy your stuff we like, you can buy our stuff, no tax or tariff either way.

I can only understand a slight bit of protectionism on critical and defense related stuff like steel and so on.


I don't often agree with you but here we can sorta find common ground. Just to find some justification for their not being zero for all is that a 10 percent tariff would not be steep but would over the long haul cause every country to be more self sufficient.

Makes no sense that something made in Switzerland should not be able to be made in the USA (and vice versa). So make it here... no tariff and no overseas shipping cost required.

Relying on other countries for your needs is not sound policy.
Posted by RiverCityTider
Jacksonville, Florida
Member since Oct 2008
6793 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 6:34 pm to
Europe has a VAT tax which is worse than a tarrif.
Posted by mule74
Watersound Beach
Member since Nov 2004
12857 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 7:30 pm to
My Rolexes fixing to sky rocket.

In reality though I’m positive that the Swiss will cave. The mass production brands like Omega, Cartier, Breitling, Rolex (etc.) will get crushed by this. They will push the government hard to make a deal.

I don’t think it will hurt Patek and AP as much.
This post was edited on 8/7/25 at 12:21 pm
Posted by FrontlineTiger
Member since Aug 2024
927 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 7:40 pm to
They are gonna bash him no matter what he does so Fukk em and act like they not here
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
5172 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

The mass production brands like Omega, Cartier, Breitling, Rolex (etc.) will get crushed by this. They will push the government hard to make a deal.


The watches are a perfect anecdote for the current situation. I remember when Rolex sued Costco because it was sourcing their watches from European authorized dealers and then selling them at substantial discounts as the result of the markup Rolex set for sales to its US dealers.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
23016 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

Europe has a VAT tax which is worse than a tarrif.


Where do y'all get this smooth brained shite? A VAT is just a sales tax. It isn't protectionist, it isn't discretionary. Domestic goods are taxed exactly the same as imports under a VAT
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63332 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

I just don't understand why anybody would want tariffs on anybody either to import or export.
Some people think overpaying for stuff generates wealth.

Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63332 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

Europe has a VAT tax which is worse than a tarrif.
Please explain.
Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
9172 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

frick yo Rolex.

1. fly to Switzerland
2. buy Rolex tariff free
3. buy long sleeve shirt
4. wear watch back home
5. ???
6. profit

ETA:
quote:

Europe has a VAT tax which is worse than a tariff.
crap, there goes my plan
This post was edited on 8/6/25 at 8:36 pm
Posted by TigerBaitOohHaHa
Member since Jan 2023
2068 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:38 pm to
Swiss cheese should have been discounted for all them holes anyways. I'm tired of paying for a full slice of cheese and getting half the cheese
Posted by fjlee90
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2016
8521 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

I would buy that if he were not also raising tariffs on countries like the UK and Brazil and other with who we have a trade SURPLUS for years.


It’s because he can. Why get an even deal when he can get a favorable deal?
Posted by djmed
Member since Aug 2020
4061 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:11 pm to
Just think of the cheese!!
My mushroom swiss!!
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17241 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:51 pm to
"It’s because he can. Why get an even deal when he can get a favorable deal?"

Favorable to whom? Not to me if I want to buy a Rolex. Not to you if you want to buy Swiss Chocolates. Not to someone else who wants to buy a Swiss Army Knife.

To me it seems like a way to raise taxes for the government, but via the supermarket, the Rolex store, etc. People will see Swiss Chocolates costing quite a bit and blame either the supermarket or the chocolate company and not think (well most of them won't think) that there is a "tarrif tax" there.

We should have zero tariffs where the other side agrees to it and make better sh*t so people will buy our stuff and not theirs.

Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
7931 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

Karin Keller-Sutter

Never trust a Karin.
We don't actually need anything they make, that's the problem of luxury items.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram