- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
That's likely what they're going to do.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So either a new amendment or overruling case law that's approaching 130 years in age and has a large progeny of case law, statutory law, and administrative law built around that precedent over that time
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:09 pm to Jake88
But not right now if they're only going to address the injunction issue.
That's why this particular case seems a strange one to use if they were going to eliminate the injunctions. This is the clearest illegal EO as the law stands now and the impact is severe.
That's why this particular case seems a strange one to use if they were going to eliminate the injunctions. This is the clearest illegal EO as the law stands now and the impact is severe.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
Awe.... you are crying again. Let me find your judge Judy doll
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
Setting aside the nationwide injunction issue, what case might lead to an ending of birthright citizenship obviating the need for an amendment to the Constitution?
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:16 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
you are crying again.
wut
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:18 pm to Jake88
quote:
Setting aside the nationwide injunction issue, what case might lead to an ending of birthright citizenship obviating the need for an amendment to the Constitution?
This is actually an interesting question, because if the nationwide injunction issue is resolved, then it's kind of in limbo until someone has standing to sue, I believe. I'm not sure if the suits cover anything else (again, if someone wants to correct me, I'm all ears). That would require the EO to do something to affect a person to create the standing to sue and start the court process that would lead THAT case before the USSC.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Aren't there a few other cases consolidated with this one?
Trump v. CASA
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:22 pm to FLTech
1. I will believe it when it happens.
2. I have not been paying attention to SCOTUS lately, are we expecting a ruling on a case that involves a nationwide injunction to be coming soon (i.e. the next 2 weeks)?
2. I have not been paying attention to SCOTUS lately, are we expecting a ruling on a case that involves a nationwide injunction to be coming soon (i.e. the next 2 weeks)?
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
I don’t know law so forgive my ignorance but isn’t this case squarely on authority of district courts on issuing nationwide injunctions and birthright citizenship isn’t being reviewed here? If that’s the case, what’s the big deal you’re talking about and why does it matter which case they picked?
I’m genuinely curious and not trying to be an arse or anything.
Never mind, you answered and I guess I didn’t see it
I’m genuinely curious and not trying to be an arse or anything.
Never mind, you answered and I guess I didn’t see it
This post was edited on 5/14/25 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:27 pm to FLTech
Why would anyone be convinced the SC rules in favor of MAGA?
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So they are likely only going to rule on the order itself and not the nationwide injunction aspect?
Based on the reporting, only the injunction aspect. I haven't kept up but I don't think the appeals courts have ruled. If someone has a correction I'd love to read the opinions.
Again, if the total case was ripe, the USSC could dispose of both issues without fear of what I posted. They could rule the EO Unconstitutional and address the injunction portion separately without fear of the impact the temporal gap would permit.
You haven't kept up on a lot of shite but you're very quick to peck on that keyboard....you fricking can't help yourself. When you hit the 500k post mark I'm going to start a thread with a GoFundMe account to get you a few thousand bucks so you can take a long vacation to a place with no internet connection .
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is actually an interesting question, because if the nationwide injunction issue is resolved, then it's kind of in limbo until someone has standing to sue, I believe. I'm not sure if the suits cover anything else (again, if someone wants to correct me, I'm all ears). That would require the EO to do something to affect a person to create the standing to sue and start the court process that would lead THAT case before the USSC
I understand what you're saying..... what qould such a case look like?
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
plainly illegal status of the EO
The EO is illegal? As in Trump broke the law in writing it? Which law did it break? Are the Dems gonna charge Trump with a crime again? Are you really a lawyer?
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:55 pm to Adajax
So, a big ongoing thread about a lawsuit that nobody knows what it is even about! Amazing!
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:02 pm to FLTech
I won't feel good about this one until they rule on it. Roberts and Amy are snakes in the grass. and who knows what other "conservative" Justice might step up to rule against the Trump admin if they get chosen to take some of the heat off of Roberts or Amy.
This SHOULD be a slam dunk case for the Trump admin. But TDS and GOPe gonna' TDS and GOPe.
This SHOULD be a slam dunk case for the Trump admin. But TDS and GOPe gonna' TDS and GOPe.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:04 pm to FLTech
Be careful what you wish for.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:your knowledge on the legal system is a joke, just like you
with the plainly illegal status of the EO and the drastic impact non-injunction would create.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News