- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Study: Temp adjustments account for ‘Nearly all of Warming’ In climate data
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:48 am
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:48 am
tsk, tsk, tsk
Can't have a climate crisis if you don't eff with the data. That explains why EVERY climate model was wrong. They were inputting adjusted data to get their warming trend, rather than the actual numbers.
Oh, and before you get your panties in a wad
Its all bullshite. A contrived hoax
And also before you pee in your pants about its origins, this team consists of scientists from the EPA, MIT, NASA, a Fulbright Scholar, and also from our very own ULL
LINK
Can't have a climate crisis if you don't eff with the data. That explains why EVERY climate model was wrong. They were inputting adjusted data to get their warming trend, rather than the actual numbers.
Oh, and before you get your panties in a wad
quote:
The peer-reviewed study
quote:
The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.
quote:
“Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.
quote:
However, each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. That was accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU.
quote:
The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.
Its all bullshite. A contrived hoax
And also before you pee in your pants about its origins, this team consists of scientists from the EPA, MIT, NASA, a Fulbright Scholar, and also from our very own ULL
LINK
27
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:49 am to RobbBobb
It's a complete fraud.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:50 am to RobbBobb
I initially read the title as "Trump adjustments account for..." and got confused for a second.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:50 am to RobbBobb
But there is a guy in Fairbanks, Alaska that works on ice cores that says it's all true.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:51 am to RobbBobb
But muh climate deniers. Man made climate change is such a hoax.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:51 am to RobbBobb
it won't matter global warming ...scratch that...climate change is their baby jesus sky god.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:51 am to FooManChoo
quote:
I initially read the title as "Trump adjustments account for..." and got confused for a second.
I certainly can understand, because Trump is turning up the heat on CNN. They may be completely melted by the fall
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:55 am to tedmarkuson
I'll be honest, I have no idea what to believe about this topic. And that's sad.
It's a no brainer that we should take care of the planet through some simple sustainable measures.
It's ridiculous that data is fudged to create fear and waste money on things that have no impact.
It's a no brainer that we should take care of the planet through some simple sustainable measures.
It's ridiculous that data is fudged to create fear and waste money on things that have no impact.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:58 am to Xenophon
quote:
It's ridiculous that data is fudged to create fear and waste money on things that have no impact.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 11:01 am to Xenophon
quote:
I have no idea what to believe about this topic.
You already said all you need to know
quote:
It's ridiculous that data is fudged
Posted on 7/6/17 at 11:02 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
But there is a guy in Fairbanks, Alaska that works on ice cores that says it's all true.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 11:04 am to Xenophon
quote:
I'll be honest, I have no idea what to believe about this topic. And that's sad.
It's a no brainer that we should take care of the planet through some simple sustainable measures.
It's ridiculous that data is fudged to create fear and waste money on things that have no impact.
I believe the biggest step forward is simply carbon sequestration. Why Leo DiCaprio and all his cronies aren't building carbon sequestration facilities is beyond me. It's not about fixing the issue, it's about punishing the other side.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 11:07 am to RobbBobb
Somewhere, SpideyTuba is in the corner sucking his thumb.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 11:11 am to RobbBobb
quote:Opens study
The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.
CTRL+F "ICOADS" and gets no results
If your claim is that "nearly all of warming" in climate data is from adjustments, one would think that you would have to include ocean data, since that's, you know, most of the earth's surface. But they don't include any graphs or quantification of the adjustments made to ICOADS (the raw ocean data) in HadSST or ERSST (the two major homogenized ocean series).
I wonder why they might not be keen to include that?
Oh, right, because the major adjustments to the ocean data warm the past and therefore show less present-day warming.
So instead they just cherry-pick a bunch of land records with no rhyme or reason and shite out a glorified WUWT blog post. What journal was this crap published in? E&E?
This post was edited on 7/6/17 at 11:15 am
Posted on 7/6/17 at 11:14 am to Xenophon
quote:
It's a no brainer that we should take care of the planet through some simple sustainable measures.
It's the one thing that I think most could agree on: we should be doing everything we can to minimize our impact on the environment. That should be done on an individual level and not at a gov't level. Consumers will decide where this goes.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 11:22 am to Iosh
quote:Why would they do that, pray tell?
because the major adjustments to the ocean data warm the past
Perhaps something to do with recent inclusion of engine intake (physically much warmer) measurements on freighters vs exclusive past use of ocean buoys?
Posted on 7/6/17 at 11:26 am to Iosh
Soo...
quote:
So which dire, doom and gloom, predictions that these "scientists" have made in the last half century have come true? If, in the passage of time, the data doesn't match the hypothesis, then the hypothesis needs to be thrown out as useless or modify it and try again. Don't you agree?
Posted on 7/6/17 at 11:28 am to NC_Tigah
quote:Buoys are fairly recent and the adjustment you refer to was an order of magnitude smaller and exclusively affected the last few years. The big adjustment you see illustrated in the graph (which as far as I know has been around as long as homogenized sea records have been a thing) is a bucket-engine adjustment.
Perhaps something to do with recent inclusion of engine intake (physically much warmer) measurements on freighters vs exclusive past use of ocean buoys?
Posted on 7/6/17 at 11:28 am to Dale51
Al Gore scoffs at this report from his Gulfstream as it taxis up the runway to his next PowerPoint presentation on why you're ruining the globe.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 11:32 am to Dale51
quote:Which dire, doom and gloom predictions are you referring to? Please use your words and do not hastily google and copy/paste a list, which will be inaccurate and/or larded with predictions from non-"scientists" like Al Gore (or non-climate scientists like Ehrlich).
So which dire, doom and gloom, predictions that these "scientists" have made in the last half century have come true?
This post was edited on 7/6/17 at 11:35 am
Page 1 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News