- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Study: Temp adjustments account for ‘Nearly all of Warming’ In climate data
Posted on 7/7/17 at 11:49 am to Iosh
Posted on 7/7/17 at 11:49 am to Iosh
quote:
Because they wanted more accurate readings from rain gauges.
They why the hell have we paused? And at times showed cooling? Just look at the RAW numbers since the morning readings started. Where is this rapid warming?
And why are they eliminating stations by the 1000s? If theyre so interested in accuracy? Quit being sucked in.
1
Posted on 7/7/17 at 11:49 am to RobbBobb
quote:
Why am I not surprised
Because you appear to live in a different world than the rest of us.
Posted on 7/7/17 at 11:51 am to RobbBobb
quote:Global warming is a trend about the globe. It's neither uniform nor constant in particular areas. If you drill down to specific slices of the earth's surface like the continental US you will see lots of places where temperature pauses or even trends down slightly over shorter periods. The skeptics you're reading depend on this kind of cherry picking to make everyone think this is some kind of massive fraud instead of completely normal climatology that is openly discussed in scientific journals. That's why your OP study contains lots of very specific graphs about "number of 100 degree days in Chicago" or whatever but doesn't discuss the ocean adjustments and never makes a simple global graph like the one I posted at the bottom of the last page. Because that would give the game away and show that overall, the adjustments push the trend down, not up.
They why the hell have we paused? And at times showed cooling? Just look at the RAW numbers since the morning readings started. Where is this rapid warming?
This post was edited on 7/7/17 at 11:54 am
Posted on 7/7/17 at 11:54 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Because you appear to live in a different world than the rest of us.
Thank God
However, I am sorry to hear about your cities underwater, and your starving people, melting glaciers, and sky high gas prices in your world. If that helps any?
Hit me up if you need a place to stay over here, when things get really bad over there
Posted on 7/7/17 at 12:01 pm to Iosh
Well, you just keep believing in the adjusted numbers, and I'll stick to the raw data
Because if Trump hired a bunch of guys that started adjusting the numbers cooler, you'd be screaming to use the raw data. And you know it
Because if Trump hired a bunch of guys that started adjusting the numbers cooler, you'd be screaming to use the raw data. And you know it
Posted on 7/7/17 at 12:01 pm to Xenophon
quote:
It's a no brainer that we should take care of the planet through some simple sustainable measures.
True.
quote:
It's ridiculous that data is fudged to create fear and waste money on things that have no impact.
And if the data has to be fudged and created, then it probably isn't true. if what they are saying was truth and undeniable, then they would not have to bend the data to say what they want it to say.
Posted on 7/7/17 at 12:02 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Thank God
Told you...
quote:
I am sorry to hear about your cities underwater, and your starving people, melting glaciers, and sky high gas prices in your world.
None of those things are "mine." I'm not an absolutist on this topic. I find it ridiculous that you are.
Posted on 7/7/17 at 12:04 pm to RobbBobb
quote:Then congratulations, you believe the Earth is actually warming more than most scientists do.
Well, you just keep believing in the adjusted numbers, and I'll stick to the raw data
This post was edited on 7/7/17 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 7/7/17 at 12:05 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
None of those things are "mine."
Ha. That was damn funny and you know it
Posted on 7/7/17 at 12:07 pm to RobbBobb
Meh, a bit.
It's still fantasy, and so is the opposite.
It's still fantasy, and so is the opposite.
Posted on 7/7/17 at 12:26 pm to Iosh
quote:
Iosh
Keep up the good fight. It's like most posters in here have never taken a basic class on statistics or scientific methods. Though I'd hope that much on that subject would be common sense. More evidence that most politicians have no business being placed in scientific oversight positions. 
Posted on 7/7/17 at 12:38 pm to KamaCausey_LSU
quote:Likewise, most scientists have no business being placed in positions directing public policy.
More evidence that most politicians have no business being placed in scientific oversight positions.
Case in point:
This post was edited on 7/7/17 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 7/7/17 at 1:35 pm to FearlessFreep
I like this thread
Posted on 7/16/17 at 4:30 pm to RobbBobb
Bump due to new thread on same report.
This post was edited on 7/16/17 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 7/16/17 at 9:09 pm to Iosh
quote:Well, it seems that premise got blown to hell too.
Well, you just keep believing in the adjusted numbers, and I'll stick to the raw data
Then congratulations, you believe the Earth is actually warming more than most scientists do.
Page 12 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News