re: Steve Scalise Frustrates Chris Wallace- Election Stolen

If it was stolen/illegitimate the Republicans response has be laughable. See Scalise and his dancing around the subject. I don't see how people can come on here and get riled up about the election, but support the top establishment Republicans.

They didn't even know enough about the audited materials to know what to ask for properly. This they didn't ask for a lot of stuff and asked for other things that made no sense.

You can argue the facts till hell freezes over but on the early morning of November 4, 2020, at approximately 4:00 am the United States of America ceased to exist.

Do you cringe? When you can no longer verify the authenticity of individual ballots you have lost control of your voting system, and with that, you've lost your country.

At the core of a valid functioning country is an honest and verifiable voting system. When you lose that........

Facts are stubborn things - John Adams

quote:

---

What's wrong with saying it is that is not true.

---

That statement makes no sense - at all -

quote:

---

No matter how much you don't like the outcome, no matter how many times you repeat it: Trump lost and Biden won.

---

But this gives me enough context to maybe guess at what you were trying to say.

The integral fact is that the election was illegitimate. The results should not have been certified - at any level by any authority.

And the illegitimacy was done precisely for the reason that it makes it ridiculously easy to CHEAT = mail out millions of extra ballots to addressees who didn't request them - allow anonymous operative to gather up those ballots and "submit" them by dropping bundles of them off in unsupervised collection boxes where some other person comes along and delivers them to be counted in the total vote. No idea whatsoever about the legitimacy of these ballots - no attempt made to verify the person's name on the ballot even knows it was submitted.

It is open invitation for massive fraud - in fact the only thing that prevents them from submitting 200 million ballots from some rural precinct in Louisiana is that they don't have a truck that big.

Anyone with half a brain knows exactly what happened. Every statistical analysis of the vote totals and voting patterns screams out FRAUD!!!!!

And the very people who proposed this monstrous process and then benefitted from it are the ones who scream so loudly when anyone questions their motives or their actions in preventing anyone from looking into it.

This is not hard stuff to rationalize or analyze - To disregard it is to admit that you are just happy with the result.

This reminds me of Crimson Tide fans who know the refs cheat but glory in the results and mock anyone who points it out.

quote:

---

Scalise balked at answering Wallace's question. Does he think the election was stolen? It's a "yes" or "no" answer.

---

If Scalise is like me, the answer is “I don’t know”. I’m suspicious. If I had to guess I would guess that the Democrats used the changed rules to illegally harvest enough votes to change a few swing states. Was it enough to change the winner? Probably.

There's no reason to answer that question. It doesn't matter what Steve Scalise thinks. Was the law followed?

Federal voting laws are Constitutional. Even though States can run their own elections, our Constitution preserves a certain level of fairness in our election laws. (Even if that fairness is illegally violated by those running the elections).

If the Legislatures don't like the way Congress wants them to run their elections, then they can pick their Presidential Electors without an election.

quote:

---

They didn't even know enough about the audited materials to know what to ask for properly. This they didn't ask for a lot of stuff and asked for other things that made no sense.

---

Maricopa gave them NOTHING. Everything the auditors received had to be ripped from clenched claws of the Maricopa Board

quote:

---

didn't ask for a lot of stuff and asked for other things that made no sense

---

CN asked for all pertinent materials. None were provided! The Senate asked for all pertinent materials. None were provided. The court directed the Board. It refused to cooperate. When it finally became obvious Maricopa Board Members might find their asses in a jail cell, they forwarded some materials which CN was able to use. When CN asked for clarification of materials provided, methods, etc., Maricopa refused cooperation. So CN decided to proceed with what they had rather than continue to be delayed.

The fact it would even occur to you to try to take the side of the POS Maricopa Board in this is unfricking believable!

quote:

---

I love that we've gone to 100% fraud supreme court overturning election. States all decertifying

To we just aren't sure if there was fraud because some states didn't follow all their rules.

---

Do you understand what you are addressing? Do you understand what SCOTUS "overturning the election" actually means? Do you understand what "states decertifying" actually means? Do you understand how states ignoring election law actually interfaces with those concepts?