Steve Scalise Frustrates Chris Wallace- Election Stolen

quote:

---

WALLACE: So you think the election was -- stolen?

---

The balls on this putz.

Yes, Chris, the entire country knows this shite was stolen. Don't act like you're a caveman just now seeing fire.

Some SoS's simply violated their state's election law by changing rules without legislative approval. Those states should not have been certified.

Scalise balked at answering Wallace's question. Does he think the election was stolen? It's a "yes" or "no" answer.

Well, he didn't say it was a legitimate election. His non answer 3 times to a yes or no question is telling. The narrative is the election was NOT stolen. Scalise didn't agree with that.

I'm sure he's run a cost/benefit analysis as to his public approach on this and for whatever reason concluded this approach. And I'm not necessarily saying I agree, but there's probably more to it than we think of on the spot.

I know that's "sinful" to suggest, but I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. I have to do so if I'm giving, say, Desantis the benefit of the doubt in that same way because to my knowledge he hasn't necessarily come right out and said the election was stolen, in no uncertain terms. And I won't question his motives on that, but will instead trust his judgment.

So don't say the election was fraudulent because the Republicans have some grand plan haha? You people never learn. Scalise is getting rich as hell in DC. He does not care. There is your answer.

Nope, I did not say anything about a "grand plan" on the part of Republicans. In fact, I would more assume that each individual's choice in approach is based on their own situation.

quote:

---

So Scalise wusses out on his response?

---

How did he wuss out? He answered the question that piece of shite Wallace kept repeating it over and over because he didn't get the answer he was fishing for. The only thing Scalise did wrong was the way he answered. He should have been more clear and said. I cannot 100% answer if the election was stolen or not stolen. Because of the fact that some states didn't follow their own laws that were on the books and allowed longer voting periods of absentee voting and mail in voting that were against laws that were on the books in these certain states. Then the legislatures of these states certified these elections that were conducted under conditions that were not consistent with the rules set by these same legislatures in these states. Based upon this cannot tell you 100% if these elections were honest or not.

Again, why didn't he say "yes I think it was a stolen election"? From a political perspective it is a win win for him with his base. Why didn't he say it? Everything else you posted is just BS political speak.