- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/1/26 at 8:21 am to Ingeniero
I am pro life yes but only for real American babies.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 8:29 am to crewdepoo
It also says: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
If they are not domiciled in the state, as is the case with with pending asylum cases or birth tourists, an argument can certainly be made that their state citizenship is in question.... This is the case Alito made. Of course, these people will just go to blue states where they will be allowed to feed from the host like maggots until there is nothing left.
But it doesn't matter. If a foreign national has a child here, deny any visa renewals and send them back. If an illegal has a child here, deport immediately. They can take the child with them or leave it here with American caregivers.
If they are not domiciled in the state, as is the case with with pending asylum cases or birth tourists, an argument can certainly be made that their state citizenship is in question.... This is the case Alito made. Of course, these people will just go to blue states where they will be allowed to feed from the host like maggots until there is nothing left.
But it doesn't matter. If a foreign national has a child here, deny any visa renewals and send them back. If an illegal has a child here, deport immediately. They can take the child with them or leave it here with American caregivers.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 8:35 am to stout
You are seriously suggesting that state governments refuse to issue certificates of live birth to American citizens? Wow.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 8:45 am to stout
Here is the text.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 8:51 am to TBoy
If a foreign military invaded and occupied the US, their children would be US citizens according to Roberts and ACB
This post was edited on 7/1/26 at 9:04 am
Posted on 7/1/26 at 9:10 am to stout
If the federal government would have allowed the southern states to peacefully leave the union we certainly could.
This post was edited on 7/1/26 at 9:11 am
Posted on 7/1/26 at 9:12 am to VOR
quote:
Oh, my. What did the Easter Bunny bring you this year?
A memo claiming that white supremacists are our number one threat.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 9:20 am to Don Quixote
quote:
If a foreign military invaded and occupied the US, their children would be US citizens according to Roberts and ACB
Not likely. As members of a foreign military, they would be subject to the jurisdiction of the foreign nation, just as American soldiers stationed abroad are under US jurisdiction.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 9:27 am to TBoy
Just as the parents of the anchor babies are subject to jurisdiction of their home country.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 9:51 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
If a foreign national has a child here, deny any visa renewals and send them back. If an illegal has a child here, deport immediately. They can take the child with them or leave it here with American caregivers
Should be the way it is, but of course they use the children to invoke an emotional decision.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 10:15 am to crewdepoo
quote:
Youre irrational
Hahahahahahah that’s rich coming from your delusional Marxist self
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:33 pm to Vacherie Saint
"All persons ..in the United States.. are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:33 pm to crewdepoo
again... the baby may be legally a citizen, but the parents can be deported, have their visa revoked, or not renewed. They can choose to take their baby home with them or leave it here, but they can't all stay.
Nothing in the ruling prevents this.
Nothing in the ruling prevents this.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 9:45 am to Vacherie Saint
Correct, the ruling changed nothing
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News