- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St. Louis grand jury indicts McCloskeys
Posted on 10/6/20 at 6:26 pm to chalmetteowl
Posted on 10/6/20 at 6:26 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
If it was a prop how would you know?
Why would I worry about the worries of potential violent aggression by people showing all the signs of violent aggression in a time plagued by violent aggression in an area with a history of violent aggression?
0
Posted on 10/6/20 at 6:38 pm to jatilen
Should have chosen a judge trail . The DA picks the jury , I’d bet each juror was not vetted properly . The only way I can explain this insane asinine judgement .
Posted on 10/6/20 at 6:40 pm to jatilen
Biggest load of bullshite since the OJ verdict.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 6:41 pm to jatilen
Went for my annual checkup at my primary doctor today. We talked about politics, as usual. He is a very conservative lifelong Baptist. Told me that he had bought a 9mm handgun recently, "due to political climate." I was stunned. This guy is as peaceful as they come.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 6:42 pm to Jspaspa3303
quote:
Should have chosen a judge trail . The DA picks the jury , I’d bet each juror was not vetted properly . The only way I can explain this insane asinine judgement .
There was no judgment. This was a grand jury indictment.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 6:43 pm to jimmarley
They need to sue the ever living crap out of the DA for dropping the charges on the protestors and making them feel unsafe in their home. Maybe the governor can launch an investigation into the DA.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 6:57 pm to Kirk Herbstreit
So, they brandish weapons after a mob breaks down their gate and surrounds their home. They get indicted for brandishing the weapons (apparently counter of the laws in the books), the tresspassers go scott free.
Her election opponent needs to be driving the point that Gardner doesn't believe you have the right to protect yourself, home, or family.
Her election opponent needs to be driving the point that Gardner doesn't believe you have the right to protect yourself, home, or family.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 7:04 pm to BobABooey
Boycott the Cardinals
This post was edited on 10/6/20 at 7:09 pm
Posted on 10/6/20 at 7:05 pm to SirWinston
quote:
grand jury that rendered this verdict
Grand juries only hear the prosecution's side of an event. The state is going to get crushed in court.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 7:23 pm to Clames
quote:
Boycott the Cardinals
Keep the Catholics out of this.
or
They tried that. The Cardinals simply moved to Arizona.
(Football) Followed by the Rams
or
Since Puhols left, they aren't worth seeing anyway.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 7:51 pm to jatilen
The government won’t be there to protect you. But they will show up to prosecute you.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 7:54 pm to Texas Yarddog
quote:
Her election opponent needs to be driving the point that Gardner doesn't believe you have the right to protect yourself, home, or family.
Her opponent is a Republican. He might get 25%.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 8:43 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
There was no judgment. This was a grand jury indictment.
Sorry , I read that wrong . You’re correct . Charges will be filed they will have their day in court.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:17 pm to chalmetteowl
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/18/21 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:43 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:MJ about to be accused of “defending” something the herd dislikes.quote:There was no judgment. This was a grand jury indictment.
Should have chosen a judge trail . The DA picks the jury , I’d bet each juror was not vetted properly . The only way I can explain this insane asinine judgement .
This post was edited on 10/7/20 at 8:45 am
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:44 pm to lsutiger2010
I was a GJ in this court. The only information regarding any issue is fed to you by the state/gov. In one year, the GJ said no only once. Let this shite show go, its just a shill. The defedants will sue and come out in good shape. The ussue is within the courts/ fed attirneys.
Posted on 10/7/20 at 7:08 am to AggieHank86
quote:
MJ about to be accused of “defending” something the herd dislikes.
The herd is quite often right.....
BTW, go on and tell us again how the McCloskeys' tore down their own gate and how it was a nothingburger for the Police to alter evidence gathered in the case.....
Posted on 10/7/20 at 7:11 am to jatilen
quote:
5 On Your Side reported about the tension between the lead detective on the case, Sgt. Curtis Burgdorf, and Hinckley over the wording of the court document known as the probable cause statement. Burgdorf sent a list of multiple concerns he had with the way Hinckley wrote the document and refused to sign it until the concerns were addressed. 5 On Your Side has learned Burgdorf was not among the witnesses prosecutors called to testify before the grand jury, but some of the protesters accused of trespassing on the McCloskeys’ property during the confrontation did testify.
Holy shite balls
Posted on 10/7/20 at 7:39 am to jatilen
quote:
Gov. Mike Parson has said he would pardon the McCloskeys should they be convicted.
I wonder what its like to have a competent Governor?
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News