Started By
Message

re: ST. George WINS Incorporation is a reality!

Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:37 pm to
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164137 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:37 pm to
frick ALL THE HATERS AND LOSERS WHO FOUGHT A 10 YEAR LOSING BATTLE YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE
Posted by Red Stick Rambler
Member since Jun 2011
1155 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:39 pm to
Does anyone know what the next steps are? When does the City of St. George actually become a reality?
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48917 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

LOL at LSURussian the "principled conservative" boomer who is oddly liberal on many issues


Hes a simp cuck dumbass frick
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422465 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:39 pm to
The absolute state of MOP today
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
7312 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:40 pm to
I' havent been following this for long time. Anyone know what the plan will be for students living in St George that currently go to EBR Magnet schools?
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57220 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:41 pm to
Let’s hope the boundaries are retroactive to the day of the vote.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
52977 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:41 pm to
Instead of just buying a house in southdowns like a real white person the St. George people had to get Gordon and sue everybody for 10 years
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22148 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Can someone post a map of St. George?


Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51609 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:44 pm to
This part was nice...

quote:

No voter or elector residing or owning land in the proposed area of incorporation objected to the petition. Thus, one can reasonably conclude they found the plan adequate. Only those persons have a real and actual interest in that claim. Only they can claim insufficient information in the petition to make an informed vote.

Cole neither resides in nor owns property in St. George. He did not, and could not, vote in the election. Consequently, he has no real or actual interest in challenging the sufficiency of the petition. Because no one from within the incorporated area objected to it, the court of appeal erred in considering the sufficiency of the petition. Thus, we reverse.8



quote:

8 Even if Cole had standing to challenge the sufficiency of the petition, we find no error in the trial court’s conclusion that the plan for the provision of services was statutorily compliant. The trial court’s finding that the plan was “minimally” compliant is true inasmuch as the statute itself requires minimal compliance in its silence as to the requirements of the plan. Thus, regardless of the standing holding, we would reverse the court of appeal on the merit.


State Supreme Court basically told the Appellate "do you even law, baw?"
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95429 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Anybody got a round number of tax revenue that is owed?


Minimum of $125m

(2019 to present, assuming $25m/year they got shunted to the general fund)
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95429 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

I' havent been following this for long time. Anyone know what the plan will be for students living in St George that currently go to EBR Magnet schools?


Nothing yet.

St George schools aren’t a thing yet so EBRPSS still has the districts.

If the legislature makes the district a thing, then it is an issue. Otherwise, EBRPSS discriminating based on municipality is a problem.
Posted by RidiculousHype
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2007
10201 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:48 pm to
Broome in tMud

Freedom wins

Kip for SG mayor
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95429 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Kip for SG mayor


Kip and Lipsey pushing for some of the incorporations that were done is cited in the decision as making it clearer that St George would NOT affect BR.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14494 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:52 pm to
This is the right decision and, in my opinion, a good thing for Baton Rouge, even for city dwellers like myself, in that it will staunch the out-migration to surrounding parishes.

That said:

quote:

LSURussian, Damone, et. al - SUCK IT


quote:

Hes a simp cuck dumbass frick


FFS, have some class.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422465 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:53 pm to
Isn't the next fight over the areas BR incorporated post-vote ?
Posted by tagatose
South Carolina
Member since Oct 2005
2008 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:53 pm to
LSURussion is a tool
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95429 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:54 pm to
Pretty sure state law on that one is clear… no incorporations on areas subject to an open incorporation petition.

Meaning those incorporations were done illegally and have to be backed out
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36031 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

This is the right decision and, in my opinion, a good thing for Baton Rouge, even for city dwellers like myself, in that it will staunch the out-migration to surrounding parishes.


Well said and yes let’s take the high road.

But we can still can still call out the mayor her attorney and her city hall allies who put their little kingdom ahead of the others.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422465 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

Pretty sure state law on that one is clear… no incorporations on areas subject to an open incorporation petition.

Meaning those incorporations were done illegally and have to be backed out


I'll catch you in 2028 when the LASC rules
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14494 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Nothing yet.

St George schools aren’t a thing yet so EBRPSS still has the districts.

If the legislature makes the district a thing, then it is an issue. Otherwise, EBRPSS discriminating based on municipality is a problem.


It is possible for EBR schools to negotiate a deal so that St. George kids could use the magnet system (particularly high schools) but both parties (EBR schools and any future StJ schools) would have to agree.

It's probably a good idea for the short to medium term, but in the long term, I think StG would want to use their own schools.

Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram