Started By
Message

re: Southern Baptist ban on women pastors fails in historic vote

Posted on 6/15/24 at 3:10 pm to
Posted by ned nederlander
Member since Dec 2012
5577 posts
Posted on 6/15/24 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

It's interesting only Christianity seems to have been ripped to shreds by those who want to be "spiritual" but basically do whatever the hell they want, anyway.


Blame Christians. 98% of Christians observe their two biggest holidays in a way largely devoid of god. Both Easter and Christmas are more about games for children and marketing than the birth, death and resurrection of Christ.

Naturally everyone on here falls in the 2%.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
80221 posts
Posted on 6/15/24 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Those Arabs sure have been dominating and living high on the hog for hundreds of years!


For centuries, Christian men pushed them back.

Now they are taking advantage of a feminized west and making gains again.
Posted by JiminyCricket
Member since Jun 2017
6018 posts
Posted on 6/15/24 at 3:19 pm to
I mean, isn’t worship a matter of our hearts and we worship God in many more ways than just music? Don’t we worship in the way we work, the way we treat others, the way we view our money, the way we view Christ’s authority, our repentance and admitting of our sin, etc?

I agree if we view worship as something to honor ourselves over God, that’s not a good thing. I just don’t see anything wrong with someone singing a contemporary worship song if that’s one of the ways they choose to worship God. It’s about their hearts.
This post was edited on 6/15/24 at 3:22 pm
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
89303 posts
Posted on 6/15/24 at 3:33 pm to
Scripture and church history are so clear on this that to propose that women should be pastors is to willfully reject God and His design for His church.

1 Timothy 3 is one Scriptural basis for male-only pastors. Notice the specificity of men as church overseers and the use of male pronouns:

It is a trustworthy statement: if any man aspires to the office of overseer, it is a fine work he desires to do. 2 An overseer, then, must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, 3 not addicted to wine or pugnacious, but gentle, peaceable, free from the love of money. 4 He must be one who manages his own household well, keeping his children under control with all dignity 5 (but if a man does not know how to manage his own household, how will he take care of the church of God?), 6 and not a new convert, so that he will not become conceited and fall into the condemnation incurred by the devil. 7 And he must have a good reputation with those outside the church, so that he will not fall into reproach and the snare of the devil. (1 Timothy 3:1-7 [Open in Logos Bible Software (if available)] ).

The Bible is perhaps even more clear in the previous chapter:

I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet. 13 For it was Adam who was first created, and then Eve. 14 And it was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression. (1 Timothy 2:12-14 [Open in Logos Bible Software (if available)] ).
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
10303 posts
Posted on 6/15/24 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

That is another fallacy, argument from authority. By that logic, Jesus should’ve just taken the Pharisees word for it when they gave their interpretation of scripture. They were educated and smarter than the disciples. What gave the disciples the right to question the interpretation of wise and smarter men?


When did the Disciples ever debate the Pharisees while Jesus was still physically with them???

quote:

You didn’t correct anything, you provided your opinion. You’ve arrogantly stated how you’ve “corrected” me multiple times but you haven’t yet.


You have been corrected multiple times by multiple posters. Sorry that you dont believe the words of Paul matter...but they do. The woe is me, youre being mean to me thing is very effiminate. As long as you keep steadfast denying scripture as written, I will keep being harsh to you. I dont care
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
45846 posts
Posted on 6/15/24 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

I mean, isn’t worship a matter of our hearts and we worship God in many more ways than just music? Don’t we worship in the way we work, the way we treat others, the way we view our money, the way we view Christ’s authority, our repentance and admitting of our sin, etc?
In a sense, yes, in that we are to offer our entire bodies as living sacrifices to God by seeking His glory in all that we do, however God has ordained His own worship to be set apart and different from simply living our lives.

He has set aside a day of the week for His people to gather together. This people is to sing His praises, join in prayer, and meet for the preaching of the Word as well as to receive the sacraments of the Lord's Supper and Baptism. This people are to submit themselves to the governance of the Church through the elders and to submit to one another through service.

Christ set apart a Church to Himself to be governed and regulated with everything done in good order, especially His own worship. The New Testament epistles in particular were not written to a bunch of individuals who were seeking to worship God however they wanted, but were written to congregations (the church in Rome, in Philippi, in Ephesus, etc.) with instructions on how to be the Church of Christ together as one body and one bride.

quote:

I agree if we view worship as something to honor ourselves over God, that’s not a good thing. I just don’t see anything wrong with someone singing a contemporary worship song if that’s one of the ways they choose to worship God. It’s about their hearts.
God does care about His worship. The 1st and 2nd commandments (especially the 2nd) are entirely about how God is to be worshipped. Many were destroyed due to the golden calf incident where they worshipped God through the calf. God rejected Saul's non-prescribed sacrifice and said that it was better to obey than merely to sacrifice. Nadab and Abihu were both destroyed for offering false worship. I could even mention Cain, since his sacrifice was bloodless while Abel's was bloody, but that might be a stretch too far for this particular issue simply because Abel's sacrifice was also done by faith while Cain's was not.

The entire form of worship in the Old Testament was ordered and regulated, from the type of materials that the tabernacle and temple were to be made out of to even the priests' garments. The types of animals to be offered and in what ways were closely regulated, and it wasn't merely to be a burden on the people to point them to the once-for-all-time sacrifice of Christ on the cross. This is carried over in the New Testament with Paul in particular giving several commands to the churches on how to worship orderly and correctly. The NT authors do not describe the worship of God as being open to the desires of man. God is holy and He prescribes His own worship.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
28683 posts
Posted on 6/15/24 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Is that contextual or is that an "all time" command?

Does that mean women should also not sing in worship, serve in kids ministry, have their heads covered in service as well?


You should actually try reading the Bible sometime.

From I Timothy ch. 2:

"12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.

There you go. Says nothing about singing or teaching kids.

And the reason given being that Eve led Adam into an pretty much answers your "all time" command question.
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3394 posts
Posted on 6/15/24 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

When did the Disciples ever debate the Pharisees while Jesus was still physically with them???

When did Jesus ever debate the Pharisees? Trick question. Jesus never existed. The gospel of Mark is just fan fiction - a masterpiece of a parable whereby a highly educated Greek composer turned the celestial Jesus of Paul into a story of a flesh and blood person on earth healing the blind and sick and walking on water.

“Mark” (whoever that really was we will never know) even ingeniously gives a clue that his whole composition is a parable in chapter 4:
quote:

10And when he was alone, those around him with the twelve asked him about the parables. 11And he said to them, “To you has been given the secret of the kingdom of God, but for those outside everything is in parables, 12so that “‘they may indeed see but not perceive, and may indeed hear but not understand, lest they should turn and be forgiven.’” 13And he said to them, “Do you not understand this parable? How then will you understand all the parables?


The gospel of Mark was not and was not intended to be a historical account. It’s not history. It’s written in a literary ring architecture just like Homer’s Odyssey. It’s a fictional narrative - a story. The original ending to “Mark” was the two women running away from the empty tomb and told no one, for they were afraid. They told no one.

It then began to be copied and spread and some people actually started believing all that really happened in real life on planet earth. Others like “Matthew” didn’t like some of the anti-Torah messaging and they didn’t like how Jesus didn’t have a father and wasn’t born and they definitely didn’t like the ending where the women told no one. Then the fan fiction really ratcheted up with “Matthew” and “Luke” revising and redacting their own versions of Mark.

At that point, there were still Christians who knew the original teachings of Paul and knew that all those gospels were fan fiction. They knew Jesus was a celestial archangel who was killed in heaven by the other gods (“archons” in Greek, often translated as “rulers” or “powers and principalities” in English). They knew Pontius Pilate didn’t sentence Jesus to crucifiction.

1 Corinthians 2:
quote:

6Yet among the mature we do impart wisdom, although it is not a wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are doomed to pass away. 7But we impart a secret and hidden wisdom of God, which God decreed before the ages for our glory. 8None of the rulers of this age understood this, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.


Paul isn’t talking about kings or governors on earth.

Ephesians 6:12
quote:

12For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.


Those Christians that were disciples of Paul knew the gospels were fan fiction, but we don’t get to see what they wrote about. All we have are the writings of the side that “won” - the side that was tricked into believing a real flesh and blood Jesus had existed on earth. We have the writings of those Christians talking shite about the Christians of the faith and revelation of Paul, who denied Jesus was ever a flesh and blood person on earth.

1 John 2:
quote:

18Children, it is the last hour, and as you have heard that antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have come. Therefore we know that it is the last hour. 19They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us. But they went out, that it might become plain that they all are not of us.


The writer of 1 John is calling rival Christian sects antichrists. Any Christian who didn’t agree with their theology was an antichrist. Any Christian who did not believe a flesh and blood Jesus healed the dying (or dead) daughter of Jairus and toured Galilee was to not be believed and was to be shunned .
quote:

1Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world. 2By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, 3and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God.


2 John 1:
quote:

7For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not confess the coming of Jesus Christ in the flesh. Such a one is the deceiver and the antichrist.


Ever wonder why Paul doesn’t write about Mary at all? Paul never ever mentions Jesus interacting with any human on earth until after his death and resurrection. Paul never mentions Jesus healing the sick or feeding 5000 people (or 4000 people ). Now you know.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
42183 posts
Posted on 6/15/24 at 10:40 pm to
Truth be told, not only should women not be allowed to be preachers ... they should have never been granted the Right to Vote.
Posted by First Sergeant1
Enterprise, Alabama
Member since Dec 2018
917 posts
Posted on 6/15/24 at 10:41 pm to
Squirrelmeister is the biggest idiot on here….absolutely foolish.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
45846 posts
Posted on 6/15/24 at 11:52 pm to
quote:

Squirrelmeister is the biggest idiot on here….absolutely foolish.
Clearly deluded. He is a religion conspiracy theorist. Anything to blaspheme the name of Christ.
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3394 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 12:38 am to
Rather than name calling and not offering any actual rebuttal nor any supporting details, consider making coherent logical arguments in the future, if you want to be persuasive.

Research what I stated. Look how the authors of 1 John and 2 John are describing Christians as deceivers - ones who have different views than them. What they describe as “antichrists” are Christians. That is clear. They are antichrists because they deny Jesus came to earth in the flesh. Notice “John” doesn’t say they deny Jesus was crucified or was raised from the dead. Paul was very clear about that and that’s what they believed. But Paul never believed or wrote about an earthly Jesus. That’s what those Christians denied (earthly Jesus gospel accounts) and that’s what “John” was writing about.
Posted by ZIGG
Member since Dec 2016
11874 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 1:10 am to
those two slob women "protesting" in the OP aren't authentic and do no represent Baptist, nor Christian women.
This post was edited on 6/16/24 at 3:57 am
Posted by Stonehenge
Wakulla Springs
Member since Dec 2014
2605 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 1:55 am to
In Alabama, the Baptist Church isn’t a religious organization, but a political organization.
Posted by Neutral Underground
Member since Mar 2024
2752 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 2:18 am to
Its a mistake to allow Women to be preachers. I would rather see the Catholic church allow priests to become married and have children. It would set a good example for the flock. I am not sure what the downside would be.
This post was edited on 6/16/24 at 11:25 am
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62486 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 4:47 am to
quote:

Squirrelmeister is the biggest idiot on here….absolutely foolish.


He actually provides useful information about the actual history of Christianity/the Bible/religion. It’s just offensive to you, so you lash out.
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
10303 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 8:38 am to
quote:

He actually provides useful information about the actual history of Christianity/the Bible/religion. It’s just offensive to you, so you lash out.


So you actually believe the Gospels are fake?
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
45846 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 9:06 am to
quote:

He actually provides useful information about the actual history of Christianity/the Bible/religion. It’s just offensive to you, so you lash out.
Except he doesn’t. He provides half truths and whole lies. He provides speculation based on things taken out of context and ignores recorded history.

Many have taken him to task on his purported “facts”. He just moves on to more lies that are provided in rapid succession so that others don’t or aren’t able to take the time to respond to every single allegation. When he is refuted, he moves on to other things and then comes back to the refuted lies again later on when people have forgotten about it, or in another thread with a different audience.

I’ve engaged with him for a long time now. He is a liar.
Posted by Gideon Swashbuckler
Member since Sep 2019
8845 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:10 am to
The New Testament is a select chronicling of Jesus's life, the Revelation, and a collection of letters that correct the early churches and clarify the teachings of Christ.

It is NOT a gift presented to the world by the Roman Catholic Church.

Christianity is the belief and following of Christ. It isn't dogma or ecclesiastical magisterium or liturgy. It isn't Transubstantiation or Christmas or even Easter.
It is living daily like Christ and for Christ. Not for the Vice God in Rome. Not Mary. Not Peter. Not Calvin. Jesus.
This post was edited on 6/16/24 at 11:11 am
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3394 posts
Posted on 6/17/24 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

I’ve engaged with him for a long time now. He is a liar.

You suffer cognitive dissonance and cherry-pick Bible verses to support your dogma while ignoring scientific facts. In many cases you reject Biblical cosmology as you reject the flat earth even though the Bible is clear. You still have not answered me to explain how many dinosaurs and of which “kinds” were on Noah’s ark.

Every single thing I post is in line with actual PHd biblical and historical scholarly consensus, except the Jesus mythicism which most scholars secretly know to be true but the majority hasn’t admitted to yet. Jesus mythicism is scholarly but not consensus yet - give it another 15-20 years and they will admit Jesus is a nonexistent fantasy akin to Adam, Abraham, Jacob, Moses, David, Solomon, Isaiah, and the rest.

Shame on you for calling me a liar. You are demented as bad as the potato brain in the White House.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram