- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sotomayor Warns "No One Is Safe" After Birthright Citizenship Ruling
Posted on 6/27/25 at 1:44 pm to HubbaBubba
Posted on 6/27/25 at 1:44 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
a different administration may try to seize firearms from lawabiding citizens
That might result in the gun grabbers getting shot in the face.
And folks ordering a bunch of 1" sheet metal for their doziers.
0
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:02 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
I can smell Kagen through the photo.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:10 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
Good. Next dim admin blanket ban all guns. Let’s get this party started.
Fearmongering. This EO would be challenged by the biggest biggest Class Action Lawsuit in history. This EO would do absolutly nothing to gun ownership in the US.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 3:04 pm to HubbaBubba
Safe from what, bitch? Crime? Mutilation of children? Illegal immigration? Liberal corruption? Drugged out zombies taking over our cities? Racial discrimination? Runaway tax burden and entitlement society? Rigged elections?
Safe from what, bitch?
Safe from what, bitch?
Posted on 6/27/25 at 3:07 pm to HubbaBubba
The SCOTUS should not be taking the position of activism. Not a good position to be taken by a current SC justice.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 3:10 pm to HubbaBubba
This is laughable. The party that has been trying to infringe on the 1st Amendment and the 2nd Amendment for years make this argument? If she had her way they would allow the government to censor the press and ban any firearms that aren’t musket loaders.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 3:18 pm to HubbaBubba
Posted on 6/27/25 at 3:59 pm to HubbaBubba
A leftist loon fearmongering and lying, I'm shocked!
Posted on 6/27/25 at 4:09 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
What a time to be alive.
Emotional reasoning is the future!
Men have abdicated their responsibility to protect this Nation.
Duuude! I can't unsee these ugly arse leftists women. Please don't.
This post was edited on 6/27/25 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 6/27/25 at 4:12 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
“No right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates,” Sotomayor’s dissent read. “Today, the threat is to birthright citizenship. Tomorrow, a different administration may try to seize firearms from lawabiding citizens or prevent people of certain faiths from gathering to worship.”
Hey Sodie, birthright citizenship was intended for the children of freed slaves and in modern times for those who entered the US legally with the intentions of becoming US citizens.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 4:21 pm to Vood
quote:
Fearmongering. This EO would be challenged by the biggest biggest Class Action Lawsuit in history. This EO would do absolutly nothing to gun ownership in the US.
Yes but would be enforced while you try to certify that class and move it through a much more stringent procedure....
Posted on 6/27/25 at 4:27 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
quote:
Fearmongering. This EO would be challenged by the biggest biggest Class Action Lawsuit in history. This EO would do absolutly nothing to gun ownership in the US.
Yes but would be enforced while you try to certify that class and move it through a much more stringent procedure....
Yes, and just think would wonders that would do for the electoral prospects of Democrats for years to come.
I love how people postulating all these wacky scenarios pretend there are no such thing as political consequences.
Funny, how it's often the same people who have been howling Muh Democracy for some time now.
Idiots
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:11 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
birthright citizenship was intended for the children of freed slaves and in modern times for those who entered the US legally with the intentions of becoming US citizens.
Yes, and when the left refers to the 1898 SC test case, where Wong Kim Ark was granted citizenship, they always leave out the critical details:
From AI:
quote:
Wong Kim Ark's parents were Chinese citizens who were legally residing in the United States at the time of his birth. They were described as having a "permanent domicile and residence in the United States" and were engaged in carrying on business.
So no lefties, you can't come here illegally or temporarily, squirt out a kid, and that kid is granted all the benefits of US citizenship. It's common sense.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:20 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
Tomorrow, a different administration may try to seize firearms from lawabiding citizens
Go ahead, skin that smokewagon and see what happens.
Posted on 6/28/25 at 1:57 am to HubbaBubba
Direct great great great etc grandson of John Alden of the Mayflower so pretty sure I am ok. (Lol)
Posted on 6/28/25 at 7:56 am to idlewatcher
Can't seize what I lost in that unfortunate boat accident a few miles offshore.
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:02 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
different administration may try to seize firearms from lawabiding citizens or prevent people of certain faiths from gathering to worship.”
They try both of these constantly. What does she mean, “might try”?
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:04 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
Tomorrow, a different administration may try to seize firearms from lawabiding citizens
LOL. Good luck with that.
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:10 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
prevent people of certain faiths from gathering to worship.”
If those faith gatherings include planning for the downfall of the western world, perhaps we should prevent them.
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:12 am to HubbaBubba
She also said we needed to keep schools closed because 100k children died from covid.
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News