- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Something I notice when I watch stories about voter fraud
Posted on 5/14/21 at 7:35 am
Posted on 5/14/21 at 7:35 am
They always say there is no evidence of “widespread’ voter fraud. In every single report they use that word…….widespread.
Who defines ‘widespread?’
Anything under 10 million fraudulent votes is not considered ‘widespread?’ What’s the number?
Can someone define this word for me so I can continue onward with my daily life?
Who defines ‘widespread?’
Anything under 10 million fraudulent votes is not considered ‘widespread?’ What’s the number?
Can someone define this word for me so I can continue onward with my daily life?
This post was edited on 5/14/21 at 7:36 am
Posted on 5/14/21 at 7:36 am to Geekboy
Why does it have to be widespread anyway?
Every vote counts
Every vote counts
Posted on 5/14/21 at 7:37 am to Nado Jenkins83
First they said there was no voter fraud. Then they inserted "widespread."
Posted on 5/14/21 at 7:42 am to Geekboy
quote:
They always say there is no evidence of “widespread’ voter fraud. In every single report they use that word…….widespread.
Who defines ‘widespread?’
It's an admission the system isn't perfect
but they emphasize "not widespread"...to make you think it isn't enough fraud to change the outcome of the election.
thank you for noticing this also..
it's more media manipulation...of the sheep
the fact is,half the country is going to assume it's widespread until proven it isn't...
why?
Because the Democrats blocked border wall construction..that's a red flag
but far worse, they impeached Trump Twice or silly allegations...
They wanted his tax records
they wanted his attorney's to "turn on him"..so they send the FBI in to raid at 6am with CNN filming it
They investigated Trump for 22 months for Russia Collusion...literally went looking for a crime when there was no evidence of one. Zero!
all these events point to the reality that Democrats are playing for keeps for power over America
short of assassinating Trump, they physically removed him via a little hacking (switch votes) and a little ballot harvesting in key states
and boom
Biden holds all the records for most votes in history...all the while not campaigning for the job
extraordinary
but we're to believe "no, voters just hated Trump that much"
Posted on 5/14/21 at 7:45 am to Geekboy
So the Nazi’s could have used the ‘widespread’ defense at the Nuremberg trials. There was no ‘widespread’ extermination of Jews at the Holocaust.
We do need an approximate number to describe ‘widespread’ for any situation that is being evaluated.
We do need an approximate number to describe ‘widespread’ for any situation that is being evaluated.
Posted on 5/14/21 at 7:45 am to Geekboy
quote:They also use the term "lies" referencing election corruption, despite ongoing investigations and aggressive obstruction to those. They can call those things "unsubstantiated". But to call them "lies" is itself, by definition, a lie.
Something I notice when I watch stories about voter fraud
They always say there is no evidence of “widespread’ voter fraud. In every single report they use that word…….widespread.
This post was edited on 5/14/21 at 7:48 am
Posted on 5/14/21 at 7:58 am to Geekboy
Doesn’t matter if it’s widespread or not. A few thousand votes determined this election. Just a few counties.
Posted on 5/14/21 at 7:59 am to SpotCheckBilly
quote:
First they said there was no voter fraud. Then they inserted "widespread."
The next is "yeah, but".
Posted on 5/14/21 at 7:59 am to Geekboy
Widespread is defined as “in six or more states”
Posted on 5/14/21 at 8:00 am to Geekboy
saying its not widespread is false....but if you dont want to use the word then fine....but the fraud doesnt have to be wide spread to change the election....a county here and there can change the entire state
Posted on 5/14/21 at 8:10 am to Geekboy
if you recall, they used to say there was no evidence on any fraud at all - with all of the same gas lighting and eye rolling you are seeing today. Then cases started to trickle in and the narrative changed to "no evidence significant fraud". More evidence rolls in and now its "widespread" fraud. The only constant is the gaslighting.
ETA: dont forget. Its been shown time and again that the media will parrot talking points directly from the party. Whatever you hear the media saying in unison is coming straight from the party.
ETA: dont forget. Its been shown time and again that the media will parrot talking points directly from the party. Whatever you hear the media saying in unison is coming straight from the party.
This post was edited on 5/14/21 at 8:12 am
Posted on 5/14/21 at 8:13 am to Geekboy
At this point it would take a rogue nsa agent to blow the whistle on dem election shenanigans. Their HAS to be recorded plotting and scheming, but these agencies are deeply involved and being a whistle-blower is practically a death sentence.
Posted on 5/14/21 at 8:13 am to Geekboy
By "widespread" they mean that it was mostly contained to five states and perhaps a dozen counties even in those states.
That means that they accept 90% as being representative of the country and those potentially suspect 10% can be ignored, ergo ===> "mostly" OK - nothing is perfect - that level of voter fraud is to be expected = "most secure election in the nation's history."
There you have the meaning of "not widespread"
except it was . . . . widespread. . . . purposeful . . . planned in advance & executed under cover of darkness . . .
That means that they accept 90% as being representative of the country and those potentially suspect 10% can be ignored, ergo ===> "mostly" OK - nothing is perfect - that level of voter fraud is to be expected = "most secure election in the nation's history."
There you have the meaning of "not widespread"
except it was . . . . widespread. . . . purposeful . . . planned in advance & executed under cover of darkness . . .
Posted on 5/14/21 at 8:21 am to ApexTiger
quote:
It's an admission the system isn't perfect
C'mon now. If that was true, they would've been working to prevent things like this from happening.
Instead, they are doing the complete opposite.
Muh suppression!
Posted on 5/14/21 at 8:23 am to Geekboy
For 4 years, and more now, Hillary has told anyone and everyone who'll listen that the 2016 election was 'stolen' by the Russians.
Even though there's literally zero evidence to support her claims.
None.
Even Jimmy Carter has claimed that Trump's victory is illegitimate, and that Russia won him the election. " Somehow ".
No one ever decried either of them as attacking democracy, or trying to shred the Constitution. But Trump...
Donald Trump got more votes than any sitting US President in history. More than Obama, GW Bush , more than Reagan.
Donald Trump got more latino and black votes, as a % of population , than any Republican in the last 40 years.
Donald Trump, Mr. "grab 'em by the meow meow " got MORE women votes in 2020 than in 2016.
Donald Trump won Florida, Ohio and Texas. Easily.
And yet magically, Joe won? Literally not possible.
Posted on 5/14/21 at 8:27 am to Geekboy
There should be ZERO voter fraud. Any fraud more than zero isn't acceptable
Posted on 5/14/21 at 8:28 am to OccamsStubble
quote:
Widespread is defined as “in six or more states”
I think they will need to change it to 7 or more: Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Nevada, Wisconsin
Posted on 5/14/21 at 8:31 am to ChineseBandit58
You don't need widespread voter fraud to change a national election. You need isolated voter fraud done in just the right 5-7 counties to change a national election.
Posted on 5/14/21 at 8:32 am to Geekboy
widespread is misinformation
fraud is fricking everywhere in the swing states
fraud is fricking everywhere in the swing states
Posted on 5/14/21 at 8:34 am to Geekboy
They play the "widespread" angle because they know the cheating was done in Phoenix, Detroit, Atlanta, Milwaukee, Philadelphia.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News