So I have a extremely stupid question for all of you.

Now that SCOTUS has made birthright citizenship legal just exactly how far back does that attach?

Say a slave was born in the US and the escaped via the Underground Railroad to Canada or some other part of the world and decided to live there. Would every descendant of that slave that is still living now have claim to US citizenship?

Let’s say an Apache Indian or some other border tribe decided to escape to Mexico or Canada instead of living on a res. Would his or descendants now have US citizenship even though the that person decided to live across the border the rest of his life and raise a family in Mexico?

Let’s say a wealthy European couple was traveling the world and the woman finds out she is pregnant on the voyage from Europe. Let’s say they first visit Mexico and then travel to the US closer to her due date so she can have the baby here. Is that baby’s modern day descendants US citizens?

What would be considered evidence. If old journals, letters, photos, or other records can be produced saying these people were born here and that persons descendants want to be US citizens would we have to let them? That could get expensive and time consuming adding to the burden of an already overburdened and underfunded immigration court system. The left could end up using this as a tactic to make the government spend time, money, and other resources on these claims to slow down immigration hearings and deportations. If these type cases can be heard it would be a total disaster. Even if the left just used people to make false claims like this then you can hang removing any illegals if these type cases birthright citizenship ruling can be carried back that far and the left figures out it can be used as a tactic to gum up the immigration court gears.