- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/13/23 at 7:59 am to Powerman
quote:
Someone that had nothing to do with a murder gets charged with murder and you think it's fine because it fits within the confines of the law?
Precisely this. “He should have never taken the 85 cents if he didn’t want to spend the rest of his life in prison.”
Posted on 12/13/23 at 7:59 am to oogabooga68
quote:
what a reach to try and draw ANY parallels between what is happening to Trump
It's a good analogy.
There is a jumping off point where the legal system connects events with events to create new crimes and it's limited only by the imagination.
That's actually real. And I'm not saying the felony murder rule is not a useful legal tool.
But having a conversation about putting limits and logical breaks into event sequences around that tool is a good thing.
This post was edited on 12/13/23 at 8:00 am
Posted on 12/13/23 at 7:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm quoting so that in a year or so, I have the receipts
Am I going to be committing a felony that I’m yet unaware of?
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:00 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Rent free
You do realize I'm defending Trump indirectly, right?
Or is this conversation too complicated for you to follow?
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Or is this conversation too complicated for you to follow?
This must be a rhetorical question.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You do realize I'm defending Trump indirectly, right?
Well I do.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:01 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Am I going to be committing a felony that I’m yet unaware of?
Actually I will admit I goofed. I didn't look directly at the name I was responding to and it came off as "oogabooga68" via my side eye.
That's who I thought I was quoting.
I don't think you will be melting over Trump's major felony conviction in a year or so, no, so receipts aren't necessary.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:02 am to TrueTiger
Pretty sure NC does, too.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:03 am to Powerman
quote:
Someone that had nothing to do with a murder
If the person really had nothing to do with it they shouldn't be charged under this statute. This is for people whose criminal acts led to someone's death and without those criminal acts, no death would have occurred.
What you're talking about is a statute that is mis-applied, not a faulty statute.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:05 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I still don’t think any of them should spend life in prison for their crimes against me.
If those crimes ended up causing the death of an innocent bystander, what should the penalty be?
(Hint—they aren't being charged on your behalf. They're being charged on behalf of the person whose death they caused.)
This post was edited on 12/13/23 at 8:10 am
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:06 am to 4cubbies
This article really leads me to abhor Sarah Stillman, the author.
It would be nice to have a conversation about the facts of the case without all the irrelevant life stories about childhood, family conversations, occupations, hopes and dreams.
When there are finally facts, I’m already doubting the accuracy because of all the effort to emotionally impact the reader.
I’m going to have to look for a different source.
It would be nice to have a conversation about the facts of the case without all the irrelevant life stories about childhood, family conversations, occupations, hopes and dreams.
When there are finally facts, I’m already doubting the accuracy because of all the effort to emotionally impact the reader.
I’m going to have to look for a different source.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:07 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
If the person really had nothing to do with it they shouldn't be charged under this statute. This is for people whose criminal acts led to someone's death and without those criminal acts, no death would have occurred.
That's about as practical as charging a gun manufacturer in a shooting death
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:08 am to 4cubbies
The thieves should have weighed the risks before they decided to break the law.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:10 am to Powerman
quote:
That's about as practical as charging a gun manufacturer in a shooting death
Because the gun manufacturer was engaging in illegal activity by selling the gun?
Otherwise no, those are apples and oranges.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:11 am to 4cubbies
Watch a few episodes of The First 48, and you'll get a pretty clear picture of felony murder statutes.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:11 am to Willie Stroker
quote:That's the truth. Meanwhile, relevant facts, like the exact nature of his testimony, got skimmed. That is normally not accidental.
This article really leads me to abhor Sarah Stillman, the author.
It would be nice to have a conversation about the facts of the case without all the irrelevant life stories about childhood, family conversations, occupations, hopes and dreams.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:12 am to 4cubbies
quote:
the result of a high speed police chase
So why weren’t the police charged?
My goodness you are a really dumb individual
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:13 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Because the gun manufacturer was engaging in illegal activity by selling the gun?
Otherwise no, those are apples and oranges.
The guy that was just checking doors didn't do anything to contribute to their deaths just as the fun manufacturer didn't
Posted on 12/13/23 at 8:13 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
If the person really had nothing to do with it they shouldn't be charged under this statute.
I’m really having a hard time understanding how Baxter reasonably caused the deaths of the cyclists. Do you? Or are you saying in this particular instance, it doesn’t make sense?
Popular
Back to top


0







