- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:07 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
They're about to baffle the thread..
Why didn't you respond to Foo who did this when he posted
quote:
“Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image." -Genesis 9:6
?
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:08 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
While the Bible is unique in the sense that it is the only writing that is God's written and preserved revelation, it's not unique in the sense that it's interpreted like any other writing is: within its own context.
If there were no other passages that help us understand God's understanding of justice, the "plain meaning" of Genesis 9:6 could be any taking of any life. However, context of the rest of Scripture demands it to be unlawful taking of life (murder).
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why didn't you respond to Foo who did this when he posted
Because I'm juggling PT, OT, and X... I don't catch every post in perfect time.
So, now what?
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:09 pm to SallysHuman
If he survives prison. Between the sodomites, Aryan National, Gangstas and Big Bubba he may be in a world of hurt.
I’ll buy the cigarettes.
I’ll buy the cigarettes.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
Foo will make this 70 pages b4 you, you jelly? 
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:10 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
Because I'm juggling PT, OT, and X... I don't catch every post in perfect time.
So, now what?
Do you not read the thread? It came before my posts, so it always existed prior to my posts. If you responded to my posts, his already existed.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So we ignore the plain meaning of "shed blood" to avoid contradiction?
Bro, it’s the bible.
No need to throw in smile emoji’s to try to score points on interpretation.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you not read the thread? It came before my posts, so it always existed prior to my posts. If you responded to my posts, his already existed.
I chose to pick on you. Deal with it.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:13 pm to cajunangelle
That is Foo's game.
He constantly shifts between the language itself and whatever he makes up...because of the implication.
He constantly shifts between the language itself and whatever he makes up...because of the implication.
This post was edited on 6/9/26 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:There is no pivot.
That is Foo's game.
He constantly shifts between the language itself and whatever he makes up...because of the implication.
The text I quoted is speaking of murder. That understanding was challenged, so I explained my reasoning for it.
Clarification is not pivoting.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you not read the thread? It came before my posts, so it always existed prior to my posts. If you responded to my posts, his already existed.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That is Foo's game. He constantly shifts between the language itself and whatever he makes up...because of the implication.
Don't poo on Foo.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:19 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
Don't poo on Foo.
He needs to choose a lane and stick there instead of the dishonest bob and weave he relies on.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:21 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
The text I quoted is speaking of murder. T
The words you quoted do not specify murder.
You initially tried to use the text to prove a point, and when your point was shredded, you pivoted to "interpretation" instead of the text itself. This is what you do, over and over again. When someone interprets, you pivot to the text and claim that is what must be discussed. When someone points out text you use doesn't work the way you intended, you abandon the prior standard and shift to your subjective interpretation.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:If you understood Christian theology, you would know that I have remained absolutely consistent. I interpret the Bible according to the Bible.
He needs to choose a lane and stick there instead of the dishonest bob and weave he relies on.
You seem to be having a conniption because you want to read a verse apart from the larger context and then complain when someone calls you out for your poor hermeneutic.
This is why I tell you to stick to the law. You're out of your depth when it comes to Christian theology.
This post was edited on 6/9/26 at 10:26 pm
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
This is just one example of why you are an a-hole. The poster asking this question
What question?
This is what I quoted
quote:
I expected the Death Penalty.
A complete sentence. Ends with a period. No question mark. Not a question.
quote:
BTW, I have a hunch that your supposed lawyer arse is lamenting the verdict
See, now I have to correct you twice.
Making hog look ever worse
Typical and expected condescending response.
You should get some rest. Over 20 posts are likely coming from you tomorrow - pace yourself.
This post was edited on 6/9/26 at 10:30 pm
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Where did I say anything that would lead you to asking this specific question?
Don't answer me with a question. Answer me with an answer.
Does SlowFlowPro consider this justice?
And FTR, you called someone a moron for broaching the idea that Anthony should be executed for murder, i.e., justice.
The "moron" was able to answer the question.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:The context does, which is how the Bible has always intended to be read.
The words you quoted do not specify murder.
quote:I have not abandoned the standard for biblical interpretation. I have remained absolutely consistent here. I'm interpreting the Bible within the larger context which distinguishes between murder and other types of lawful killing, while you are reading the verse by itself.
You initially tried to use the text to prove a point, and when your point was shredded, you pivoted to "interpretation" instead of the text itself. This is what you do, over and over again. When someone interprets, you pivot to the text and claim that is what must be discussed. When someone points out text you use doesn't work the way you intended, you abandon the prior standard and shift to your subjective interpretation.
Page 8 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News