- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sentence Reached
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
And you recognize this because its your schtick; but you would cite the satanic Bible because satan is the god you dont believe in.
Why dont you counter foo with a holy bible quote?
Why dont you counter foo with a holy bible quote?
This post was edited on 6/9/26 at 10:40 pm
1
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:26 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
If you understood Christian theology, you would know that I have remained absolutely consistent. I interpret the Bible according to the Bible. You seem to be having a conniption because you want to read a verse apart from the larger context and then complain when someone calls you out for your poor hermeneutics. This is why I tell you to stick to the law. You're out of your depth when it comes to Christian theology.
He is going to do what you’ve accused him of doing because that’s what he does for a living.
You guys will never communicate.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:27 pm to SallysHuman
Late to the party but I don't understand the interest in the case
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:27 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
And FTR, you called someone a moron for broaching the idea that Anthony should be executed for murder, i.e., justice.
Because it was never an option.
It shows he completely ignorant both to the law and story he jumped into discuss, and he displayed that ignorance proudly.
The death penalty was as likely as the sentence being having to drink 4 gallons of unicorn piss. Would THAT be justice?
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
Hint..ask AI to look up an eye for an eye a kung foo for a sensei?
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:28 pm to AlwysATgr
He is tiresome.
It’s all so un necessary.
Serenity now.
It’s all so un necessary.
Serenity now.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:28 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
You seem to be having a conniption b
Me pointing out your intellectual dishonesty is not "having a conniption"
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:28 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
but you would cite the satanic Bible
When have I ever done this?
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
Why can’t you get along with anyone?
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He needs to choose a lane and stick there instead of the dishonest bob and weave he relies on.
Bob and weave???
Pot.. meet kettle
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
You’ve really got to chill with the emojis.
You’re not nearly as smart as you think you are.
You’re not nearly as smart as you think you are.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:31 pm to Rebel
quote:
Why can’t you get along with anyone?
I get along fine with plenty of people. I even had patience with Bunk when he was a Qtard for a period of time. Because I am benevolent and believe in forgiveness, even if it's forgiving the most retarded shite possible (like believing Q)
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:It's not intellectual dishonesty to defend one's understanding through clarifying statements. You are accusing me of pivoting when I'm explaining why I believe the verse I quoted is speaking to murder and not taking just any life, as was being argued.
Me pointing out your intellectual dishonesty is not "having a conniption"
Having seen you post many times on this board, I can't believe that you are this ignorant, so I'll have to chalk this up to you being intellectually dishonest, yourself. That's unfortunate. I thought you were a serious person, even if you have a seriously messed up worldview.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:33 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
Late to the party but I don't understand the interest in the case
Justice has been rather social the past six years (more, really).
This is the first instance with widespread notoriety that has gotten justice.
Also, it involves two teenagers.
Also, one of those kids was a Baton Rouge native... or, rather, IS a BR native- he's still living.
That square it for you?
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:33 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
It's not intellectual dishonesty to defend one's understanding through clarifying statements. You are accusing me of pivoting when I'm explaining why I believe the verse I quoted is speaking to murder and not taking just any life, as was being argued.
And you dismiss anyone else being able to subjectively interpret when it proves you wrong, as you then pivot to the text. That's the dishonesty. You can't decide if you're relying on the text or your interpretation, and you shift the standards when others prove you wrong.
*ETA: none of those words has any reference to any exchange you've had with me. This is me observing how you interact with others.
This post was edited on 6/9/26 at 10:34 pm
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:35 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
This is the first instance with widespread notoriety that has gotten justice.
Trayvon Martin
Kyle Rittenhouse
Rick Chow
Mike Brown
This post was edited on 6/9/26 at 10:36 pm
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I get along fine with plenty of people.
This is why no one takes you seriously.
It makes everything else you say a house of cards.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:37 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
If you understood Christian theology,
Foo, my brother, this is why they get it wrong every single time. They do not understand the theology of God's Word.
No matter how often and loud they screech "plain meaning" and "you pivoted," they will continue to stumble.
Something about aroma in 2 Co.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:There is always interpretation. The text has meaning, which is why it was written in the first place. Just like facts aren't brute but must be interpreted, the text has meaning that must be understood.
And you dismiss anyone else being able to subjectively interpret when it proves you wrong, as you then pivot to the text. That's the dishonesty. You can't decide if you're relying on the text or your interpretation, and you shift the standards when others prove you wrong.
I'm interpreting the text according to the rest of the Bible, which I view as a single thread of revelation from the same source (God), which has a unifying message. Therefore, I don't interpret one verse on its own, but look at the larger context, just like we would for any writing we are trying to understand.
I'm not shifting standards. I quoted the text by itself with the understanding that it is talking about murder, and when challenged, I explained what was left unsaid previously: that within the larger context, it's speaking to murder.
Again, there was no pivot. Your ignorance of biblical hermeneutics is getting in your way again.
quote:Clearly you aren't very observant.
*ETA: none of those words has any reference to any exchange you've had with me. This is me observing how you interact with others.
This post was edited on 6/9/26 at 10:39 pm
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Trayvon Martin Kyle Rittenhouse Rick Chow Mike Brown
I'll take the L on that one... still, it ain't often...
Although I must point out... half your proof predates "last six years", although it does slide under "more really".
This post was edited on 6/9/26 at 10:43 pm
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News