Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS says NO to National Guard in Chicago

Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:03 pm to
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75340 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

Insurrection act incoming in 3 2 1….

This is absolutely what'll come from this. May not be today, likely not until the spring, but it's definitely in the cards.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
17563 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

The black residents who are tired of living in fear under the oppression of gang violence... are completely ignored by Democrats.


They deserve everything they're getting.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75340 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:06 pm to
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75340 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:07 pm to
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9603 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

No it’s not. Trump is using the national guard the wrong way. You can’t use the army to police regular crime.


Where besides DC is this being done outside of any actions protecting and supporting ICE while ICE is enforcing federal immigration law and outside of the guard still being under the state/governor or with agreement of state/governor?

Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9603 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:29 pm to
None of the below calls to reform the act and to limit the president’s power to use it happened even when the Dems controlled congress and the presidency under Biden’s Autopen in 2021 and 2022, but I am sure Dem judges will try to limit Trump using it anyway.

quote:

In 2020, Senator Richard Blumenthal introduced the CIVIL Act (Curtailing Insurrection and Violations of Individuals' Liberties Act) to restrict presidential authorities outlined in the Insurrection Act.[30] The legislation sought to require the President to consult with Congress before invoking the Act, restricting the President's activation of troops under the Act to fourteen days without explicit congressional authorization, requiring the President, Secretary of Defense, and Attorney General to issue a joint certification to Congress affirming a state's reluctance or inability to enforce the laws, thus justifying the use of the military, and prohibiting active duty troops from performing law enforcement actions unless authorized by law.[31]

In 2022, the Brennan Center for Justice submitted a proposal to the January 6 house committee, which investigated the January 6 United States Capitol attack, to reform the Insurrection Act with the intent of clarifying vague language and updating its contents to reflect issues of the present. Some of the language the BCJ identified as needing clarification includes the section outlining the circumstances in which the President can invoke the Act that reads "any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy" are legally accepted criteria for the law's invocation. BCJ argues that this criterion is broad and can possibly be interpreted to allow the President to invoke the Act to address any conspiracy, large or small, to include protests or petty criminal acts with active duty military forces. The BCJ also argued for Congress to rewrite the line "The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means," as the inclusion of by any other means can leave open the possibility of a force not formally under the control of the Department of Defense being authorized by the President to act under the auspices of the Insurrection Act.[32]
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 8:33 pm
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
23296 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:32 pm to
Good, let em burn the place down.....
Posted by BabyDraco1499
Hellexandria
Member since Nov 2025
956 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:47 pm to
People that don't live there will say how Trump is bad for wanting to secure the city but will ignore the countless town halls with citizens asking for Trump to step in and calling out Chicago's hand in allowing it and the fraud that they are saying they as citizens are experiencing.

Ignore what the actual citizens want, just stop Trump, right?
Posted by Leopold
Columbia
Member since Sep 2013
1903 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:43 pm to
Something tells me a rando on Twitter named `'Clandestine`' isn't an actual legal expert....
Posted by duckblind56
South of Ellick
Member since Sep 2023
4506 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:41 pm to
Okay. Let that shitehole kill, murder, shot, stab, and burn itself to the ground...even more than it already is.
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
24608 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:51 pm to
So why wouldn't Trump make a huge announcement about it, declaring Chicago off the NG list. Be very loud about how it's anything goes there. Make sure it's very widely known that the feds are completely out of there.

Then let the Chicagoans absolutely annihilate each other. Loot.. Murder.. Assault. Anything they want to do there. Just make absolutely sure everyone knows the buck stops at the Chicago PD. That's the end of the line.
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
8476 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:42 pm to
You think this is a loss for Trump?

The President tried to make Chicago safe again but democrat pols and judges blocked him. Trump isn’t the loser here; the people of Chicago are. This only helps Trump make further inroads among inner city democrats.
Posted by SlapahoeTribe
Tiger Nation
Member since Jul 2012
12451 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:53 pm to
quote:

a ruling by U.S. District Judge April Perry that had blocked the deployment of troops
Trump should just do it anyway.




There is precedent…
Posted by JackieTreehorn
Member since Sep 2013
35047 posts
Posted on 12/24/25 at 12:19 am to
Amy Barrett was the worst Supreme Court pick possible. May as well have let the democrats pick it. She’s worthless.
Posted by RollTide4547
Member since Dec 2024
3569 posts
Posted on 12/24/25 at 4:19 am to
quote:

Let that shithole burn.
Exactly. Help Red States and screw the blue ones.
Posted by CapnKangaroo
Member since Dec 2025
408 posts
Posted on 12/24/25 at 4:20 am to
quote:

The President tried to make Chicago safe again but democrat pols and judges blocked him. Trump isn’t the loser here; the people of Chicago are. This only helps Trump make further inroads among inner city democrats.


What were these troops supposed to be doing in Chicago?
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
18040 posts
Posted on 12/24/25 at 4:24 am to
This right here, Kavanaugh, in his dissent gave Trump the green light for the IA.
FAFO.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10646 posts
Posted on 12/24/25 at 9:50 am to
quote:

You’re a complete moron.


Maybe.

But I'm still a whole lot smarter than you based on the bulk of your posts here.
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
7488 posts
Posted on 12/24/25 at 11:24 am to
That is not SCOTUS role or function in this country.
Posted by Bobby OG Johnson
Member since Apr 2015
32249 posts
Posted on 12/24/25 at 12:46 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


9 post thread at the Twitter link with the rest of the dissent
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram