Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

SCOTUS ruled that brokers could be held liable for carrier accidents

Posted on 5/16/26 at 3:24 pm
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
8408 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 3:24 pm
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44255 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 3:27 pm to
As I drove back from Tejas recently, I actually wondered how many of the 18 wheelers on the road with me were driven by jihadists-in-waiting.

This post was edited on 5/16/26 at 3:35 pm
Posted by uggabugga
Maryland
Member since Aug 2024
4454 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 3:36 pm to
Tough luck for distracted pajeet truckers.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104007 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 3:36 pm to
Diesel Driving Academy fixing to eat?

Removing all these unqualified foreign truckers sure opens the door to domestic ones who can at least read signage.
Posted by Zahrim
McCamey Texas
Member since Mar 2009
8149 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

wondered how many of the 18 wheelers on the road with me were driven by jihadists-in-waiting.


prolly 20%, the rest are fairly evenly split between the haj's and the ukranians......
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23264 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Tough luck for distracted pajeet truckers.


There are a surprising number of Russians and eastern Europeans doing illegal shite in the industry.
Posted by Swazla
Member since Jul 2016
1930 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 4:00 pm to
I don’t think fright brokers have any control or influence over who is driving the carrier’s trucks.

If the reasoning is that by hiring unqualified and then less expensive drivers it drives those carriers to the brokers, th Wed n that is too much of a stretch.

Instead of twisting itself into knots just make a high standard like airline pilots have to meet v
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
143800 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

I don’t think fright brokers have any control or influence over who is driving the carrier’s trucks.


They have a great deal on who they tender loads to. If a company has a bad CSA2010 score but cheap rates, a “broker” goes with the cheapest solution.

Now they have to decide between two carriers. One with cheap rates and horrible safety record or choose a carrier with a long history or safety but may cost a few pennies more per mile.
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
10775 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 4:08 pm to

This is the way ….
Posted by Bamafig
Member since Nov 2018
6476 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

I don’t think fright brokers have any control or influence over who is driving the carrier’s trucks.



If they didn’t, and they do, they certainly will now. Brokers know, by the accepted rates, whether a carrier is sketchy or not.
Posted by subMOA
Komatipoort
Member since Jan 2010
2042 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 4:21 pm to
Brokers are the lowest scum of the earth.

I had a guy (consigned by the manufacturer) destroy a $400,000 machine because the manufacturer insisted that they needed to arrange transport. A machine that’s over 13’ tall. I begged the manufacturer. Told them I would pay a penalty just to let me haul it. My version was a 379 Long Nose with a drop side lowboy that scrapes the crown of the road when you change lanes. But nooooo, they send some kid in a plastic truck that couldn’t be bothered to read a tape and didn’t call a permit in. One overpass bridge on I-10 later and he arrived with half a machine. I was like, “uhhhh, where’s the rest of it?”

Broker had the audacity to tell him to come to me and we’d sort it out.

Once, had trucking arranged by the same manufacturer. $7500 trucking on the invoice. I asked the guy “Hey, how much did the broker give you for this load?” “$3500”

Scum. Now at least they can be responsible for something.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28533 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

But nooooo, they send some kid in a plastic truck that couldn’t be bothered to read a tape and didn’t call a permit in. One overpass bridge on I-10 later and he arrived with half a machine.



When I was 24 or so I hit a low bridge in Chicago with a trackhoe boom. No damage to bridge or hoe but the seatbelt broke my ribs. 25 mph to a dead stop is more of an impact than it sounds.
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
8421 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 4:37 pm to

I am going to have to read the opinion but my guess is there is a certain negligent entrustment argument that the court bought
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
7724 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 4:56 pm to
In short, the Court interpreted FAAAA of 1994 to preempt state laws “related to a price, route, or service” of a broker. It does not, however, preempt laws concerning “the safety regulatory authority of a State,” and "common-law duties and standards of care form part of a State’s authority to regulate safety.”
This post was edited on 5/16/26 at 4:59 pm
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
7848 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

I don’t think fright brokers have any control or influence over who is driving the carrier’s trucks.
They do by choosing a low graded carrier.

Question is if SCOTUS said that a Broker choosing by the fed grade matters or not. And what grade is acceptable liability wise. Ie...just A grade or will B and C grades be ok.

This will increase prices as Brokers will be forced to quote higher, and their customers will have to be told that the Broker will only use A and/or B graded carriers. It'll help out all around, but will cause higher prices. Which people will still complain about, even though it's safer on the road.
Posted by dalefla
Central FL
Member since Jul 2024
4121 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 6:02 pm to
Well when you think about the brokers are the contractors and the trucking companies and drivers are basically 1099s to them. USSC ruling confirms this.
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
7848 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 6:19 pm to
So what CSA score do the brokers need to confirm they got upon giving a load that protects them from lawsuits?
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85643 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 6:23 pm to
Nothing is going to protect you from a lawsuit.

You’ll just have to explain to a jury what the industry standards are and why you did your due diligence to meet the standards. This should carve out the dangerous carriers from getting substantial work.
Posted by djmed
Member since Aug 2020
4061 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 6:36 pm to
The DOT used to be strict on all trucking regs
Now we’ve got dudes that couldn’t pass the DL test at the local trooper facility
Much less an English test
What. Could. Possibly. Go. Wrong?
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
7848 posts
Posted on 5/16/26 at 6:49 pm to
That’s ridiculous. That’ll destroy the industry. If you can get sued whenever an accident happens you have to get a lawyer. Having on record that you confirmed say an A graded carrier in the Federal system should be sufficient to end the broker’s responsibility.

If the broker is responsible then a company who contracts directly will be responsible too.
This post was edited on 5/16/26 at 6:51 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram