- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Schiff & Kaine Introduce Bill To Protect Caribbean Drug Traffickers From Trump Strikes
Posted on 9/22/25 at 8:57 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 9/22/25 at 8:57 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
To dumb this down, there's good and there's evil. Schiff is from the side of evil.
0
Posted on 9/22/25 at 8:59 am to Bunk Moreland
You have to love the lack of logic and creative phrasing in pieces such as this.
Being in the Coast Guard and engaging in a shoot out with a drug boat is not a qualification for expertism in Maritime Law.
By definition, this person is a student in a Range Safety Officer course.
Voting for Trump does not add legitimacy to his opinion.
Presidents (and agents acting on the behalf of Presidents) have done this for as long as I can recall. Have you forgotten the Cold War? There's a whole genre of books and movies written by former spooks that entertain by writing about such activities.
quote:
I taught a Range Safety Officer course today and one of my students, a young man in his thirties, served with the US Coast Guard and told me of several experiences he had interdicting drug boats, which included shoot outs. He told me he was disgusted and alarmed by what Trump is doing (and he voted for Trump).
Being in the Coast Guard and engaging in a shoot out with a drug boat is not a qualification for expertism in Maritime Law.
By definition, this person is a student in a Range Safety Officer course.
Voting for Trump does not add legitimacy to his opinion.
quote:
foolishly accepting the concept that a President can kill any foreigner he wants as long as he asserts they are bad.
Presidents (and agents acting on the behalf of Presidents) have done this for as long as I can recall. Have you forgotten the Cold War? There's a whole genre of books and movies written by former spooks that entertain by writing about such activities.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:00 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Schiff & Kaine Introduce Bill To Protect Caribbean Drug Traffickers From Trump Strikes
You got to be shitting me!!
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:03 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Kaine and Schiff are two of the worst people in the Senate.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:03 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Stupidity has no limits and you cannot fix it
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:04 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
They’re doubling down on stupid. America does not want this.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:04 am to Wildcat1996
Somebody on here who claimed to have done this type of work recently said we are only blowing up the boats after we take the guys. I think he's wrong on that.
LINK
quote:
The most recent strike, announced by Mr. Trump on social media on Friday, struck a vessel and killed three people aboard, whom the president referred to as “narcoterrorists” without offering more details. He also posted a one-minute surveillance video showing a speedboat being blown up.
LINK
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:07 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
this is from former CIA officer Larry Johnson
Not agreeing with the Administration's actions, but taking at face value the CIA on anything related to the smuggling of cocaine after they have been funnelling it and washing the money for decades should be viewed with the utmost skepticism.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:08 am to FLBooGoTigs1
quote:
Why are democrats so vested in protecting people that are not citizens here and bring death to our citizens?
They want you dead.
Crazy how we had synchronized invasions of both the USA and Europe at the same time.
It is ALMOST like it was a planned thing. Almost... but that is crazy talk. I am sure it is just a coincidence. I mean it is not like boats and planes and walking existed before WW2.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:08 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:What's your solution to cut these drug traffickers down before they hit US shores?
Bunk Moreland
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:12 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Sens. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Tim Kaine (D-Va.) introduced a resolution on Friday aimed at halting U.S. military strikes on drug trafficking operations in the Caribbean, saying the actions were launched without congressional approval.
Adam Schitt and Tim Kaine were both in Congress when Barack Hussein Soerto spent 8 years droning brown people in the middle east without congressional approval.
I'm pretty sure this would be a great time for them to sit down and STFU.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:19 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Democrats are the party of death.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:20 am to RT1941
His solution is people shouldn’t do drugs therefore since they won’t stop then we should just let them in
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:28 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Democrat resolution argues that drug trafficking does not constitute an armed attack or an imminent threat
Does it really matter if Americans are killed by a bullet or by fentanyl? The end result is the same and they’re just splitting hairs
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:29 am to FLBooGoTigs1
As Scott Jennings said
“Well, I mean, for the foreseeable future, the person who’s running the Democratic Party now is going to be running it, and that’s Donald Trump. I mean, the only thing they know how to do is be against whatever he is for, and so there is no leader of the party except for Trump. The beating heart of the Democratic Party is, ‘If Trump is for it, we’re against it,’ and you throw a little socialism on the side. That’s basically how they’re — ” Jennings said before the Democratic panelists attempted to interject.
“Well, I mean, for the foreseeable future, the person who’s running the Democratic Party now is going to be running it, and that’s Donald Trump. I mean, the only thing they know how to do is be against whatever he is for, and so there is no leader of the party except for Trump. The beating heart of the Democratic Party is, ‘If Trump is for it, we’re against it,’ and you throw a little socialism on the side. That’s basically how they’re — ” Jennings said before the Democratic panelists attempted to interject.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:32 am to Revelator
quote:
The Dems are now exclusively on any side that is anti American or evil.
dems used to be anti-communist, but over the last 40 or 50 years they have continually drifted left. Communists have always been subversive and always sided with evil ideology.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:33 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:34 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
The article title doesn't match the text. The headline calls it a bill, but the text calls it a resolution.
Clearly, no bill would pass the House and the Senate with a veto proof majority.
A resolution under the War Powers Act can also be vetoed by the President.
"A bill or joint resolution directing the President to remove U.S. forces abroad may be introduced in either chamber at any time. The Senate considers such measures under a modified version of the procedures found in the International Security Assistance and Arms Export Control Act of 1976 (ISAAECA). Upon introduction and referral, the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations must report within 10 days of "continuous session" or can be discharged by a privileged motion that is debatable for one hour. Once the committee has reported or been discharged, any Senator may make a non-debatable motion to proceed to the measure. Debate on the measure and any amendments to it is limited to 10 hours. The WPR does not provide any expedited procedures for House consideration of a bill or joint resolution withdrawing forces from hostilities. Like any bill or joint resolution, the President would have the option of vetoing the measure."
LINK
Clearly, no bill would pass the House and the Senate with a veto proof majority.
A resolution under the War Powers Act can also be vetoed by the President.
"A bill or joint resolution directing the President to remove U.S. forces abroad may be introduced in either chamber at any time. The Senate considers such measures under a modified version of the procedures found in the International Security Assistance and Arms Export Control Act of 1976 (ISAAECA). Upon introduction and referral, the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations must report within 10 days of "continuous session" or can be discharged by a privileged motion that is debatable for one hour. Once the committee has reported or been discharged, any Senator may make a non-debatable motion to proceed to the measure. Debate on the measure and any amendments to it is limited to 10 hours. The WPR does not provide any expedited procedures for House consideration of a bill or joint resolution withdrawing forces from hostilities. Like any bill or joint resolution, the President would have the option of vetoing the measure."
LINK
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:40 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
former CIA officer Larry Johnson
How dare the President mess with the CIA's cash flow.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:51 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Bunk Moreland
Pussy, I bet you didn’t loose a son to the garbage these terrorist are hauling into our nation. We loose an Airbus 320 series daily to overdoses and you side with them.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News