Started By
Message

re: Rush has figured out why the left hates Devos so much. (semi NSFW language)

Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:22 pm to
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
33813 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

this is going to "fix" the pervasive problems when the systemic issues


If gives people that could succeed in a different environment that opportunity. People that don't give a shite won't even make the effort to apply for the voucher.

Studies have shown that any program that people have to take even the slightest step to participate in, such as just filling out a form, weeds the worst of the worst out.

Also, private schools that accept vouchers are still able to have a strict discipline system so the bad kids don't make it there. It frees otherwise good kids from a cycle of shitty schools.
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
34684 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Because reform rarely comes from entrenched people who are beholden to the system.


There is a difference between not being entrenched in the system and having no idea what the system is even about.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:26 pm to
Trust me, I think Betsy DeVos is a moron. There just isn't anything there to really reform. The Department of Education is pure bloat.

When our schools don't magically devolve into the Hunger Gemes without her department, people will be forced to admit that the department does nothing.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
43795 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

But we've had charter schools in a lot of places, and I don't think much has changed.



On the contray, look at Delhi-Charter School compared to Delhi high school, Madison parish high, or any of the other rural northeast La school districts; or compare NOLA's public schools pre-katerina (traditional public schools) vs NOLA's public schools after Katerina (all charter). Delhi is a small rural town in northeast La where the majority of the student population is affected by the issues that you listed earlier and DCS scores are not perfect but they are way better than DHS scores, MPHS scores. NOLA's public schools are not great, but after they went all charter they are slowly but surely improving.

The reason(s) why not a lot has changed is that NOLA was the first and only major city to convert its public schools to charters, and for the last 8 years Pres Obama and the democrats have tried to destroy them by denying them funding.
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:31 pm to
Because she is retard and does not understand basic tenant of education.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35371 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

On the contray, look at Delhi-Charter School compared to Delhi high school, Madison parish high, or any of the other rural northeast La school districts; or compare
Well I feel like your public education in Louisiana resembles something very different than I experienced in Ohio.

So maybe it better addresses certain systemic issues, depending on the state.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
33813 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

There is a difference between not being entrenched in the system and having no idea what the system is even about.


Quite trying to Sarah-Palin this woman when you don't know anything about her.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
43795 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

Well I feel like your public education in Louisiana resembles something very different than I experienced in Ohio.

So maybe it better addresses certain systemic issues, depending on the state.


1. IIRC Devos favors giving more power back to the states on education.

2. That is the beauty of school choice, if a school system is a good school system it doesn't have to change, but if it a shite system then it will be forced to change or else parents will pull their kids out and send them to other schools.

3. The beauty of charter schools is that you can apply at the school level instead of the state or system level. If a school underperforms then that school's charter is revoked and given to someone else to run and the rest of the system or the rest of the state is not affected.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35371 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

IIRC Devos favors giving more power back to the states on education.
Which is something I don't understand. Most of the power seems to be with the states, especially the most substantive aspects.
Posted by zunic
Dallas
Member since Nov 2014
921 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Because she is retard and does not understand basic tenant of education.

Posted by Jax-Tiger
Vero Beach, FL
Member since Jan 2005
26814 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

I usually don't like Rush or his opinions


I hear people say this, but Rush's political analysis is usually very good. His schtick may be old, but he provides analysis that is excellent.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
124811 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Maybe, but some studies (Levitt from Freakonomics has a couple great ones) have shown that it's not the school, it's the parents who cared, irrespective of choice which made the difference.


It's not a shocker that that's with the data says. But what are the outliers? What are the situations where schools have outperformed the socioeconomic status of their children? Where students out performed the engagement of the parents? Can we learn anything from those outliers that we can apply to the main?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
124811 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Because she is retard and does not understand basic tenant of education.


This right here.

A thing of beauty.
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
52464 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 4:26 pm to
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
50807 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

How can Betsy DeVos fix public education when she has no professional experience as a teacher or administrator of public schools

My niece is a public school teacher. She and everyone she knows despises their public school administrators. They are ignorant and incompetent.

I have been to many public schools in atlanta to meet with administrators in my role with Apple. Every single time the administrator reserved parking spot is occupied by a Mercedes, an escalade, a BMW, or some other luxury vehicle. Every single time. Luxury car surrounded by a falling down ghetto school filled with students that can barely read and do arithmetic.

I don't think we need to follow administrators as if they are an example.

If anything, we need to blow up the corrupt, failing system.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
53582 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

I usually don't like Rush or his opinions, but he is absolutely correct. If minorities realize that it is the left and the left's ideas that are the reason for the poor education systems that do not let them escape poverty, crime, drugs etc then the left is screwed.




You can research socialism/communism and they know when an ideology can get control of the educational system and the media you control a lot of the populace...., this is where the Progs/Libs have excelled!
Posted by fouldeliverer
Lannisport
Member since Nov 2008
13538 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 5:08 pm to
Is it because she's incompetent and only was nominated because she's a Republican fundraiser?
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
35572 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

They want no government intrusion into the reproductive rights of women and the choice as to whether a child lives or dies, but once they decide to allow the birth of the child they believe only the government should decide how it should be educated. It's crazy!


Normally I side with conservatives on a lot of issues, but on the school voucher thing, I'm more to the right than most of you. I hate the voucher program. I hate it because it gives the Federal Government a back door into dictating to religious and privates schools in ways more than just accredidation. If these schools start taking federal money, they will get addicted to federal money and if they start doing things that the Federal government does not like, they could suffer, the money could be pulled.

Oh, you are a Catholic school and you think homosexuality is a sin? Well that's hate speech and if you continue to teach that we will pull your creds and no more voucher money for you. What you won't let boys born as girls into you're all boys school....you like that money don't you?

Surprised people on this board don't see that. I don't have nearly the same problem with charter schools under the public umbrella.
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 5:11 pm
Posted by zunic
Dallas
Member since Nov 2014
921 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

Is it because she's incompetent and only was nominated because she's a Republican fundraiser?


Whaaaaaat? No way, can't be because of that!
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
40237 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 5:16 pm to
So the solution to the separate private and public systems is to spread around the federal dollars to private school?


Just how fricking stupid are you people. School choice may work in urban areas but for rural places it'll just mean less funding for their school and less oversight into the money
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram