Started By
Message

re: Rooftop footage of where shooter was shows difficult line of sight

Posted on 7/23/24 at 10:37 pm to
Posted by Dickaroos
Nunya
Member since Feb 2013
749 posts
Posted on 7/23/24 at 10:37 pm to
I’m just curious why nobody seems to realize that guy has a very thick mustache! The dead guy plastered all over the internet doesn’t have a mustache! Why are people so fricking stupid? It’s absolutely amazing how easily manipulated people are. They can’t/won’t see what is right in front of them. Wake up !
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3379 posts
Posted on 7/23/24 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

Do you think a military trained sniper missed?

I never said such a thing. Yes it was an inside job and no Crooks didn’t take the first shot that grazed Trump nor the second or third shot. Don’t presuppose it was a trained military sniper. I’m a half decent shot myself especially within 200 yards and I’ve missed head shots on animals that turned or moved their head at the last second. Maybe it was a guy disguised as a police officer firing a shot from 150 yards with open sights or a red dot or something. We can speculate, but the evidence shows Crooks didn’t fire the bullet that hit Trump’s ear.

Now the second volley of 5 shots… I’m not even sure I could pull a trigger that fast.
Posted by SaintCallistratos
Member since Jul 2024
7 posts
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:00 pm to
Agree re: position he was videoed at and where he was located when taken out don’t put him in a viable position to have gotten clear line of sight downward into crowd/Pres. Trump.

With Rep. Crane video showing 2nd floor windows where county sniper team was supposed to occupy; they would have easily seen him if they hadn’t left their positions,

Too many holes in this story.
Posted by UtahGetMeTwo
Member since Jul 2024
264 posts
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:11 pm to
I'm not buying 2 shooters theory.

That means both of them were awful shots. And if the 2nd shooter was a pro who nicked Trump in the ear, why didn't he follow up with 2nd and 3rd?

The hypothesis of there being intentional disregard by SS to allow the virgin to get shots off however makes perfect sense and is backed up by OVERWHELMING amount of facts. Enough to charge certain people criminally in Biden's SS. They knew about the virgin, knew where he was climbing, knew he was on the roof and let him shoot hoping he gets DJT.

Sadly for them little fcker was so stressed he could only graze Don.
This post was edited on 7/23/24 at 11:13 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
176219 posts
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:12 pm to
quote:

I'm not buying 2 shooters theory.


Good. Shooter was here.

It is my theory. I just put other things together. These screen shots off my video I’ve been posting. These pics are screenshots right after the first 3 shots. Convenient video stoppage right before next shots fired, it panned to 3rd window right after final shot



Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
20349 posts
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:14 pm to
quote:

We can speculate, but the evidence shows Crooks didn’t fire the bullet that hit Trump’s ear.


Can you summarize this evidence that shows this?

quote:

I’m a half decent shot myself especially within 200 yards and I’ve missed head shots on animals that turned or moved their head at the last second.


You may be a fine shot. But I would question if you are as good as a trained sniper. They are required to take, and expected to make, shots out to 800-1000 yards and train to do it. If they can’t make them they won’t graduate. A sub 200 yard shot is a gimme to them.

Also, as your post illustrates, head shots on big game are unethical. Especially on deer, which are always bobbing and weaving their heads. Many a doe has had her jaw blown off by a head shot, only to run off and slowly starve to death. Having missed head shots and knowing how much they move their heads I sure hope you don’t still take them.
Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
20349 posts
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:23 pm to
My theory is that you were the second gunman. There is no way to know the other shooter was in that window. The only proof is the window is open. Yet you are certain that is where the other shooter was. The only way you could know that is if you are the second shooter.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
176219 posts
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

other shooter



The shooter
Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
20349 posts
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:30 pm to
Is this your confession?
Posted by LaMigra
Member since Nov 2022
2714 posts
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:34 pm to
Also had the shooter been shot by the sniper from the SS his head would have exploded from the bullet! Another lie told by the government (the picture)
That guy was shot from behind with a semi auto hand gun in my pinion or small caliber rifle, not with a SS snipper rifle
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
19550 posts
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

Speculation and conjecture. Exactly what we're all doing right now and exactly the way the shadow gov wants it.

This whole thing is ridiculous. Kimberly Cheatle couldn’t even be bothered to bring a timeline of events to the hearing. She couldn’t confirm anything about anything. She was playing word games lying the entire time about small details.
This post was edited on 7/23/24 at 11:37 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
176219 posts
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:41 pm to
quote:

Also had the shooter been shot by the sniper from the SS his head would have exploded from the bullet! Another lie told by the government (the picture) That guy was shot from behind with a semi auto hand gun in my pinion or small caliber rifle, not with a SS snipper rifle
if you’re talking about the guy on roof, you’re wrong. He was sniped 100%
Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
20349 posts
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:49 pm to
quote:

Also had the shooter been shot by the sniper from the SS his head would have exploded from the bullet!


A .308 doesn’t make heads explode. And why would they execute him at close range with a pistol when a) they already had a sniper in position who could shoot him, and b) this executioner would have been in the line of fire if the sniper or one of the locals did start firing at Crooks?
Posted by Victor R Franko
Member since Dec 2021
2247 posts
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:56 pm to
quote:

Chad504boy

I'm thinking along similar lines as you. Second shooter inside building, shooting the first 3 shots through open window. Counter sniper can't determine where these shots are coming from. Crooks wakes up and fires shots 4-8, drawing attention to himself, but still trying to takeout Trump. Counter sniper now sees Crooks and takes him out with shot 9.

This pieces many of the videos together. I propose that Crooks weapon was stashed in roof gutter long before event and waiting for him where he climbed onto the roof. I suppose inside shooter had rifle planted somewhere inside building, snuggled into building on day event, or carried in by person wearing law uniform as if in defense of President. Uniformed person I believe is best guess for second shooter as it allows weapon in and out of building on demand.

I've mentioned in other threads about 3d scanning the site and gaming out the videos and possibilities. I'd expect something like this from one of these investigation committees.
This post was edited on 7/23/24 at 11:57 pm
Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
9012 posts
Posted on 7/24/24 at 4:53 am to
quote:

Also had the shooter been shot by the sniper from the SS his head would have exploded from the bullet! Another lie told by the government (the picture)
That guy was shot from behind with a semi auto hand gun in my pinion or small caliber rifle, not with a SS snipper rifle
Best Regards,

Nevr FiredAWeapon, DDS


Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
9012 posts
Posted on 7/24/24 at 4:56 am to
Your Open Window and Close Window pic is a really, really bad Photoshop on the top part of the Close Window.
Posted by IT_Dawg
Georgia
Member since Oct 2012
26339 posts
Posted on 7/24/24 at 5:17 am to
quote:

Total inside job. There is no other acceptable explanation why the SS had eyes on this guy and let him shoot first.


You’re giving the USSS waaaay too much credit. They are way too incompetent to pull something like that off and certainly not competent enough to pull it off without leaking it
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
14442 posts
Posted on 7/24/24 at 5:42 am to
We have no idea what the context of that image is.
Crooks could have still been crawling into position and took time to take a practice shooting position before the assassination attempt.
There is a ton that being covered up and I have no doubt that the SS and the FBI allowed the assassination attempt but I do not find the logic in the OP compelling.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
21472 posts
Posted on 7/24/24 at 6:57 am to
Video didn't show any "line of sight".
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3379 posts
Posted on 7/24/24 at 7:04 am to
quote:

Can you summarize this evidence that shows this?

First volley of three shots was not from the same weapon as the second volley of 5 shots. Confirmed by multiple microphones by amplitude and frequency of the sound, and lack of echoes on first volley but many echoes on second volley. First volley was muffled to adjacent microphones and with no echoes places it inside the building. Second volley with echoes places it outside where the sound can bounce around.

Where Crooks was on the building according to video evidence, he hadn’t crested the roof to even get a shot on Trump yet. From his vantage point he have just seen the sky. More video evidence confirmed it because it showed Crooks in the middle of the roof (not at the crest) plus when the first shot rang out, Crooks arm and shoulder didn’t move (no recoil, no shot).

quote:

But I would question if you are as good as a trained sniper. They are required to take, and expected to make, shots out to 800-1000 yards and train to do it. If they can’t make them they won’t graduate. A sub 200 yard shot is a gimme to them.

What if one of those trained snipers had to run to a window 200 yards from the target and fire not from a bolt action rifle with a fancy scope and a spotter but from a police AR-15 with a red dot and hit a guy who moved his head?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram