- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rooftop footage of where shooter was shows difficult line of sight
Posted on 7/23/24 at 10:37 pm to MrLSU
Posted on 7/23/24 at 10:37 pm to MrLSU
I’m just curious why nobody seems to realize that guy has a very thick mustache! The dead guy plastered all over the internet doesn’t have a mustache! Why are people so fricking stupid? It’s absolutely amazing how easily manipulated people are. They can’t/won’t see what is right in front of them. Wake up !
Posted on 7/23/24 at 10:55 pm to DMAN1968
quote:
Do you think a military trained sniper missed?
I never said such a thing. Yes it was an inside job and no Crooks didn’t take the first shot that grazed Trump nor the second or third shot. Don’t presuppose it was a trained military sniper. I’m a half decent shot myself especially within 200 yards and I’ve missed head shots on animals that turned or moved their head at the last second. Maybe it was a guy disguised as a police officer firing a shot from 150 yards with open sights or a red dot or something. We can speculate, but the evidence shows Crooks didn’t fire the bullet that hit Trump’s ear.
Now the second volley of 5 shots… I’m not even sure I could pull a trigger that fast.
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:00 pm to MrLSU
Agree re: position he was videoed at and where he was located when taken out don’t put him in a viable position to have gotten clear line of sight downward into crowd/Pres. Trump.
With Rep. Crane video showing 2nd floor windows where county sniper team was supposed to occupy; they would have easily seen him if they hadn’t left their positions,
Too many holes in this story.
With Rep. Crane video showing 2nd floor windows where county sniper team was supposed to occupy; they would have easily seen him if they hadn’t left their positions,
Too many holes in this story.
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:11 pm to MrLSU
I'm not buying 2 shooters theory.
That means both of them were awful shots. And if the 2nd shooter was a pro who nicked Trump in the ear, why didn't he follow up with 2nd and 3rd?
The hypothesis of there being intentional disregard by SS to allow the virgin to get shots off however makes perfect sense and is backed up by OVERWHELMING amount of facts. Enough to charge certain people criminally in Biden's SS. They knew about the virgin, knew where he was climbing, knew he was on the roof and let him shoot hoping he gets DJT.
Sadly for them little fcker was so stressed he could only graze Don.
That means both of them were awful shots. And if the 2nd shooter was a pro who nicked Trump in the ear, why didn't he follow up with 2nd and 3rd?
The hypothesis of there being intentional disregard by SS to allow the virgin to get shots off however makes perfect sense and is backed up by OVERWHELMING amount of facts. Enough to charge certain people criminally in Biden's SS. They knew about the virgin, knew where he was climbing, knew he was on the roof and let him shoot hoping he gets DJT.
Sadly for them little fcker was so stressed he could only graze Don.
This post was edited on 7/23/24 at 11:13 pm
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:12 pm to UtahGetMeTwo
quote:
I'm not buying 2 shooters theory.
Good. Shooter was here.
It is my theory. I just put other things together. These screen shots off my video I’ve been posting. These pics are screenshots right after the first 3 shots. Convenient video stoppage right before next shots fired, it panned to 3rd window right after final shot

Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:14 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:
We can speculate, but the evidence shows Crooks didn’t fire the bullet that hit Trump’s ear.
Can you summarize this evidence that shows this?
quote:
I’m a half decent shot myself especially within 200 yards and I’ve missed head shots on animals that turned or moved their head at the last second.
You may be a fine shot. But I would question if you are as good as a trained sniper. They are required to take, and expected to make, shots out to 800-1000 yards and train to do it. If they can’t make them they won’t graduate. A sub 200 yard shot is a gimme to them.
Also, as your post illustrates, head shots on big game are unethical. Especially on deer, which are always bobbing and weaving their heads. Many a doe has had her jaw blown off by a head shot, only to run off and slowly starve to death. Having missed head shots and knowing how much they move their heads I sure hope you don’t still take them.
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:23 pm to Chad504boy
My theory is that you were the second gunman. There is no way to know the other shooter was in that window. The only proof is the window is open. Yet you are certain that is where the other shooter was. The only way you could know that is if you are the second shooter.
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:25 pm to captdalton
quote:
other shooter
The shooter
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:30 pm to Chad504boy
Is this your confession?
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:34 pm to captdalton
Also had the shooter been shot by the sniper from the SS his head would have exploded from the bullet! Another lie told by the government (the picture)
That guy was shot from behind with a semi auto hand gun in my pinion or small caliber rifle, not with a SS snipper rifle
That guy was shot from behind with a semi auto hand gun in my pinion or small caliber rifle, not with a SS snipper rifle
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:36 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
Speculation and conjecture. Exactly what we're all doing right now and exactly the way the shadow gov wants it.
This whole thing is ridiculous. Kimberly Cheatle couldn’t even be bothered to bring a timeline of events to the hearing. She couldn’t confirm anything about anything. She was playing word games lying the entire time about small details.
This post was edited on 7/23/24 at 11:37 pm
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:41 pm to LaMigra
quote:if you’re talking about the guy on roof, you’re wrong. He was sniped 100%
Also had the shooter been shot by the sniper from the SS his head would have exploded from the bullet! Another lie told by the government (the picture) That guy was shot from behind with a semi auto hand gun in my pinion or small caliber rifle, not with a SS snipper rifle
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:49 pm to LaMigra
quote:
Also had the shooter been shot by the sniper from the SS his head would have exploded from the bullet!
A .308 doesn’t make heads explode. And why would they execute him at close range with a pistol when a) they already had a sniper in position who could shoot him, and b) this executioner would have been in the line of fire if the sniper or one of the locals did start firing at Crooks?
Posted on 7/23/24 at 11:56 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Chad504boy
I'm thinking along similar lines as you. Second shooter inside building, shooting the first 3 shots through open window. Counter sniper can't determine where these shots are coming from. Crooks wakes up and fires shots 4-8, drawing attention to himself, but still trying to takeout Trump. Counter sniper now sees Crooks and takes him out with shot 9.
This pieces many of the videos together. I propose that Crooks weapon was stashed in roof gutter long before event and waiting for him where he climbed onto the roof. I suppose inside shooter had rifle planted somewhere inside building, snuggled into building on day event, or carried in by person wearing law uniform as if in defense of President. Uniformed person I believe is best guess for second shooter as it allows weapon in and out of building on demand.
I've mentioned in other threads about 3d scanning the site and gaming out the videos and possibilities. I'd expect something like this from one of these investigation committees.
This post was edited on 7/23/24 at 11:57 pm
Posted on 7/24/24 at 4:53 am to LaMigra
quote:
Also had the shooter been shot by the sniper from the SS his head would have exploded from the bullet! Another lie told by the government (the picture)
That guy was shot from behind with a semi auto hand gun in my pinion or small caliber rifle, not with a SS snipper rifle
Best Regards,
Nevr FiredAWeapon, DDS
Posted on 7/24/24 at 4:56 am to Chad504boy
Your Open Window and Close Window pic is a really, really bad Photoshop on the top part of the Close Window.
Posted on 7/24/24 at 5:17 am to Biff Underwood
quote:
Total inside job. There is no other acceptable explanation why the SS had eyes on this guy and let him shoot first.
You’re giving the USSS waaaay too much credit. They are way too incompetent to pull something like that off and certainly not competent enough to pull it off without leaking it
Posted on 7/24/24 at 5:42 am to MrLSU
We have no idea what the context of that image is.
Crooks could have still been crawling into position and took time to take a practice shooting position before the assassination attempt.
There is a ton that being covered up and I have no doubt that the SS and the FBI allowed the assassination attempt but I do not find the logic in the OP compelling.
Crooks could have still been crawling into position and took time to take a practice shooting position before the assassination attempt.
There is a ton that being covered up and I have no doubt that the SS and the FBI allowed the assassination attempt but I do not find the logic in the OP compelling.
Posted on 7/24/24 at 6:57 am to MrLSU
Video didn't show any "line of sight".
Posted on 7/24/24 at 7:04 am to captdalton
quote:
Can you summarize this evidence that shows this?
First volley of three shots was not from the same weapon as the second volley of 5 shots. Confirmed by multiple microphones by amplitude and frequency of the sound, and lack of echoes on first volley but many echoes on second volley. First volley was muffled to adjacent microphones and with no echoes places it inside the building. Second volley with echoes places it outside where the sound can bounce around.
Where Crooks was on the building according to video evidence, he hadn’t crested the roof to even get a shot on Trump yet. From his vantage point he have just seen the sky. More video evidence confirmed it because it showed Crooks in the middle of the roof (not at the crest) plus when the first shot rang out, Crooks arm and shoulder didn’t move (no recoil, no shot).
quote:
But I would question if you are as good as a trained sniper. They are required to take, and expected to make, shots out to 800-1000 yards and train to do it. If they can’t make them they won’t graduate. A sub 200 yard shot is a gimme to them.
What if one of those trained snipers had to run to a window 200 yards from the target and fire not from a bolt action rifle with a fancy scope and a spotter but from a police AR-15 with a red dot and hit a guy who moved his head?
Popular
Back to top


0




