- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: RFK Jr.'s MAHA report cited nonexistent studies
Posted on 5/30/25 at 6:20 pm to LSUnation78
Posted on 5/30/25 at 6:20 pm to LSUnation78
quote:
Then you’re using the wrong AI.
That was true up until about month and half ago or so.
I just pulled something for a chemist yesterday and provided the citations. They pulled up each one and printed them out for reading material.
You should get with the law firm Butler Snow in Alabama and tell them what you're using considering the mess they are currently in. Or, hit up that journalist who just got fired for providing a Summer reading list of completely fictitious (as in entirely nonexistent) books in an article.
1
Posted on 5/30/25 at 6:22 pm to rds dc
We are already at the point where we can't trust our courts our media our science or our data.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 6:25 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Just goes to show what we all knew all along. RFK is not, and never was, a serious person.
Sounds neat on a Rogan podcast when nobody will fact check you in real time, but that’s dramatically different than actually writing credible policy.
He’s simply getting exposed.
Sounds neat on a Rogan podcast when nobody will fact check you in real time, but that’s dramatically different than actually writing credible policy.
He’s simply getting exposed.
This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 5/30/25 at 6:38 pm to rds dc
quote:Accurate interpretation should be upto industry experts, and it actually is. Unfortunately the MSM clouds who should be interpreted as "experts"
We are approaching a point where we cannot trust digital information because so much of it is AI-generated trash.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 6:48 pm to NC_Tigah
We went from “I do my own research” to “I make up my own research” real fast.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 6:55 pm to mwade91383
quote:Yes and no.
We went from “I do my own research” to “I make up my own research” real fast.
Those jumping to critique RFKJr are equally quick to excuse their own stupidity. We are seeing this repeatedly with the Covid BS
Posted on 5/30/25 at 7:13 pm to mwade91383
quote:His appointments at NIH and FDA say different.
Just goes to show what we all knew all along. RFK is not, and never was, a serious person.
Sounds neat on a Rogan podcast when nobody will fact check you in real time, but that’s dramatically different than actually writing credible policy.
He’s simply getting exposed.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 7:17 pm to LegendInMyMind
Well im glad you’re in good company with other stupid people then.
Bury your head in the sand, makes no difference to me.
Bury your head in the sand, makes no difference to me.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 7:17 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
error in the citation
lol. Get fricked.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 7:19 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
The White House has blamed it on “formatting” issues. LINK This paper likely has the footprints of AI all over it
A lot of the stuff out of the White House even the EOs read like AI slop.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 7:20 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
The White House blamed the inclusion and citation of nonexistent studies on “formatting issues“
Here’s a fig who can’t read his own article.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 7:46 pm to LSUTANGERINE
So what, we had a global pandemic that was used to usher in a depop shot, wreck the global economy and create the greatest transfer of wealth in history for a nonexistent virus.
This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 8:57 pm
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:02 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
f you use AI for any actual research at this point you are fricking retarded.
I used it to write a short paper yesterday but my queue was very specific. “Find an article written in the last 6 months that discusses the learning objectives below” then pasted the 4 chapters learning objectives I was searching for. All the articles returned were legit.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:03 pm to LSUTANGERINE
So, like climate change, but not as sus?
Cool.
Cool.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:06 pm to LSUTANGERINE
So the study has MORE THAN 500 citations listed and ABC scrounged up a couple with issues?
sounds like a formatting problem
sounds like a formatting problem
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:10 pm to the808bass
quote:
Here’s a fig who can’t read his own article.
You might want to check out the press briefing from the White House.
quote:
"I understand there was some formatting issues with the MAHA report that are being addressed and the report will be updated." Leavitt told reporters during her briefing.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:12 pm to LSUTANGERINE
You’re reinforcing my post. Preciate it.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:14 pm to LSUTANGERINE
How big of a win is this for you people?
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:19 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
Everyone is using ai - everyone
And I really don’t care if he has missteps as he’s saving us
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:24 pm to LSUTANGERINE
808 is a mouth breather mad as frick that he’s wrong about literally everything
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News