re: Remember the Epstein victim who died by suicide 2 months ago? Virginia Giuffre.

I am really surprised Maxwell is still alive, I imagine she will die of a heart attack soon enough

quote:

---

I am really surprised Maxwell is still alive, I imagine she will die of a heart attack soon enough

---

The lack of victims coming forward with the CT claims is the biggest issue with the CTs

The 2nd issue is what you posted. Maxwell being alive doesn't make any sense.

quote:

---

It's in the fricking link

quote:
Giuffre took the deposition for a civil lawsuit she brought against Ghislaine Maxwell

---

You still did not explain....

1. Deposition given in Maxwell case
2. Discovery/deposition in Epstein case
3. Discovery/deposition in Prince Andrew case
4. Discvoery/affidavits/deposition in Maxwell criminal case.
5. Discovery/depositions in the case against Dershowitz

Forget almost all of that, there is also the Florida Epstein case where we have most of the documents.

For God's sake, man...she placed Clinton on the island when she was being passed around and there were other girls there.

I can imagine you just not bothering to get any financial information during your handling of a divorce to not even address these issues. You really are quite pathetic,

See this article:

LINK

quote:

---

The documents also bring fresh scrutiny to Prince Andrew, a longtime friend of Epstein who said he cut ties with him in 2010. Another Doe whose name was unredacted was Johanna Sjoberg, one of Epstein's victims who previously said the prince fondled her at his Manhattan mansion.

---

Explain why these records are sealed??

Explain where is the complete investigation into at least 5 girls and Prince Andrew? Are there others? At least 2 mentioned Andrew and both are dead.

As the article states:

quote:

---

Sigrid McCawley, an attorney for Giuffre at the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner, told BI the newly unsealed documents helped explain "how Epstein operated his vast, global sex trafficking enterprise and got away with it for decades," which "resulted in unspeakable harm and devastation to the lives of countless girls and young women."

---

So.. a vast global sex trafficking enterprise that only involved epstein.. that is what our government just told us.

quote:

---

See this article:

LINK

Explain why these records are sealed??

---

Because the vast majority of the names are witnesses or victims. Did you read it?

quote:

---

The names include some powerful people tied to Epstein. But the list also includes the identities of some of his victims, household staff, and other people whose names incidentally came up in the course of a long-running court case between Virginia Roberts Giuffre and Maxwell. In court documents, these people were previously identified as John or Jane Does.

One of the Does, for example, previously identified as "J. Doe 005" in court documents, is Carolyn Andriano. Andriano testified against Maxwell at her criminal trial, describing in excruciating detail how she trafficked her to Epstein for sex beginning when she was 14 years old. She said in court that Epstein engaged in sexual activity with her more than 100 times and that he said she was "too old" for him after she turned 18.

Andriano testified using only her first name but gave her full name in an interview with the Daily Mail after the trial. The judge who ordered her name to be unsealed cited that interview as a reason to now make her name public in the earlier court documents. Andriano, a 36-year-old mother of five, died of an apparent overdose in May, The Daily Beast reported.

Another previously sealed name, "Doe 185," is Courtney Wild. She led a legal battle to invalidate Epstein's controversial 2007 plea deal with federal prosecutors and has given multiple media interviews about her experience with Epstein.

Two other Does — 63 and 64 — are Annie and Maria Farmer, two sisters who have accused Epstein of sexual abuse. Annie Farmer testified at Maxwell's trial, and both have given media interviews about their experience.

Out of the more than 170 anonymous Does whose names were scheduled to be unsealed Wednesday, two received extensions allowing them to continue fighting in court to remain anonymous.

One of them, "Doe 107," is also one of Epstein's victims, whose lawyer has argued in court filings that she should be able to keep her privacy. The identity of the other, "Doe 110," is not yet clear.

---

Also note: all of those girls only talk about abuse by Epstein.

quote:

---

And yet you only focus on the one girl and not the other victims and what about the investigation into Andrew? Where is it? Are there not "facts" and "evidence" he was involved?

---

The fact Andrew was named logically hurts the allegations about a larger conspiracy.

If "they" exist, they would have never let one out. Just like how Maxwell was allowed to live and hasn't flipped, etc.

I would not be shocked to find out there were a handful of other guys who partied with Epstein who had sex with minors. That doesn't prove a global conspiracy of blackmail or implicate anyone specifically. But, other than Andrew, we have nothing to base that on.

quote:

---

That is literally not true.... see above...

---

Where in that quote were others mentioned?

We know that Epstein and Maxwell ran a vast international network for a long period of time where they trafficked girls to be abused by Epstein and Maxwell.

quote:

---

"The public interest must still be served in learning more about the scale and scope of Epstein's racket to further the important goal of shutting down sex trafficking wherever it exists and holding more to account," she said. "The unsealing of these documents gets us closer to that goal."

---

You can see it in this quote. The unsealing of those documents only pointed more fingers at Epstein in isolation.

Also note: attorney puffery is not evidence.

You're grasping without evidence and, as I said earlier, using your ignorance of the evidence to fill that void with inaccuracies that you proclaim is the same thing as evidence. That's not how this works. That's CT "logic".

quote:

---

Do you think Epstein was deep state?

---

Most seem to think he was an Israeli asset which precludes that association.

So it's not that I don't think he's "Deep State", but the general consensus on Epstein now is that he's not "Deep State"

quote:

---

My goodness, I didn't ask the general consensus. What do you think?

Was he Mossad or CIA or something else?

---

At this point, I don't know.

A week ago I would have leaned Israeli asset.

I don't think Trump, Kash, Bongino, etc. are that compromised to make themselves look like complete retards, though.

I never bought in to the vastness of the conspiracy. I mean you had lunatics trying to link the Chief Justice John Roberts to Epstein without a shred of evidence.

quote:

---

I don't think Trump, Kash, Bongino, etc. are that compromised to make themselves look like complete retards, though.

---

Those 2 already look like complete retards. They built their brand on having inside information about Epstein and knowing there was a list from their "sources". THey are either retarded then or retarded now but def in over their head.

I don't think Acosta was lying when he said that Epstein was above his paygrade and that he was giving a sweet deal because he was intelligence.

If he's not intelligence that brings up even more questions, especially about his money

That or a small airport.