
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Refuse to swear in the socialists
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:34 am
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:34 am
The question is, do any of the R's have the requisite huevos to do this?
LINK
quote:
A little-known congressional maneuver could block members of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) from being sworn in as members of the House of Representatives next year, even if they win their elections on Tuesday.
Members-elect must swear an oath to uphold the Constitution before they can become full members of the House. At the beginning of a new Congress, that oath is typically taken en masse by all 435 members, led by the House speaker.
But an argument circulating in conservative circles posits that any member-elect can challenge another member-elect's right to be sworn in, provided they have compiled evidence that that person would not uphold their oath. That would then lead to House-wide deliberations followed by a vote on whether that member-elect has a right to be sworn in.
In the case of DSA members, one potential argument could be the group's platform calling to scrap the current U.S. Constitution and draft a new one. Several DSA members and self-proclaimed democratic socialists have already won primaries across the country.
LINK
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:34 am to uggabugga
They won. Too late. Blame those that sat at home or voted for them.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:35 am to uggabugga
This would backfire dramatically
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:35 am to uggabugga
If they did this they'd get their asses kicked even harder in '28.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:35 am to uggabugga
quote:
R's have the requisite huevos to do this?
Only thing they capable of now is naming a post office.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:35 am to uggabugga
I think if they say they swear there’s nothing you can do.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:36 am to DeBoar
They have to swear to uphold the constitution. If they're honest, they'll be unwilling to do that.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:37 am to uggabugga
Winners make the rules
Democrats won
Prepare yourself accordingly
Democrats won
Prepare yourself accordingly
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:38 am to uggabugga
quote:
They have to swear to uphold the constitution. If they're honest, they'll be unwilling to do that.
Since when do we think Dems have a shred of honesty?
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:39 am to uggabugga
Nobody is looking to scrap the constitution, and honestly that argument isn't one that Republicans want to get into when Trump has repeatedly talked/joked about defying the constitution. (ex.Running for a third term, birthright citizenship)
This reeks of desperation
This reeks of desperation
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:40 am to DeBoar
Or blame the candidates. Max miller, Cindy, Ken Paxton just three off the top of my head oh and Lindsay grahams sister. Never saw Cindy but Scott was all over. Met him twice and both times he had ( assuming advisor) writing every question and concern down.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:42 am to uggabugga
quote:Nothing in the Constitution bans any particular political or economic philosophy.
Members-elect must swear an oath to uphold the Constitution before they can become full members of the House.
quote:You cannot disenfranchise candidates based on what some people claim they *might* do. If that was the case Trump would have never taken office. There were plenty of people claiming he was “literally Hitler” and would suspend any future elections.
In the case of DSA members, one potential argument could be the group's platform calling to scrap the current U.S. Constitution and draft a new one.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:42 am to uggabugga
Yeeeeaaahhhhh, um, that's not gonna happen. Stop sipping on the other guy's peyote.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:44 am to uggabugga
quote:
The question is, do any of the R's have the requisite huevos to do this?
You would think that the lessons learned via these midterm elections would end this Trump style bullshite.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:45 am to uggabugga
quote:
If they're honest, they'll be unwilling to do that.
This is the part of the plan that wouldn’t work
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:46 am to uggabugga
We’ve let a cadre of incompetents take over the GOP, because the one test now is sucking up to a belligerent narcissist. Because of that, even socialists are capable of beating our candidates. And the solution is to not seat them?
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:52 am to uggabugga
quote:
Refuse to swear in the socialists
Posted by uggabugga
If you hate democracy you arent American. Move somewhere else.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:59 am to uggabugga
quote:
Refuse to swear in the socialists
Yes, bc this type of bullshite will win back moderates for sure.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 11:07 am to uggabugga
Lol socialism is the new boogie man. I thought we’re against Communism and Marxism, but now we’ve lumped Socialism into that same category.
Repubs better adapt or die.
This ain’t your Adam Smith Capitalism anymore baby.
Repubs better adapt or die.
This ain’t your Adam Smith Capitalism anymore baby.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 11:11 am to uggabugga
Give it up stupid ! What part of "it's Over" don't you understand ?!?!

Popular
Back to top
15












