Started By
Message

re: Raffensperger refusing to testify about Georgia's voting machines

Posted on 12/27/23 at 8:46 am to
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2371 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 8:46 am to
quote:

I would think that Dems are getting pretty nervous. Seems like the knots in the string intended to "get Trump" are coming unwound. There was definitely voter fraud in Chicago and Georgia. Smith's cases are losing steam. Trump has increasingly gained support they it all.
This has been going on 8 years and untold millions of tax dollars trying to "get Trump".
They keep throwing mud but it isn't sticking.


"Well, if those pesky pissant citizens would just vote how we tell them, we wouldn't have to do all this stuff!" - Deep State
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2371 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 8:49 am to
quote:

quote:
They stole the presidency


No doubt about it.


As soon as I read about the letter from hundreds of "former" intelligence officials endorsing Biden, leading up to the 2020 "election," I knew they were not going to let Trump win. And the push for mail-in ballots under the cover of COVID made it insanely obvious as to how they would do it.

Other countries have civil wars over this type of stuff.
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2371 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Did you not see the results of the Dominion vs Fox News lawsuit?

How would this be any different? There’s no evidence the voting machines were rigged.


They settled. So, you cannot say "there is no evidence." The evidence never had a chance to be requested/examined/weighed by a court. FOX bowed to its GOPe, uniparty, Deep State leadership who were all in on getting rid of Trump and they fired Tucker for putting them in the position of having to do so.
Posted by texas tortilla
houston
Member since Dec 2015
1852 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 8:55 am to
did that settlement come out of Fox's pocket or insurance?
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2371 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 8:55 am to
quote:

They went through the Discovery phase and it was an absolute disaster for Fox which is why they settled



You're so full of shite.

Or if you believe this, you're TDS has made you very naive.
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2371 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 8:56 am to
This guy STILL thinks the 2020 election was legitimate.
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2371 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 8:58 am to
quote:

What part of Dominion already successfully going through a discovery phase


Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2371 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 9:00 am to
NOOOO... Ronrick trusts Dominion completely and they say their machines are perfect. Gah!
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2371 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 9:02 am to
Yeah, I am searching for a more reputable link myself. Otherwise, my "no fraud" friends and family will just bash the source and dismiss the story as "disinformation," and "why isn't it on the news?"
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2371 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Which is why every challenge to the rigged 2020 GE was blocked by every judge.....they were never going to allow anyone to examine the millions of ballots that installed the illegitimate regime into power because they knew chain of custody would not be possible to verify.


Exactly. They were all dismissed on procedural grounds. There has never been an true examination of the evidence. They don't want the evidence to be made public.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111562 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 9:09 am to
quote:

While these vulnerabilities present risks that should be promptly mitigated, CISA has no evidence that these vulnerabilities have been exploited in any elections,


And before this report came out, you and other frickfaces like you were telling us there were no vulnerabilities.

You also have no idea what you’re talking about in general. Probably in most of your life. You should shut up and listen more and talk less.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34242 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 9:12 am to
quote:

“While these vulnerabilities present risks


These “vulnerabilities” shouldn’t exist in the first place.

Stating that “no evidence exists” assumes that they actually looked for any and all instances of frickery.

The reality is that you are trusting a government agency that is basically saying “Relax, trust us,” when it comes to investigating another government entity (that may have had tacit approval of the investigating agency). I would trust these parking garage attendants more than I trust CISA at this point. Give me independent audits or STFU.



Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118902 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Read this you imbecile.


You link to wiki?
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
7002 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Idiot. They settled


AFTER the discovery phase

You people are literally retarded.

Read the part titled Discovery.

LINK
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422922 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 9:24 am to
Has anyone linked to the actual appeal?

I don't doubt an appeal was filed, but I have a feeling the "news" article in OP may not be fully truthful.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422922 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 9:26 am to
quote:

And before this report came out, you and other frickfaces like you were telling us there were no vulnerabilities.

Let me just state for the record I never said there weren't possible vulnerabilities. There are vulnerabilities in pretty much every system. As for 2020, the onus is proving these putative vulnerabilities (1) were exploited; (2) affected the totals; and (3) how much the totals were affected.

Has any definitive data on THAT come out? I know pillow man has routinely been embarrassed (to the tune of losing a $5M bet) trying to show all 3.
Posted by jbdawgs03
Athens
Member since Oct 2017
9666 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 9:26 am to
Sooooo who is it? What will you do if Trump is the nominee?
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
7002 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 9:27 am to
quote:

And before this report came out, you and other frickfaces like you were telling us there were no vulnerabilities.




There’s vulnerabilities every time you get in a motor vehicle or airplane. There’s vulnerability in everything in life. Doesn’t mean I’m going to die in a car wreck when I go to the store later today. I didn’t tell you shite. The only thing I have told you as that YES there absolutely was Discovery in the Dominion vs Fox News lawsuit and it ended very badly for Fox with them paying hundreds of millions and your hero Tucker Carlson losing his job partly because of said Discovery Phase that the Trump worshippers said didn’t happen. Also, Sydney Powell who was going to unleash The Kracken said no sane person should have believed her claims of voter fraud under oath. You are worshipping a bunch of grifters as some sort of truth. It’s all there for everyone to see. People who have actual evidence present it they don’t make hungers of millions in payouts or take plea deals.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422922 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 9:29 am to
quote:

They settled. So, you cannot say "there is no evidence." The evidence never had a chance to be requested/examined/weighed by a court.

They did discovery. Fox News would have this data. Why do they need to show it in court? Why are y'all so obsessed with courts being the only avenue to releasing the Kraken? Same shite with Rudy in the suit he admited to defamation instead of turning over evidence proving his claims

Funny note I found last week about Rudy and that suit, Rudy has joined team SFP and claims the Gateway Pundit are liars.

quote:

During his closing arguments in the defamation lawsuit against Giuliani, attorney Joseph Sibley tried to convince a Washington, D.C, jury that Giuliani was a minor player in the unfounded election fraud allegations that led to an avalanche of threats against Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss.

Others deserve more blame, Sibley contends, specifically pointing to the right-wing website Gateway Pundit over its publication of security camera footage that linked Freeman and Moss to the unfounded allegations of election fraud touted by Giuliani and former President Donald Trump’s campaign.

Sibley argued that Gateway Pundit was “patient zero” in spreading the conspiracy theory.

“More likely than not,” Sibley told the jury, “this is the party that sort of doxed these women.”
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
7002 posts
Posted on 12/27/23 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Sooooo who is it? What will you do if Trump is the nominee?


I’m not voting for Donald Trump. I’m not voting for ANY democrat. Trump is too god damn old and is just as cognitively impaired as Biden is. Trump is only running so his legal bills can be paid. That’s it. He doesn’t give two shits about anyone on this message board. He cares about himself. He’s no different than Biden in that respect.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram