- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Raffensperger refusing to testify about Georgia's voting machines
Posted on 12/27/23 at 10:52 am to WPBTiger
Posted on 12/27/23 at 10:52 am to WPBTiger
IMO, elected officials and government employees should not be allowed to refuse to publicly testify in court or in front of legislatures and keep their job unless they are invoking the 5th Amendment to protect themselves from self incrimination (which raises additional job security questions) or the issue is that they are being asked about is classified or the subject of an ongoing investigation in which public discussion would jeopardize the investigation.
This post was edited on 12/27/23 at 10:58 am
0
Posted on 12/27/23 at 10:53 am to jimmy the leg
Was there Discovery in the Fox News vs Dominion lawsuit?
Posted on 12/27/23 at 10:54 am to ronricks
More deflection, while still not answering the question.
Again, I admire your singular mindset.
It’s almost as though you’ve been programmed.
Again, I admire your singular mindset.
It’s almost as though you’ve been programmed.
Posted on 12/27/23 at 10:57 am to jimmy the leg
Why won’t you answer?
Posted on 12/27/23 at 11:00 am to ronricks
quote:
along with trying to educate the people on here
is this what you think you’re doing?Posted on 12/27/23 at 11:02 am to ronricks
quote:
Was there Discovery in the Fox News vs Dominion lawsuit?
Provide the interrogatories and requests for production. I’d love to read them. The responses in them would be fascinating.
This post was edited on 12/27/23 at 11:03 am
Posted on 12/27/23 at 11:03 am to BBONDS25
quote:
is this what you think you’re doing?
We’ve got several Trump sycophants on here claiming ‘fraud’ but didn’t even know there was Discovery in the Fox News vs Dominion lawsuit and even when presented with that fact still deny there was Discovery. What would you call that? I know what I would call it.
Posted on 12/27/23 at 11:04 am to ronricks
quote:
Why won’t you answer?
Is this your attempt at situational comedy?
If not, then…
Posted on 12/27/23 at 11:20 am to ronricks
quote:
We’ve got several Trump sycophants on here claiming ‘fraud’ but didn’t even know there was Discovery in the Fox News vs Dominion lawsuit and even when presented with that fact still deny there was Discovery. What would you call that? I know what I would call it.
I’d love to read that discovery. Can you link the interrogatories and RFPs and the responses?
Posted on 12/27/23 at 11:23 am to ronricks
Did any of the discovery info. get presented in court? You are being disingenuous. You know the answer but will side step it.
This post was edited on 12/27/23 at 11:25 am
Posted on 12/27/23 at 11:27 am to WPBTiger
The city of Atlanta is a leaking puss filled boil on the arse crack of Georgia.
Posted on 12/27/23 at 12:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They did discovery. Fox News would have this data. Why do they need to show it in court? Why are y'all so obsessed with courts being the only avenue to releasing the Kraken? Same shite with Rudy in the suit he admited to defamation instead of turning over evidence proving his claims
Funny note I found last week about Rudy and that suit, Rudy has joined team SFP and claims the Gateway Pundit are liars.
Masterful post. Bravo
But "muh discovery didn't happen", I see this thread is full of federal procedure savants.
Posted on 12/27/23 at 12:30 pm to GumboPot
Oh god not TGP is citing The James "Magazine"
Why don't they post the actual appeal?
Why don't they post the actual appeal?
Posted on 12/27/23 at 1:28 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
What gets me is the Trumpist focus on Detroit.
That’s a legitimate focus. The county’s votes didn’t balance. They couldn’t match up voters with ballots in Wayne County. And they made separate precincts for vote by mail than in-person voters so you couldn’t tell where the discrepancy arose.
It was intentional.
The certification of the county’s vote was delayed until the Republicans were told an audit and investigation would be performed. As soon as they certified, the Democrats said “Yeah, we didn’t make a legally binding agreement to investigate. But you did certify. So tough titties.” Not quite a direct quote, but close.
Posted on 12/27/23 at 1:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
For this argument, that's fine. I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, but to discuss 2020, you have to do the 3 things I posted about.
You always want to avoid the actual holes in the system.
There’s no tracking of changes made by user.
When ballots are not automatically adjudicated, a user can go in and determine the voters intent, print out the new ballot with the “voters intent” and replace the original ballot with the new adjudicated ballot.
None of this is tracked by user.
There is some indication that ballots which did not adjudicate can be adjudicated by batch processes. Try to let that sink in. Thus the clamor for the original ballot images.
This would not be unacceptable security for a voting system for a high school election. Let alone a state-wide federal election.
That’s to say nothing of software updates and timing, fractional voting possibilities, lack of ongoing certification of machines and internet connectivity.
This post was edited on 12/27/23 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 12/27/23 at 2:39 pm to ronricks
quote:
Why won’t you answer?
He asked you first. Perhaps if you answer his question he will answer yours.
Posted on 12/27/23 at 2:41 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
Why won’t you answer?
He asked you first. Perhaps if you answer his question he will answer yours.
He avoids anything that does not fit his commie agenda.
Posted on 12/27/23 at 2:47 pm to Warboo
quote:
He avoids anything that does not fit his commie agenda.
Like you avoiding the results of the Fox News vs Dominion lawsuit discovery phase that supposedly never happened according to the Trump sycophants?
Posted on 12/27/23 at 2:51 pm to ronricks
quote:
Like you avoiding the results of the Fox News vs Dominion lawsuit discovery phase that supposedly never happened according to the Trump sycophants?
Can you link the interrogatories, RFPs, and the responses? It would be a fascinating read.
quote:. Yet another trite cliche. Get smarter.
sycophants?
This post was edited on 12/27/23 at 2:52 pm
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News