re: Questions for the election fraud deniers?

quote:

---

you are wrong, likely on the "spectrum" and a deficient thinker OR(and this is my guess) pathologically dishonest.

Statistical anomalies,

thousands upon thousands of affidavits,

the laws enacted by democrats mid-covid designed to make it easier to cheat,

the admission of Joe Biden himself of "the largest voting fraud organization in American history",

the pervasive propagandist messaging and polling from the pathetic media,

closing down voting centers from observers in virtually all swing states,

the illicit computer connections in voting usages illegally to outside sources,

there are tons more

make you simply a lying piece of shite

---

Have fun with your conspiracy nonsense.

quote:

---

He who claims something extraordinary has the burden of providing the evidence

---

You actually have that backwards - the extraordinary claims would be that there was NO fraud.

SO - the only way to determine if there were 'enough' potential fraud to reverse the announced result, the ONLY thing that any rational mind would do is to do some sort of AUDIT.
Q1 = WHO is resisting b.a.m.n. the conduct of 'any' sort of audit.

THEN - We have to ask = "was there anything different about this election than all the others???"
ANS = there were ENORMOUS differences - even outright unconstitutional events - all under the cover of 'an emergency' (how convenient - since the 'differences' were things the DEMs have been wanting to do for over a decade - e.g. ballot harvesting, no ID, no signature match, unrequested mail in ballots, extended vote periods, delayed times to report the results, etc,

OK - then WHERE were these 'different procedures' implemented???
ANS = why how coincidental - the very five states where the election procedures were relaxed are the same five states that pushed Biden over the top.

Rational minds want to know.

Anyone who RESISTs any sort of audit is awfully afraid that they election was stolen

Anyone who REFUSES to rationally DISCUSS any of the 'convenient' election procedure changes KNOW the election was stolen.

Which side are you on?

I don't know about Milwaukee out of ignorance. But I do know Michigan. Trump actually got more votes in Detroit proper this time than in 2016. But it's not Detroit where he lost....he was never going to make significant inroads there. Trump lost Michigan in Grand Rapids mostly. Democrats focused on flipping Kent County and had been camped out there since late 2017. They got Kent and a neighboring County....both went for Trump by thin margins in 2016. Also he lost Saginaw County.

In PA, I will grant you there was something fishy in Philadelphia, but Trump underperformed in Bucks and West Chester. Also Republican election lawyers were caught sleeping on the " emergency relief" that allowed for the wholesale issuance of mail in ballots in contravention of state law.

But Trump also lost Georgia and Arizona and he lost them straight up. Democrats have been working in GA to flip it since 2012. In Arizona no one was paying attention when Maricopa County switched from Republican to Democrat on a local level 3 years ago.

While you were looking at the rallies, you missed the manuvering of the Democrats on a longer term. They outflanked Trump and the Republicans and that flanking procedure began before 2020 and was in place when the primaries began.

Democrats know how to electioneer. Republicans and now Trumpkins do not. You keep fixating on the fraud without sufficient evidence that will pass even cursory muster. Then you compound it with clowns like Sidney Powell and Lin Wood and a drunk Giuliani. If you want to beat Democrats even in Presidential races you must first control the mechanics of the vote on the local level and I mean at the municipal level

Because Dems are hypocritical jackasses.

Yep. All politics is local. Even the national elections. Anyone can get crowds to show up before election day, but how you get people to the polls and the manner and people in charge of the counting are just as if not MORE important.

Early voting and absentee voting become a problem for Republicans because most probably both are controlled by local Democrat hacks...especially in urban areas. Vote in judges and local pols that you can trust and then implement a zero trust policy.

Your reference to Trump and Russia is spot on and is exactly what I’m talking about. The burden is in the party making the accusation. The Russia conspiracy was utterly unpersuasive. The problem in the election is that there is a system for challenging election results and Trump failed to prevail under that system.

quote:

---

What I know, beyond doubt, is that those claiming election fraud were not able to gain any traction in any court. In our system, that means there either wasn't substantial fraud or the aggrieved side lacks the ability to prove its case.

---

Where were you when what is the most convenient cop out extant in the present judicial system to avoid the ever-present threat of riots was to keep ruling "no standing" over and over again.

Nothing new here. They did the same thing with Obama's hastily, digitally constructed 3rd version of his B.C.

It will continue as the need arises.

They kept invoking that wedge they use to determine "standing."

That the plaintiff must show how he/she was personally injured by the action(s) in the complaint.

Well, how about an entire country "injured" by the purposeful with malice aforethought corruption of the election process.

But then look at the riots and property destruction we've avoided since the "no standing" cop out was continually and conveniently invoked.

Instead of only billions of dollars in destroyed property, lost careers, livelihoods, and families, it might have gone into the trillions.

So we've got people with the absolute best of intentions watching out for us.

We should be thanking them instead of vilifying them.

quote:

---

the mainstream media has a high threshold of proof before they report on things like that. That is what legitimate journalists do.

---

Are you fricking kidding me?

quote:

---

I would answer many of the questions in the manner you likely desire, but you've got the whole thing backward. He who claims something extraordinary has the burden of providing the evidence of it

---

Like I have said multiple times before. EVERYONE knows the election was stolen. The above comment just solidifies that belief.

Prove it, prove it, prove it. All the while pretending it hasn't already been proven multiple times many ways.

She knows it. They all know it. Everyone knows it.

Counts on tv turning backwards, windows being boarded up... the list is endless.

Stupid dims stop pretending the evidence hasn't already be shown. Of course dims are scum so they will never admit that the sky is blue.